Suppr超能文献

东京指南 2018:急性胆管炎的诊断标准和严重程度分级(附视频)。

Tokyo Guidelines 2018: diagnostic criteria and severity grading of acute cholangitis (with videos).

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Ogaki Municipal Hospital, Gifu, Japan.

Department of Radiology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Ishikawa, Japan.

出版信息

J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2018 Jan;25(1):17-30. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.512. Epub 2018 Jan 5.

Abstract

Although the diagnostic and severity grading criteria on the 2013 Tokyo Guidelines (TG13) are used worldwide as the primary standard for management of acute cholangitis (AC), they need to be validated through implementation and assessment in actual clinical practice. Here, we conduct a systematic review of the literature to validate the TG13 diagnostic and severity grading criteria for AC and propose TG18 criteria. While there is little evidence evaluating the TG13 criteria, they were validated through a large-scale case series study in Japan and Taiwan. Analyzing big data from this study confirmed that the diagnostic rate of AC based on the TG13 diagnostic criteria was higher than that based on the TG07 criteria, and that 30-day mortality in patients with a higher severity based on the TG13 severity grading criteria was significantly higher. Furthermore, a comparison of patients treated with early or urgent biliary drainage versus patients not treated this way showed no difference in 30-day mortality among patients with Grade I or Grade III AC, but significantly lower 30-day mortality in patients with Grade II AC who were treated with early or urgent biliary drainage. This suggests that the TG13 severity grading criteria can be used to identify Grade II patients whose prognoses may be improved through biliary drainage. The TG13 severity grading criteria may therefore be useful as an indicator for biliary drainage as well as a predictive factor when assessing the patient's prognosis. The TG13 diagnostic and severity grading criteria for AC can provide results quickly, are minimally invasive for the patients, and are inexpensive. We recommend that the TG13 criteria be adopted in the TG18 guidelines and used as standard practice in the clinical setting. Free full articles and mobile app of TG18 are available at: http://www.jshbps.jp/modules/en/index.php?content_id=47. Related clinical questions and references are also included.

摘要

尽管 2013 年东京指南(TG13)的诊断和严重程度分级标准被全球用作急性胆管炎(AC)管理的主要标准,但它们需要通过在实际临床实践中的实施和评估来验证。在这里,我们对文献进行了系统回顾,以验证 TG13 对 AC 的诊断和严重程度分级标准,并提出 TG18 标准。虽然很少有证据评估 TG13 标准,但它们通过日本和中国台湾的一项大型病例系列研究得到了验证。分析该研究的大数据证实,基于 TG13 诊断标准的 AC 诊断率高于基于 TG07 标准的诊断率,并且基于 TG13 严重程度分级标准的严重程度较高的患者 30 天死亡率显著更高。此外,比较接受早期或紧急胆道引流与未接受这种治疗的患者的结果表明,在 I 级或 III 级 AC 患者中,30 天死亡率没有差异,但在接受早期或紧急胆道引流的 II 级 AC 患者中,30 天死亡率显著更低。这表明,TG13 严重程度分级标准可用于识别可能通过胆道引流改善预后的 II 级患者。因此,TG13 严重程度分级标准可作为胆道引流的指标以及评估患者预后的预测因素。AC 的 TG13 诊断和严重程度分级标准可以快速提供结果,对患者微创且价格低廉。我们建议在 TG18 指南中采用 TG13 标准,并将其作为临床实践中的标准实践。有关 TG18 的全文和移动应用程序可在以下网址获得:http://www.jshbps.jp/modules/en/index.php?content_id=47。还包括相关的临床问题和参考文献。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验