• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Can the LACE index help identify uninsured patients at risk of loss to follow-up during a pharmacist-led transitions of care program?在药师主导的过渡期医疗护理计划中,LACE 指数能否帮助识别出无保险且有随访脱落风险的患者?
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2022 Mar-Apr;62(2):564-568. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2021.11.001. Epub 2021 Nov 3.
2
Implementation of a pharmacist-led transitions of care program in an indigent care clinic: A randomized controlled trial.在贫困护理诊所实施药师主导的过渡期护理计划:一项随机对照试验。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2021 May-Jun;61(3):276-283.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2021.01.009. Epub 2021 Jan 31.
3
Evaluation of prediction strategy and care coordination for COPD readmissions.慢性阻塞性肺疾病再入院的预测策略与护理协调评估
Hosp Pract (1995). 2016 Aug;44(3):123-8. doi: 10.1080/21548331.2016.1210472. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
4
The LACE+ index fails to predict 30-90 day readmission for supratentorial craniotomy patients: A retrospective series of 238 surgical procedures.LACE+指数无法预测幕上开颅手术患者30至90天的再入院情况:一项针对238例外科手术的回顾性研究。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2019 Jul;182:79-83. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2019.04.026. Epub 2019 May 1.
5
Impact of pharmacist-led medication management in care transitions.药师主导的药物管理在护理转接中的影响。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Nov 13;17(1):722. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2684-3.
6
Validity of the LACE index for identifying frequent early readmissions after hospital discharge in children.LACE指数用于识别儿童出院后频繁早期再入院的有效性。
Eur J Pediatr. 2021 May;180(5):1571-1579. doi: 10.1007/s00431-021-03929-z. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
7
Using the LACE index to predict hospital readmissions in congestive heart failure patients.使用LACE指数预测充血性心力衰竭患者的医院再入院情况。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2014 Aug 7;14:97. doi: 10.1186/1471-2261-14-97.
8
The LACE index and risk factors of 14-day versus 30-day readmissions in children.LACE 指数与儿童 14 天和 30 天再入院风险因素的比较。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2023 May 26;35(2). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzad032.
9
LACE+ Index as Predictor of 30-Day Readmission in Brain Tumor Population.LACE+指数作为脑肿瘤患者30天再入院的预测指标
World Neurosurg. 2019 Jul;127:e443-e448. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.03.169. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
10
External validation of the modified LACE+, LACE+, and LACE scores to predict readmission or death after hospital discharge.改良后的 LACE+、LACE+和 LACE 评分对外科出院后再入院或死亡的预测的验证。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2021 Dec;27(6):1390-1397. doi: 10.1111/jep.13579. Epub 2021 May 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Implementation of a pharmacist-led transitions of care program in an indigent care clinic: A randomized controlled trial.在贫困护理诊所实施药师主导的过渡期护理计划:一项随机对照试验。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2021 May-Jun;61(3):276-283.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2021.01.009. Epub 2021 Jan 31.
2
Predicting for Lost to Follow-up in Surgical Management of Patients with Chronic Subdural Hematoma.预测慢性硬脑膜下血肿患者手术治疗中的失访情况。
World Neurosurg. 2021 Apr;148:e294-e300. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.12.128. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
3
Risk of Becoming Lost to Follow-up During Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer.前列腺癌主动监测随访丢失风险。
Eur Urol. 2018 Dec;74(6):704-707. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.08.010. Epub 2018 Aug 31.
4
Understanding and Preventing Loss to Follow-up: Experiences From the Spinal Cord Injury Model Systems.理解并预防失访:脊髓损伤模型系统的经验
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2018 Spring;24(2):97-109. doi: 10.1310/sci2402-97.
5
Variable selection - A review and recommendations for the practicing statistician.变量选择——给执业统计学家的一篇综述与建议
Biom J. 2018 May;60(3):431-449. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201700067. Epub 2018 Jan 2.
6
"Lost to Follow-up" Among Adult Cancer Survivors.成年癌症幸存者中的“失访”情况
Am J Clin Oncol. 2018 Oct;41(10):1024-1027. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000408.
7
The Effectiveness of Transitions-of-Care Interventions in Reducing Hospital Readmissions and Mortality: A Systematic Review.照护过渡干预措施在降低医院再入院率和死亡率方面的有效性:一项系统评价
Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 2017 Nov/Dec;36(6):311-316. doi: 10.1097/DCC.0000000000000266.
8
Inequality and the health-care system in the USA.美国的不平等与医疗保健系统。
Lancet. 2017 Apr 8;389(10077):1431-1441. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30398-7.
9
Factors relating to participation in follow-up to the 45 and up study in Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal individuals.与原住民和非原住民参与“45岁及以上研究”随访相关的因素。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 May 11;16:53. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0155-x.
10
Demographic factors associated with loss to follow up in the management of chronic otitis media: case-control study.慢性中耳炎管理中与失访相关的人口统计学因素:病例对照研究。
J Laryngol Otol. 2016 Feb;130(2):166-8. doi: 10.1017/S0022215115003266. Epub 2015 Dec 18.

在药师主导的过渡期医疗护理计划中,LACE 指数能否帮助识别出无保险且有随访脱落风险的患者?

Can the LACE index help identify uninsured patients at risk of loss to follow-up during a pharmacist-led transitions of care program?

出版信息

J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2022 Mar-Apr;62(2):564-568. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2021.11.001. Epub 2021 Nov 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.japh.2021.11.001
PMID:34802945
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8934298/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Uninsured patients are susceptible to being lost to follow-up (LTFU). In addition to being uninsured, follow-up is especially critical among this population during transitions of care when patients are discharged from the hospital setting back to home because follow-up care after discharge has been proven to prevent readmissions. The LACE tool has historically been used to predict readmissions, but the LACE tool has not been used to evaluate patients' risk of LTFU.

OBJECTIVE

To understand the potential translation of the LACE tool for use in uninsured patients' follow-up care, we assessed the association between LACE index scores and patients' risk of LTFU during a pharmacist-led transitions of care program for uninsured patients.

METHODS

Data were extracted from a randomized controlled trial implementing a pharmacist-led transitions of care program at an indigent care clinic. The study population included uninsured adult patients (>18 years old) who spoke English and attended a clinical visit with a pharmacist within 16 days after discharge from a community hospital. Analyses sought to determine factors associated with the patients' LTFU status.

RESULTS

Among 88 enrolled participants, 29 participants (32.95%) were LTFU. Thirty-two patients (36.4%) had a high LACE index score at baseline, indicating an increased risk of 30-day readmission. Of the remaining 56 patients (63.6%) with low-to-moderate LACE index scores, 54 (61.4%) had a moderate LACE index score, and only 2 (2.3%) had a low LACE index score. Uninsured patients with high LACE index scores had 70% lower odds of being LTFU than uninsured patients with low-to-moderate LACE index scores (exact odds ratio 0.297 [95% CI 0.081-0.947]).

CONCLUSION

The LACE index score was inversely related to the risk of LTFU during a pharmacist-led transitions of care program. Pharmacists may use the LACE tool to identify patients at high risk of LTFU.

摘要

背景

未参保患者容易失去随访(LTFU)。除了未参保外,在患者从医院环境出院回到家中的医疗过渡期,随访尤其重要,因为已证实出院后的随访护理可以预防再次入院。LACE 工具历来用于预测再次入院,但尚未用于评估患者 LTFU 的风险。

目的

为了了解 LACE 工具在未参保患者随访护理中的潜在应用,我们评估了 LACE 指数评分与药师主导的未参保患者医疗过渡期项目中患者 LTFU 风险之间的关联。

方法

数据来自一项在贫困患者诊所实施药师主导的医疗过渡期项目的随机对照试验中提取。研究人群包括英语患者(>18 岁),他们在社区医院出院后 16 天内就诊药师。分析旨在确定与患者 LTFU 状态相关的因素。

结果

在 88 名入组参与者中,有 29 名(32.95%)患者 LTFU。32 名患者(36.4%)基线时 LACE 指数评分较高,表明 30 天内再次入院的风险增加。在其余 56 名(63.6%)低中度 LACE 指数评分的患者中,54 名(61.4%)为中度 LACE 指数评分,仅有 2 名(2.3%)为低度 LACE 指数评分。LACE 指数评分较高的未参保患者与低中度 LACE 指数评分的未参保患者相比,LTFU 的可能性降低 70%(确切比值比 0.297 [95%CI 0.081-0.947])。

结论

在药师主导的医疗过渡期项目中,LACE 指数评分与 LTFU 风险呈负相关。药师可以使用 LACE 工具来识别 LTFU 风险高的患者。