Division of Endodontics, Department of Oral Rehabilitation, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
J Endod. 2018 Jan;44(1):14-21. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2017.08.002. Epub 2017 Oct 21.
Techniques and armamentarium for intentional replantation have varied throughout the years with no universally accepted clinical treatment guidelines. A wide range of success rates has been reported, and accordingly, this treatment method has often been regarded as a treatment of last resort. However, recent studies have shown more consistent success rates as high as 88% to 95%. In light of these new studies, intentional replantation may now be considered a more commonly accepted treatment modality. The purpose of this review was to critically examine reported techniques for intentional replantation.
A search of the literature on intentional replantation techniques was performed using electronic databases including PubMed, Medline, and Scopus. A total of 3183 articles were generated and screened for relevance based on defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Subsequently, 27 studies were included for critical review of technique.
There has been an evolution in technique for intentional replantation over the decades.
Numerous aspects of the procedure exhibit variations, whereas other aspects exhibit considerable consistency. Few studies reported techniques consistent with modern endodontic surgical principles.
多年来，对于有目的的再植术，其技术和设备一直在变化，但是没有普遍接受的临床治疗指南。已经报道了广泛的成功率，因此，这种治疗方法通常被认为是最后的治疗手段。然而，最近的研究表明，成功率更高，高达 88%至 95%。鉴于这些新的研究，有目的的再植术现在可能被认为是一种更被广泛接受的治疗方式。本综述的目的是批判性地检查有目的的再植术的报告技术。
使用电子数据库（包括 PubMed、Medline 和 Scopus）对有目的的再植技术文献进行了检索。共生成了 3183 篇文章，并根据定义的纳入和排除标准对其相关性进行了筛选。随后，有 27 项研究被纳入技术的关键审查。
几十年来，有目的的再植术的技术一直在发展。
该过程的许多方面存在差异，而其他方面则具有相当的一致性。很少有研究报告的技术与现代牙髓外科原则一致。
