Department of Emergency Medicine and Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, UC San Diego Health System, U S.
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Stanford University, 900 Welch Road, Suite 350, Palo Alto, CA 94304, U S.
Resuscitation. 2017 Dec;121:76-80. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.09.020. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
Inpatient peri-intubation cardiac arrest (PICA) following emergent endotracheal intubation (ETI) is an uncommon but potentially preventable type of cardiac arrest (CA). Limited published data exist describing factors associated with inpatient PICA and patient outcomes. This study identifies risk factors associated with PICA among hospitalized patients emergently intubated out of the operating room and compares PICA to other types of inpatient CA.
Retrospective case-control study of patients at our institution over a five-year period. Cases were defined as inpatients emergently intubated outside of the operating room that experienced cardiac arrest within 20min after ETI. The control group consisted of inpatients emergently intubated out of the operating room without CA. Predictors of PICA were identified through univariate and multivariate analysis. Clinical outcomes were compared between PICA and other inpatient CAs, identified through a prospectively enrolled CA registry at our institution.
29 episodes of PICA occurred over 5 years, accounting for 5% of all inpatient arrests. Shock index ≥1.0, intubation within one hour of nursing shift change, and use of succinylcholine were independently associated with PICA. Sustained ROSC, survival to discharge, and neurocognitive outcome did not differ significantly between groups.
Patients outcomes following PICA were comparable to other causes of inpatient CA. Potentially modifiable factors were associated with PICA. Hemodynamic resuscitation, optimized staffing strategies, and possible avoidance of succinylcholine were associated with decreased risk of PICA. Clinical trials testing targeted strategies to optimize peri-intubation care are needed to identify effective interventions to prevent this potentially avoidable type of CA.
紧急气管插管(ETI)后住院期间的围插管期心搏骤停(PICA)是一种罕见但可能预防的心搏骤停(CA)类型。目前已有有限的文献描述了与住院患者 PICA 相关的因素和患者结局。本研究确定了在我院住院患者中,与紧急在手术室外进行的 ETI 后发生 PICA 相关的危险因素,并将 PICA 与其他类型的住院 CA 进行了比较。
这是一项回顾性病例对照研究,研究对象为我院 5 年内的患者。病例定义为紧急在手术室外进行气管插管的住院患者,在 ETI 后 20 分钟内发生心搏骤停。对照组由紧急在手术室外进行气管插管且无 CA 的住院患者组成。通过单变量和多变量分析确定 PICA 的预测因素。通过我院前瞻性登记的 CA 登记处,比较 PICA 与其他住院 CA 的临床结局。
5 年内共发生 29 例 PICA,占所有住院患者心搏骤停的 5%。休克指数≥1.0、插管在护理班次变更后 1 小时内进行、以及使用琥珀胆碱与 PICA 独立相关。两组患者的自主循环恢复(ROSC)持续时间、存活至出院率和神经认知结局无显著差异。
PICA 后患者结局与其他住院 CA 原因相当。与 PICA 相关的潜在可改变因素包括血流动力学复苏、优化人员配备策略以及可能避免使用琥珀胆碱。需要进行临床试验来测试针对围插管期护理的靶向策略,以确定预防这种潜在可避免的 CA 的有效干预措施。