• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

成年癌症幸存者中的“失访”情况

"Lost to Follow-up" Among Adult Cancer Survivors.

作者信息

Gill Amitoj, Gosain Rohit, Bhandari Shruti, Gosain Rahul, Gill Gurkirat, Abraham Joseph, Miller Kenneth

机构信息

James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY.

Division of Hematology and Oncology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY.

出版信息

Am J Clin Oncol. 2018 Oct;41(10):1024-1027. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000408.

DOI:10.1097/COC.0000000000000408
PMID:29028642
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Follow-up cancer care is important for patients who have received IV chemotherapy but some patients discontinue their care and are lost to follow-up (LFU) at the cancer center where they were treated. The purpose of this study was to determine what proportion of cancer survivors are LFU at 5 years after treatment, the timing of LFU, and the characteristics of those who do not continue survivorship care.

METHODS

Adult patients with cancer who were treated with chemotherapy at a large community teaching hospital in 2006 and 2007 were identified and linked with State tumor registry data. Hospital medical records were reviewed to obtain information on demographics, diagnosis, treatment, and date of last follow-up visit. Characteristics of patients with ≥5 years of follow-up care were compared with those who were LFU.

RESULTS

In total, 487 patients received chemotherapy and 304 died (62%) during the 5-year follow-up period. Among the 183 cancer patients who were known to be alive at 5 years, 92 (50%) were LFU and 50% (46/92) of this LFU group were LFU within 1 year of diagnosis. At 5 years, follow-up care was continuing for 55% of women, compared with 39% of men. The highest proportion of follow-up was observed among lung cancer patients (84%), followed by patients with breast cancers (63%) and gastrointestinal cancers (40%). Patients with hematological cancers had the lowest follow-up proportion at 5 years (29%) (P<0.05). Follow-up was not significantly associated with age (P=0.48), insurance status(P=0.29), and race(P=0.06).

CONCLUSIONS

It is estimated that 65% of the cancer survivors in the United States are ≥5 years beyond their diagnosis but there is little data on oncology follow-up rates. In our retrospective study of 183 patients who were treated with chemotherapy only 49.7% continue to follow-up at their treatment center. LFU has important implications in planning long-term care strategies for cancer survivors and in survivorship research.

摘要

背景

后续癌症护理对于接受过静脉化疗的患者很重要,但一些患者会中断护理,并在接受治疗的癌症中心失去随访(LFU)。本研究的目的是确定癌症幸存者在治疗后5年时失去随访的比例、失去随访的时间,以及那些不再继续接受生存护理的患者的特征。

方法

确定2006年和2007年在一家大型社区教学医院接受化疗的成年癌症患者,并将其与州肿瘤登记数据相关联。查阅医院病历以获取有关人口统计学、诊断、治疗和最后一次随访日期的信息。将接受≥5年随访护理的患者特征与失去随访的患者特征进行比较。

结果

在5年随访期内,共有487例患者接受了化疗,304例(62%)死亡。在已知5年时仍存活的183例癌症患者中,92例(50%)失去随访,且该失去随访组中有50%(46/92)在诊断后1年内失去随访。在5年时,55%的女性继续接受随访护理,而男性为39%。肺癌患者的随访比例最高(84%),其次是乳腺癌患者(63%)和胃肠道癌症患者(40%)。血液系统癌症患者在5年时的随访比例最低(29%)(P<0.05)。随访与年龄(P=0.48)、保险状况(P=0.29)和种族(P=0.06)无显著关联。

结论

据估计,美国65%的癌症幸存者已确诊超过5年,但关于肿瘤学随访率的数据很少。在我们对183例仅接受化疗的患者的回顾性研究中,只有49.7%的患者继续在其治疗中心接受随访。失去随访对癌症幸存者长期护理策略的规划和生存研究具有重要意义。

相似文献

1
"Lost to Follow-up" Among Adult Cancer Survivors.成年癌症幸存者中的“失访”情况
Am J Clin Oncol. 2018 Oct;41(10):1024-1027. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000408.
2
Italian cancer figures--Report 2015: The burden of rare cancers in Italy.意大利癌症数据——2015年报告:意大利罕见癌症的负担
Epidemiol Prev. 2016 Jan-Feb;40(1 Suppl 2):1-120. doi: 10.19191/EP16.1S2.P001.035.
3
Integration of cancer registry and electronic health record data to construct a childhood cancer survivorship cohort, facilitate risk stratification for late effects, and assess appropriate follow-up care.整合癌症登记和电子健康记录数据,构建儿童癌症生存者队列,为晚期效应进行风险分层,并评估适当的随访护理。
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2021 Jun;68(6):e29014. doi: 10.1002/pbc.29014. Epub 2021 Mar 19.
4
Loss to follow-up in registries of rheumatic patients treated with biologics: a potential information bias in assessing pharmacovigilance and efficacy outcomes.生物制剂治疗的风湿病患者登记中的失访情况:评估药物警戒和疗效结果时的潜在信息偏倚
Acta Reumatol Port. 2019 Oct-Dec;44(4):281-287.
5
Patterns of Long-term Cancer Survivorship Care in a National Cancer Institute-Designated Comprehensive Cancer Center.国立癌症研究所指定的综合性癌症中心的长期癌症幸存者护理模式
Am J Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec;40(6):639-643. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000217.
6
Conditional relative survival among long-term survivors of adolescent and young adult cancers.青少年和青年癌症长期幸存者的条件相对生存率。
Cancer. 2018 Jul 15;124(14):3037-3043. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31529. Epub 2018 May 9.
7
Survivor clinic attendance among pediatric- and adolescent-aged survivors of childhood cancer.儿童癌症幸存者的生存者门诊就诊率。
J Cancer Surviv. 2019 Feb;13(1):56-65. doi: 10.1007/s11764-018-0727-3. Epub 2018 Dec 17.
8
Loss to Follow-up in Adolescent and Young Adult Renal Transplant Recipients.青少年和年轻成年肾脏移植受者的随访丢失。
Transplantation. 2021 Jun 1;105(6):1326-1336. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000003445.
9
Causes of Death and Hospitalization in Long-term Lung Cancer Survivors: A Population-based Appraisal.长期肺癌幸存者的死亡原因和住院情况:基于人群的评估。
Clin Lung Cancer. 2020 May;21(3):204-213. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2019.08.007. Epub 2019 Aug 30.
10
Survivorship care visits in a high-risk population of breast cancer survivors.高危乳腺癌幸存者的生存护理访视。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Feb;173(3):701-708. doi: 10.1007/s10549-018-5028-z. Epub 2018 Nov 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors associated with lost to follow-up and delayed follow-up in patients with choroidal nevus.脉络膜痣患者失访和随访延迟的相关因素。
Eye (Lond). 2025 Jun 19. doi: 10.1038/s41433-025-03889-w.
2
Defining long-term survivors in metastatic lung cancer: insights from a Delphi study in Spain.定义转移性肺癌的长期幸存者:来自西班牙一项德尔菲研究的见解。
Front Oncol. 2025 Apr 4;15:1546019. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1546019. eCollection 2025.
3
Analysis of preferences and responses to recall in adolescent and young adult head and neck cancer survivors treated with radiotherapy.
对接受放射治疗的青少年和青年头颈癌幸存者的偏好及回忆反应的分析。
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Mar 14;33(4):281. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09340-w.
4
Does an Autoimmune Disorder Following Ovarian Cancer Diagnosis Affect Prognosis?卵巢癌诊断后自身免疫性疾病是否影响预后?
Curr Oncol. 2024 Aug 13;31(8):4613-4623. doi: 10.3390/curroncol31080344.
5
Sociodemographic Disparities in the Diagnosis and Prognosis of Patients With Cervical Cancer: An Analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program.宫颈癌患者诊断与预后的社会人口学差异:监测、流行病学和最终结果计划分析
Cureus. 2023 Jul 6;15(7):e41477. doi: 10.7759/cureus.41477. eCollection 2023 Jul.
6
Incidence of different types of cancer in the follow-up period after primary diagnosis and treatment of melanoma. Single-centre 4-year follow-up on a population of 709 patients.黑色素瘤初次诊断和治疗后随访期间不同类型癌症的发病率。对709名患者群体进行的单中心4年随访。
Postepy Dermatol Alergol. 2023 Jun;40(3):416-420. doi: 10.5114/ada.2023.127545. Epub 2023 Jun 21.
7
A Multicenter Study of Clinical Presentations and Outcomes of Multiple Myeloma in Pakistan: The Real-World Analysis in a Resource-Constrained Country.巴基斯坦多发性骨髓瘤临床表现与结局的多中心研究:资源受限国家的真实世界分析
Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus. 2022 Apr;38(2):309-318. doi: 10.1007/s12288-021-01485-y. Epub 2021 Sep 2.
8
Factors associated with loss to follow-up after radiation therapy for head and neck cancer.头颈部癌症放射治疗后随访丢失的相关因素。
Head Neck. 2022 Apr;44(4):943-951. doi: 10.1002/hed.26986. Epub 2022 Jan 25.
9
Parosteal osteosarcoma with high-grade transformation and lung metastasis after 12 years: a rare presentation.12年后发生高级别转化和肺转移的骨旁骨肉瘤:一种罕见的表现。
Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Jan;38(1):62-66. doi: 10.1007/s12055-021-01214-0. Epub 2021 Jul 28.
10
Can the LACE index help identify uninsured patients at risk of loss to follow-up during a pharmacist-led transitions of care program?在药师主导的过渡期医疗护理计划中,LACE 指数能否帮助识别出无保险且有随访脱落风险的患者?
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2022 Mar-Apr;62(2):564-568. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2021.11.001. Epub 2021 Nov 3.