• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗保健离散选择实验中的尺度异质性:入门指南。

Scale Heterogeneity in Healthcare Discrete Choice Experiments: A Primer.

机构信息

Manchester Centre for Health Economics, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

UWA School of Agriculture and Environment, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia.

出版信息

Patient. 2018 Apr;11(2):167-173. doi: 10.1007/s40271-017-0282-4.

DOI:10.1007/s40271-017-0282-4
PMID:29032437
Abstract

Discrete choice experiments (DCEs) are used to quantify the preferences of specified sample populations for different aspects of a good or service and are increasingly used to value interventions and services related to healthcare. Systematic reviews of healthcare DCEs have focussed on the trends over time of specific design issues and changes in the approach to analysis, with a more recent move towards consideration of a specific type of variation in preferences within the sample population, called taste heterogeneity, noting rises in the popularity of mixed logit and latent class models. Another type of variation, called scale heterogeneity, which relates to differences in the randomness of choice behaviour, may also account for some of the observed 'differences' in preference weights. The issue of scale heterogeneity becomes particularly important when comparing preferences across subgroups of the sample population as apparent differences in preferences could be due to taste and/or choice consistency. This primer aims to define and describe the relevance of scale heterogeneity in a healthcare context, and illustrate key points, with a simulated data set provided to readers in the Online appendix.

摘要

离散选择实验 (DCEs) 用于量化特定样本群体对商品或服务不同方面的偏好,并且越来越多地用于评估与医疗保健相关的干预措施和服务。医疗保健 DCE 的系统评价侧重于特定设计问题的随时间变化趋势和分析方法的变化,最近更多地关注样本群体内部偏好的特定类型变化,称为口味异质性,注意到混合对数和潜在类别模型的受欢迎程度有所上升。另一种类型的变化,称为规模异质性,与选择行为的随机性差异有关,也可能解释了一些观察到的偏好权重差异。当比较样本群体的亚组之间的偏好时,规模异质性问题变得尤为重要,因为偏好的明显差异可能是由于口味和/或选择一致性造成的。本指南旨在定义和描述医疗保健背景下规模异质性的相关性,并通过提供模拟数据集来说明要点,读者可以在在线附录中找到该数据集。

相似文献

1
Scale Heterogeneity in Healthcare Discrete Choice Experiments: A Primer.医疗保健离散选择实验中的尺度异质性:入门指南。
Patient. 2018 Apr;11(2):167-173. doi: 10.1007/s40271-017-0282-4.
2
Accounting for Scale Heterogeneity in Healthcare-Related Discrete Choice Experiments when Comparing Stated Preferences: A Systematic Review.当比较表述偏好时,在医疗相关离散选择实验中考虑规模异质性的会计:系统评价。
Patient. 2018 Oct;11(5):475-488. doi: 10.1007/s40271-018-0304-x.
3
Do patients and health care providers have discordant preferences about which aspects of treatments matter most? Evidence from a systematic review of discrete choice experiments.患者和医疗服务提供者在治疗的哪些方面最为重要这一问题上是否存在不一致的偏好?来自离散选择实验系统评价的证据。
BMJ Open. 2017 May 17;7(5):e014719. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014719.
4
Are Healthcare Choices Predictable? The Impact of Discrete Choice Experiment Designs and Models.医疗保健选择是否可预测?离散选择实验设计和模型的影响。
Value Health. 2019 Sep;22(9):1050-1062. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.04.1924. Epub 2019 Jun 8.
5
Using blocked fractional factorial designs to construct discrete choice experiments for healthcare studies.使用分组析因设计构建用于医疗保健研究的离散选择实验。
Stat Med. 2016 Jul 10;35(15):2543-60. doi: 10.1002/sim.6882. Epub 2016 Jan 28.
6
Current Practices for Accounting for Preference Heterogeneity in Health-Related Discrete Choice Experiments: A Systematic Review.当前健康相关离散选择实验中偏好异质性会计的实践:系统评价。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2022 Oct;40(10):943-956. doi: 10.1007/s40273-022-01178-y. Epub 2022 Aug 12.
7
Discrete choice experiments of pharmacy services: a systematic review.药学服务的离散选择实验:一项系统评价。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2016 Jun;38(3):620-30. doi: 10.1007/s11096-015-0221-1.
8
Stakeholders' preferences for the design and delivery of virtual care services: A systematic review of discrete choice experiments.利益相关者对虚拟护理服务设计与提供的偏好:离散选择实验的系统评价
Soc Sci Med. 2024 Jan;340:116459. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116459. Epub 2023 Nov 30.
9
Discrete choice analysis of health worker job preferences in Ethiopia: Separating attribute non-attendance from taste heterogeneity.埃塞俄比亚卫生工作者工作偏好的离散选择分析:将属性非参与和品味异质性分开。
Health Econ. 2022 May;31(5):806-819. doi: 10.1002/hec.4475. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
10
How well do discrete choice experiments predict health choices? A systematic review and meta-analysis of external validity.离散选择实验在多大程度上能够预测健康选择?系统评价和元分析的外部有效性。
Eur J Health Econ. 2018 Nov;19(8):1053-1066. doi: 10.1007/s10198-018-0954-6. Epub 2018 Jan 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Preferences for Attachment Devices for Individuals with Lower-Limb Loss: A Discrete-Choice Study to Inform Regulatory Decisions.下肢缺失者对附着装置的偏好:一项为监管决策提供信息的离散选择研究。
MDM Policy Pract. 2025 Jul 2;10(2):23814683251351044. doi: 10.1177/23814683251351044. eCollection 2025 Jul-Dec.
2
Identifying and Managing Fraudulent Respondents in Online Stated Preferences Surveys: A Case Example from Best-Worst Scaling in Health Preferences Research.识别和管理在线陈述偏好调查中的欺诈性受访者:健康偏好研究中最佳-最差尺度法的一个案例
Patient. 2025 May 3. doi: 10.1007/s40271-025-00740-y.
3
Preferences in adolescents and young people's sexual and reproductive health services in Nigeria: a discrete choice experiment.

本文引用的文献

1
Investigating the Heterogeneity in Women's Preferences for Breast Screening: Does the Communication of Risk Matter?探究女性对乳腺癌筛查偏好的异质性:风险沟通是否重要?
Value Health. 2018 Feb;21(2):219-228. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.07.010. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
2
Discrete Choice Experiments: A Guide to Model Specification, Estimation and Software.离散选择实验:模型设定、估计与软件指南
Pharmacoeconomics. 2017 Jul;35(7):697-716. doi: 10.1007/s40273-017-0506-4.
3
The Role of Qualitative Research Methods in Discrete Choice Experiments.
尼日利亚青少年和年轻人性与生殖健康服务的偏好:一项离散选择实验
Health Econ Rev. 2024 Mar 22;14(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s13561-024-00497-4.
4
Understanding the Impact of Different Modes of Information Provision on Preferences for a Newborn Bloodspot Screening Program in the United Kingdom.了解不同信息提供模式对英国新生儿血斑筛查项目偏好的影响。
MDM Policy Pract. 2024 Mar 4;9(1):23814683241232935. doi: 10.1177/23814683241232935. eCollection 2024 Jan-Jun.
5
Can the General Public Be a Proxy for an "At-Risk" Group in a Patient Preference Study? A Disease Prevention Example in Rheumatoid Arthritis.普通公众能否在患者偏好研究中代表“高危”群体?类风湿关节炎疾病预防的一个例子。
Med Decis Making. 2024 Feb;44(2):189-202. doi: 10.1177/0272989X231218265. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
6
Public preferences for online medical consultations in China: a discrete choice experiment.公众对中国在线医疗咨询的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Front Public Health. 2023 Dec 13;11:1282387. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1282387. eCollection 2023.
7
Comparison of Preferences and Data Quality between Discrete Choice Experiments Conducted in Online and Face-to-Face Respondents.在线和面对面受访者进行的离散选择实验中的偏好和数据质量比较。
Med Decis Making. 2023 Aug;43(6):667-679. doi: 10.1177/0272989X231171912. Epub 2023 May 18.
8
Taking the Shortcut: Simplifying Heuristics in Discrete Choice Experiments.抄近道:离散选择实验中的简化启发式方法。
Patient. 2023 Jul;16(4):301-315. doi: 10.1007/s40271-023-00625-y. Epub 2023 May 2.
9
A Comparison of Ordered Categorical versus Discrete Choices within a Stated Preference Survey of Whole-Blood Donors.全血献血者意愿调查中有序分类与离散选择的比较
Med Decis Making. 2023 Apr;43(3):362-373. doi: 10.1177/0272989X221145048. Epub 2022 Dec 24.
10
Preferences for private health insurance in China: A discrete choice experiment.中国人对私人健康保险的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Front Public Health. 2022 Sep 6;10:985582. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.985582. eCollection 2022.
定性研究方法在离散选择实验中的作用
Med Decis Making. 2017 Apr;37(3):298-313. doi: 10.1177/0272989X16683934. Epub 2017 Jan 6.
4
Statistical Methods for the Analysis of Discrete Choice Experiments: A Report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Good Research Practices Task Force.离散选择实验分析的统计方法:药物经济学与结果研究国际协会联合分析良好研究实践特别工作组报告
Value Health. 2016 Jun;19(4):300-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.04.004. Epub 2016 May 12.
5
Patients' and physicians' preferences for type 2 diabetes mellitus treatments in Spain and Portugal: a discrete choice experiment.西班牙和葡萄牙患者及医生对2型糖尿病治疗方法的偏好:一项离散选择实验
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2015 Oct 14;9:1443-58. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S88022. eCollection 2015.
6
Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature.健康经济学中的离散选择实验:文献综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2014 Sep;32(9):883-902. doi: 10.1007/s40273-014-0170-x.
7
Genomic testing to determine drug response: measuring preferences of the public and patients using Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE).基因组检测以确定药物反应:使用离散选择实验(DCE)衡量公众和患者的偏好。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Oct 31;13:454. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-454.
8
Do general practitioners know patients' preferences? An empirical study on the agency relationship at an aggregate level using a discrete choice experiment.全科医生了解患者的偏好吗?使用离散选择实验对代理关系进行总体层面的实证研究。
Value Health. 2012 May;15(3):514-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.01.002. Epub 2012 Feb 16.
9
Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature.健康经济学中的离散选择实验:文献综述。
Health Econ. 2012 Feb;21(2):145-72. doi: 10.1002/hec.1697. Epub 2010 Dec 19.
10
Valuing pharmacogenetic testing services: a comparison of patients' and health care professionals' preferences.评估药物遗传学检测服务:患者和医疗保健专业人员偏好的比较。
Value Health. 2011 Jan;14(1):121-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2010.10.007.