Suppr超能文献

单光子发射计算机断层扫描骨闪烁显像评估下颌不对称中髁突生长活性:准确吗?

SPECT bone scintigraphy for the assessment of condylar growth activity in mandibular asymmetry: is it accurate?

作者信息

Chan B H, Leung Y Y

机构信息

Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Prince Philip Dental Hospital, Sai Ying Pun, Hong Kong.

Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Prince Philip Dental Hospital, Sai Ying Pun, Hong Kong.

出版信息

Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Apr;47(4):470-479. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2017.09.008. Epub 2017 Oct 9.

Abstract

The comparison of serial radiographs and clinical photographs is considered the current accepted standard for the diagnosis of active condylar hyperplasia in patients with facial asymmetry. Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) has recently been proposed as an alternative method. SPECT can be interpreted using three reported methods absolute difference in uptake, uptake ratio, and relative uptake. SPECT findings were compared to those from serial comparisons of radiographs and clinical photographs taken at the time of SPECT and a year later; the sensitivities and specificities were determined. Two hundred patient scans were evaluated. Thirty-four patients showed active growth on serial growth assessment. On comparison with serial growth assessment, the sensitivity and specificity of the three methods ranged between 32.4% and 67.6%, and 36.1% and 78.3%, respectively. Analysis using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves revealed area under the curve (AUC) values of <0.58. The average age (mean±standard deviation) of patients with active growth was 18.6±2.8 years, and average growth in the anteroposterior, vertical, and transverse directions was 0.94±0.91mm, 0.88±0.86mm, and 1.4±0.66 mm, respectively. With such low sensitivity and specificity values, it is not justifiable to use SPECT in place of serial growth assessment for the determination of condylar growth status.

摘要

连续X线片与临床照片的对比被认为是目前诊断面部不对称患者髁突活动增生的公认标准。单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)最近被提议作为一种替代方法。SPECT可以使用三种报告的方法进行解读:摄取绝对差异、摄取率和相对摄取。将SPECT的结果与SPECT检查时及一年后拍摄的X线片和临床照片的连续对比结果进行比较;确定敏感性和特异性。对200例患者的扫描进行了评估。34例患者在连续生长评估中显示有活动生长。与连续生长评估相比,三种方法的敏感性和特异性分别在32.4%至67.6%和36.1%至78.3%之间。使用受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线分析显示曲线下面积(AUC)值<0.58。有活动生长的患者的平均年龄(均值±标准差)为18.6±2.8岁,前后、垂直和横向方向的平均生长分别为0.94±0.91mm、0.88±0.86mm和1.4±0.66mm。由于敏感性和特异性值如此之低,使用SPECT代替连续生长评估来确定髁突生长状态是不合理的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验