Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Clinical Immunology, University Hospital Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Institute of Veterinary Physiology and Zurich Center of Integrative Human Physiology (ZIHP), Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 260, CH-8057, Zurich, Switzerland.
J Neuroinflammation. 2017 Oct 13;14(1):202. doi: 10.1186/s12974-017-0976-5.
Treatment with erythropoietin (Epo) in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), the rodent model of multiple sclerosis (MS), has consistently been shown to ameliorate disease progression and improve overall outcome. The effect has been attributed to modulation of the immune response and/or preservation of the central nervous system (CNS) tissue integrity. It remains unclear, however, if (a) Epo acts primarily in the CNS or the periphery and if (b) Epo's beneficial effect in EAE is mainly due to maintaining CNS tissue integrity or to modulation of the immune response. If Epo acts primarily by modulating the immune system, where is this modulation required? In the periphery, the CNS or both?
To address these questions, we used two well-characterized transgenic mouse strains that constitutively overexpress recombinant human Epo (rhEpo) either systemically (tg6) or in CNS only (tg21) in a MOG-induced EAE model. We assessed clinical severity, disease progression, immunomodulation, and CNS tissue integrity, including neuronal survival.
Although disease onset remained unaffected, EAE progression was alleviated in transgenic animals compared to controls with both lines performing equally well showing that expression of Epo in the periphery is not required; Epo expression in the CNS is sufficient. Immunomodulation was observed in both strains but surprisingly the profile of modulation differed substantially between strains. Modulation in the tg21 strain was limited to a reduction in macrophages in the CNS, with no peripheral immunomodulatory effects observed. In contrast, in the tg6 strain, macrophages were upregulated in the CNS, and, in the periphery of this strain, T cells and macrophages were downregulated. The lack of a consistent immunomodulatory profile across both transgenic species suggests that immunomodulation by Epo is unlikely to be the primary mechanism driving amelioration of EAE. Finally, CNS tissue integrity was affected in all strains. Although myelin appeared equally damaged in all strains, neuronal survival was significantly improved in the spinal cord of tg21 mice, indicating that Epo may ameliorate EAE predominantly by protecting neurons.
Our data suggests that moderate elevated brain Epo levels provide clinically significant neuroprotection in EAE without modulation of the immune response making a significant contribution.
在实验性自身免疫性脑脊髓炎(EAE),即多发性硬化症(MS)的啮齿动物模型中,使用促红细胞生成素(Epo)治疗一直显示出可改善疾病进展并改善整体预后。这种效果归因于对免疫反应的调节和/或中枢神经系统(CNS)组织完整性的保护。但是,目前尚不清楚(a)Epo 主要在中枢神经系统(CNS)还是外周起作用,以及(b)Epo 在 EAE 中的有益作用主要是由于维持 CNS 组织完整性还是由于调节免疫反应。如果 Epo 主要通过调节免疫系统起作用,那么这种调节在哪里是必需的?在外周,中枢神经系统还是两者都需要?
为了解决这些问题,我们使用了两种经过充分表征的转基因小鼠品系,这些品系在髓鞘少突胶质细胞糖蛋白(MOG)诱导的 EAE 模型中分别在全身(tg6)或仅在中枢神经系统(tg21)中组成性过表达重组人促红细胞生成素(rhEpo)。我们评估了临床严重程度、疾病进展、免疫调节和中枢神经系统组织完整性,包括神经元存活。
尽管疾病发作仍未受到影响,但与对照组相比,转基因动物的 EAE 进展得到缓解,两种品系的表现均相同,表明外周表达 Epo 不是必需的;中枢神经系统(CNS)中的 Epo 表达是足够的。在两种品系中都观察到了免疫调节,但令人惊讶的是,调节模式在品系之间存在很大差异。在 tg21 品系中,调节仅限于中枢神经系统中巨噬细胞的减少,而在外周没有观察到免疫调节作用。相比之下,在 tg6 品系中,中枢神经系统中的巨噬细胞被上调,而在该品系的外周,T 细胞和巨噬细胞被下调。两种转基因物种之间缺乏一致的免疫调节谱表明,Epo 的免疫调节不太可能是改善 EAE 的主要机制。最后,中枢神经系统组织完整性在所有品系中均受到影响。尽管所有品系中的髓鞘看起来同样受损,但 tg21 小鼠脊髓中的神经元存活明显改善,表明 Epo 可能主要通过保护神经元来改善 EAE。
我们的数据表明,中枢神经系统(CNS)中促红细胞生成素(Epo)水平适度升高可在没有调节免疫反应的情况下为 EAE 提供显著的神经保护作用,这是一个重要的贡献。