Department of Physics, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33620, USA.
Department of Physics, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33620, USA.
Cell Calcium. 2017 Nov;67:65-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ceca.2017.08.010. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
High resolution total internal reflection (TIRF) microscopy (TIRFM) together with detailed computational modeling provides a powerful approach towards the understanding of a wide range of Ca signals mediated by the ubiquitous inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP) receptor (IPR) channel. Exploiting this fruitful collaboration further requires close agreement between the models and observations. However, elementary Ca release events, puffs, imaged through TIRFM do not show the rapid single-channel openings and closings during and between puffs as are present in simulated puffs using data-driven single channel models. TIRFM also shows a rapid equilibration of 10ms after a channel opens or closes which is not achievable in simulation using standard Ca diffusion coefficients and reaction rates between indicator dye and Ca. Furthermore, TIRFM imaging cannot decipher the depth of the channel with respect to the microscope, which will affect the change in fluorescence that the microscope detects, thereby affecting its sensitivity to fast single-channel activity. Using the widely used Ca diffusion coefficients and reaction rates, our simulations show equilibration rates that are eight times slower than TIRFM imaging. We show that to get equilibrium rates consistent with observed values, the diffusion coefficients and reaction rates have to be significantly higher than the values reported in the literature, and predict the channel depth to be 200-250nm. Finally, we show that with the addition of noise, short events due to 1-2ms opening and closing of channels that are observed in computational models can be missed in TIRFM.
高分辨率全内反射(TIRF)显微镜(TIRFM)与详细的计算建模相结合,为理解广泛的钙信号提供了一种强大的方法,这些钙信号由普遍存在的肌醇 1,4,5-三磷酸(IP)受体(IPR)通道介导。进一步利用这种富有成效的合作,需要模型和观察结果之间的密切一致。然而,通过 TIRFM 成像的基本钙释放事件(puff)并没有显示出在 puff 期间和之间存在的快速单通道开放和关闭,而这些在使用数据驱动的单通道模型模拟的 puff 中是存在的。TIRFM 还显示出在通道打开或关闭后 10ms 内的快速平衡,这在使用标准钙扩散系数和指示剂染料与 Ca 之间的反应速率的模拟中是无法实现的。此外,TIRFM 成像无法分辨通道相对于显微镜的深度,这将影响显微镜检测到的荧光变化,从而影响其对快速单通道活动的灵敏度。使用广泛使用的钙扩散系数和反应速率,我们的模拟显示平衡速率比 TIRFM 成像慢八倍。我们表明,为了使平衡速率与观察到的值一致,扩散系数和反应速率必须明显高于文献中报道的值,并预测通道深度为 200-250nm。最后,我们表明,由于通道的 1-2ms 开放和关闭导致的噪声和短事件,在计算模型中观察到的这些事件可能会在 TIRFM 中丢失。