Department of Ophthalmology, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City, Taiwan, ROC.
Graduate Institute of Injury Prevention and Control, College of Public Health, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
J Chin Med Assoc. 2018 Apr;81(4):376-382. doi: 10.1016/j.jcma.2017.08.011. Epub 2017 Oct 21.
Visual impairment (VI) and hearing impairment (HI) are the two most common types of sensory disability encountered clinically. However, VI and HI result in different limitations in daily life. We assessed the level of functioning in patients with VI or HI based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health.
This nationwide, cross-sectional study included 312 people with VI and 540 people with HI. Each participant's degree of functioning and disability was evaluated using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0). The standardized WHODAS 2.0 scores ranged from 0 (least difficulty) to 100 (most difficulty).
Patients with VI and those with HI had a mean (±standard error) 32-item WHODAS 2.0 score of 42.4 ± 2.9 and 27.1 ± 1.6, respectively. The degree of restriction was positively related to the level of VI. Specifically, the patients with VI and a WHODAS 2.0 score of 33.7-35.3 or higher were likely to experience barriers to accessing mobility products, communication products, and education products. Furthermore, patients with a score of 42.9 or higher might experience barriers to accessing ingestion products and living products.
WHODAS 2.0 scores are strongly correlated with the severity of VI. Mild VI should be targeted for treatment and referral as early as possible. Compared with the patients with HI, the patients with VI more frequently experience barriers to accessing environmental factors.
视觉障碍(VI)和听力障碍(HI)是临床上最常见的两种感觉残疾类型。然而,VI 和 HI 导致日常生活中的不同限制。我们根据国际功能、残疾和健康分类评估 VI 或 HI 患者的功能水平。
这项全国性的横断面研究纳入了 312 名 VI 患者和 540 名 HI 患者。每位参与者的功能和残疾程度均使用世界卫生组织残疾评定量表 2.0(WHODAS 2.0)进行评估。标准化的 WHODAS 2.0 评分范围为 0(最容易)至 100(最难)。
VI 患者和 HI 患者的平均(±标准误差)32 项 WHODAS 2.0 评分为 42.4±2.9 和 27.1±1.6。受限程度与 VI 的严重程度呈正相关。具体来说,WHODAS 2.0 评分为 33.7-35.3 或更高的 VI 患者可能会在获取移动产品、通讯产品和教育产品方面遇到障碍。此外,评分为 42.9 或更高的患者可能会在获取摄入产品和生活产品方面遇到障碍。
WHODAS 2.0 评分与 VI 的严重程度密切相关。应尽早对轻度 VI 进行治疗和转介。与 HI 患者相比,VI 患者更频繁地在获取环境因素方面遇到障碍。