• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重新审视博斯沃思技术和改良的费米斯特技术。关节内与关节外固定方法治疗急性罗克伍德III型肩锁关节脱位的比较。

Bosworth and modified Phemister techniques revisited. A comparison of intraarticular vs extraarticular fixation methods in the treatment of acute Rockwood type III acromioclavicular dislocations.

作者信息

Cetinkaya Engin, Arıkan Yavuz, Beng Kubilay, Mutlu Harun, Yalçınkaya Merter, Üzümcügil Onat

机构信息

Baltalimani Bone and Joint Diseases Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey; Kolan Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.

GOP Taksim Training and Research Hospital Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, İstanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2017 Dec;51(6):455-458. doi: 10.1016/j.aott.2017.09.002. Epub 2017 Oct 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.aott.2017.09.002
PMID:29032901
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6197155/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the long-term clinical and radiological results of Acromioclavicular (AC) fixation with K-wires (the modified Phemister procedure) and Coracoclavicular (CC) fixation with the Bosworth screw in the surgical treatment of Type 3 AC joint dislocations.

METHODS

Thirty-two patients with complete set of medical records and who received surgical treatment between September 2005 and January 2009 due to acute Rockwood Type 3 AC joint dislocation and properly attended their follow-ups were retrospectively evaluated. Sixteen patients (13 males, 3 females; mean age: 38, range: 24-52 years) were treated with CC fixation with Bosworth screw (Group 1), and the other 16 (12 males, 4 females; mean age: 53.3, range: 38-64 years) with AC fixation using K-wires (Group 2).

RESULTS

The mean follow-up time was 96 months for Group 1 and 93 months for Group 2 patients (p > 0.05). The mean Constant-Murley score at the final follow-up was 84.7 in Group 1 and 87.3 in Group 2 (p = 0.069). Radiological evaluation of the patients revealed AC arthrosis in 2 and 3 patients in Group 1 and 2, respectively. In Group 2, one patient had a recurrent dislocation, three patients had AC arthrosis and two patients had ossification in the CC ligament (Fig. 2). There was no superficial or deep wound infection in Group 1, while two patients from Group 2 had a superficial wound infection.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that both techniques are reliable and provide adequate reduction and similar outcomes in terms of functionality and pain levels, following the reduction of Type 3 AC joint dislocations. With lower rates of wound site infection in the early and AC arthrosis in the late postoperative period, CC fixation method with the Bosworth screw may be a better surgical option than AC fixation method with K-wires.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, Therapeutic study.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较克氏针(改良菲米斯特手术)肩锁关节(AC)固定与博斯沃思螺钉喙锁关节(CC)固定在手术治疗3型AC关节脱位中的长期临床和影像学结果。

方法

回顾性评估32例有完整病历且因急性罗克伍德3型AC关节脱位于2005年9月至2009年1月接受手术治疗并按时随访的患者。16例患者(13例男性,3例女性;平均年龄:38岁,范围:24 - 52岁)采用博斯沃思螺钉CC固定(第1组),另外16例(12例男性,4例女性;平均年龄:53.3岁,范围:38 - 64岁)采用克氏针AC固定(第2组)。

结果

第1组患者的平均随访时间为96个月,第2组为93个月(p > 0.05)。末次随访时第1组的平均Constant - Murley评分为84.7,第2组为87.3(p = 0.069)。患者的影像学评估显示,第1组和第2组分别有2例和3例出现AC关节病。在第2组中,1例患者复发性脱位,3例患者出现AC关节病,2例患者CC韧带骨化(图2)。第1组无浅表或深部伤口感染,而第2组有2例患者出现浅表伤口感染。

结论

我们的结果表明,两种技术都可靠,在3型AC关节脱位复位后,在功能和疼痛水平方面都能提供充分复位和相似的结果。博斯沃思螺钉CC固定方法在术后早期伤口感染率较低,后期AC关节病发生率较低,可能是比克氏针AC固定方法更好的手术选择。

证据水平

III级,治疗性研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed0f/6197155/beba248a4151/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed0f/6197155/b70e7e9a904c/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed0f/6197155/beba248a4151/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed0f/6197155/b70e7e9a904c/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed0f/6197155/beba248a4151/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
Bosworth and modified Phemister techniques revisited. A comparison of intraarticular vs extraarticular fixation methods in the treatment of acute Rockwood type III acromioclavicular dislocations.重新审视博斯沃思技术和改良的费米斯特技术。关节内与关节外固定方法治疗急性罗克伍德III型肩锁关节脱位的比较。
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2017 Dec;51(6):455-458. doi: 10.1016/j.aott.2017.09.002. Epub 2017 Oct 9.
2
Is AC TightRope fixation better than Bosworth screw fixation for minimally invasive operative treatment of Rockwood III AC joint injury?对于Rockwood III型肩锁关节损伤的微创治疗,解剖型钛缆固定是否优于Bosworth螺钉固定?
Injury. 2015 Nov;46 Suppl 6:S113-8. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.10.060. Epub 2015 Nov 26.
3
Acromioclavicular joint dislocation treated with Bosworth screw and additional K-wiring: results after 7.8 years - still an adequate procedure?用博斯沃思螺钉及额外克氏针固定治疗肩锁关节脱位:7.8年后的结果——仍是一种合适的方法吗?
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Aug 4;18(1):339. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1692-0.
4
Early clinical and radiographic results of fixation with the TightRope device for Rockwood type V acromioclavicular joint dislocation: A retrospective review of 15 patients.使用TightRope装置固定Rockwood V型肩锁关节脱位的早期临床和影像学结果:15例患者的回顾性研究
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2020 Sep;54(5):473-477. doi: 10.5152/j.aott.2020.18407.
5
Clinical and radiologic outcomes of the modified phemister procedure with coracoclavicular ligament augmentation using mersilene tape versus hook plate fixation for acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation.改良 Phenister 术联合 Mersilene 带喙锁韧带重建与钩钢板固定治疗急性肩锁关节脱位的临床和影像学疗效比较。
BMC Surg. 2022 Oct 29;22(1):370. doi: 10.1186/s12893-022-01808-4.
6
Hybrid coracoclavicular and acromioclavicular reconstruction in chronic acromioclavicular joint dislocations yields good functional and radiographic results.慢性肩锁关节脱位的杂交型肩锁关节和肩峰锁骨关节重建可获得良好的功能和影像学结果。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Jun;30(6):2084-2091. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06790-7. Epub 2021 Nov 29.
7
Long-term stability of coracoclavicular suture fixation for acute acromioclavicular joint separation.喙锁间缝线固定治疗急性肩锁关节分离的长期稳定性。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Jul;29(7):2103-2109. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06158-3. Epub 2020 Jul 20.
8
Coracoclavicular ligament repair and screw fixation in acromioclavicular dislocations.喙锁韧带修复及螺钉固定治疗肩锁关节脱位
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2010;44(3):194-8. doi: 10.3944/AOTT.2010.2329.
9
[Comparative study on the treatment of acromioclavicular joint dislocation: coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction combined with hook plate fixation or suture-anchor fixation].肩锁关节脱位治疗的比较研究:喙锁韧带重建联合钩钢板固定或缝合锚钉固定
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Apr;51(4):349-53.
10
Comparison of hook plate with versus without double-tunnel coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction for repair of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations: A prospective randomized controlled clinical trial.钩钢板与双隧道喙锁韧带重建治疗急性肩锁关节脱位的比较:前瞻性随机对照临床试验。
Int J Surg. 2018 Jun;54(Pt A):18-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.04.017. Epub 2018 Apr 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Functional Outcomes of the Management of Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation With a Clavicle Hook Plate: A Retrospective Study.锁骨钩钢板治疗肩锁关节脱位的功能预后:一项回顾性研究
Cureus. 2024 Nov 18;16(11):e73898. doi: 10.7759/cureus.73898. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
Surgical Advances in the Treatment of Acromioclavicular Joint Injury: A Comprehensive Review.手术治疗肩锁关节损伤的进展:综合评价
Med Sci Monit. 2024 Nov 16;30:e942969. doi: 10.12659/MSM.942969.
3
Choice of Acromioclavicular Dislocation Treatment Should Not Be Influenced by Risk of Development of Acromioclavicular Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
K-wire Arthrodesis and Coracoclavicular Augmentation of Complete Acromioclavicular Separations: Functional and Subjective Results.
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2008 Feb;34(1):43-8. doi: 10.1007/s00068-007-7901-z. Epub 2007 Jul 19.
2
Management of acromioclavicular joint injuries.肩锁关节损伤的处理。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Jan 1;96(1):73-84. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.00734.
3
Evaluation of coracoclavicular stabilization of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation with multistrand titanium cables.多股钛缆对急性肩锁关节脱位喙锁稳定作用的评估
肩锁关节脱位治疗方法的选择不应受肩锁关节炎发展风险的影响:系统评价与荟萃分析。
JBJS Rev. 2024 Sep 3;12(9). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.24.00085. eCollection 2024 Sep 1.
4
Comparison of Effectiveness and Safety in Treating Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation with Five Different Surgical Procedures: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.五种不同手术治疗急性肩锁关节脱位的有效性和安全性比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Orthop Surg. 2023 Aug;15(8):1944-1958. doi: 10.1111/os.13731. Epub 2023 Apr 27.
5
Can a coracoclavicular screw added to the clavicular hook plate reduce subacromial stress? A finite element analysis.锁骨钩板附加喙锁螺钉能否减少肩峰下的应力?一项有限元分析。
Jt Dis Relat Surg. 2022;33(3):609-615. doi: 10.52312/jdrs.2022.837. Epub 2022 Oct 21.
6
Surgical Management of Acute Rockwood Grade III Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocations: A Systematic Review.急性RockwoodⅢ型肩锁关节脱位的手术治疗:一项系统评价
Cureus. 2022 Sep 1;14(9):e28657. doi: 10.7759/cureus.28657. eCollection 2022 Sep.
7
Does coracoclavicular augmentation additional to hook plate fixation provide benefits in acute unstable acromioclavicular dislocation? A meta-analysis.除钩钢板固定外,喙锁韧带增强术对急性不稳定肩锁关节脱位是否有益?一项荟萃分析。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Mar 4;23(1):205. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05142-x.
8
Treatment of acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint dislocation.急性重度肩锁关节脱位的治疗
Clin Shoulder Elb. 2020 Sep 1;23(3):159-165. doi: 10.5397/cise.2020.00150. eCollection 2020 Sep.
9
Biologic and synthetic ligament reconstructions achieve better functional scores compared to osteosynthesis in the treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation.生物性和合成性韧带重建术在治疗急性肩锁关节脱位方面比骨愈合术能获得更好的功能评分。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Jul;29(7):2175-2193. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06217-9. Epub 2020 Aug 14.
10
The frequency of reduction loss after arthroscopic fixation of acute acromioclavicular dislocations using a double-button device, and its effect on clinical and radiological results.关节镜下使用双纽扣装置固定急性肩锁关节脱位后复位丢失的频率及其对临床和影像学结果的影响。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Apr 8;15(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01674-x.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2014 Oct;24(7):1061-6. doi: 10.1007/s00590-013-1385-9. Epub 2013 Dec 11.
4
Current state of treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint injuries in Germany: is there a difference between specialists and non-specialists? A survey of German trauma and orthopaedic departments.德国急性肩锁关节损伤的治疗现状:专科医生与非专科医生之间存在差异吗?一项针对德国创伤与骨科科室的调查。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015 May;23(5):1447-1452. doi: 10.1007/s00167-013-2795-2. Epub 2013 Dec 4.
5
Changes in surgical procedures for acromioclavicular joint dislocation over the past 30 years.
Orthopedics. 2013 Oct 1;36(10):e1277-82. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20130920-20.
6
Management of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations: current concepts.急性肩锁关节脱位的治疗:现状。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2013 Jul;133(7):985-95. doi: 10.1007/s00402-013-1748-z. Epub 2013 Apr 30.
7
Current concepts in the treatment of acromioclavicular joint dislocations.当前治疗肩锁关节脱位的理念。
Arthroscopy. 2013 Feb;29(2):387-97. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2012.11.023.
8
Acromioclavicular motion after surgical reconstruction.手术后肩锁关节运动。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012 Jun;20(6):1012-8. doi: 10.1007/s00167-011-1627-5. Epub 2011 Aug 3.
9
Long-term results of the surgical treatment of type III acromioclavicular dislocations: an update of a previous report.Ⅲ型肩锁关节脱位手术治疗的长期结果:既往报告的更新
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011 Aug;93(8):1088-92. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.93B8.26775.
10
The use of hook plate in type III and V acromio-clavicular Rockwood dislocations: clinical and radiological midterm results and MRI evaluation in 42 patients.钩钢板治疗Ⅲ型和Ⅴ型肩锁关节 Rockwood 脱位:42 例的临床和放射学中期结果及 MRI 评估
Injury. 2012 Feb;43(2):147-52. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.04.002. Epub 2011 May 17.