• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同垂直面部维度患者的下颌牙槽骨体积

Mandibular alveolar bone volume in patients with different vertical facial dimensions.

作者信息

Alkhadra Thamer

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, P.O. Box 60169, Riyadh 11545, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Saudi Dent J. 2017 Oct;29(4):140-143. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2017.07.002. Epub 2017 Aug 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.sdentj.2017.07.002
PMID:29033522
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5634793/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate if there is any difference in alveolar bone surface area in patients with high vertical facial dimension (long face), average vertical facial dimension (average face), and low vertical facial dimension (square short face).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-five patients who had cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) as part of their orthodontic records were chosen according to their facial vertical dimension. Each group consisted of fifteen patients. Mandibular alveolar bone volume was calculated using Dolphin 3D Imaging software as the total surface area of the symphysis at the level of lower right canine to lower left canine and total surface areas for each patient was considered as total bone volume. Comparison was performed between groups using -test.

RESULTS

Long face type patients showed higher bone volume (total surface area 3220 ± 368 mm), average face patients have average bone volume (total surface area 2059 ± 620 mm) while square short face patients have the lowest total bone volume (total surface area 1877 ± 112 mm). There was a significant difference between long face and square short face groups (P < 0.005) however, there was no significant difference between long face and average face groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with long face type have higher mandibular alveolar bone volume compared to short facial type patients.

摘要

目的

评估高垂直面部比例(长脸)、平均垂直面部比例(平均脸)和低垂直面部比例(方形短脸)患者的牙槽骨表面积是否存在差异。

材料与方法

根据面部垂直比例,从45例正畸记录中有锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)的患者中选取。每组15例患者。使用Dolphin 3D成像软件计算下颌牙槽骨体积,即右下尖牙至左下尖牙水平处联合部的总表面积,每位患者的总表面积视为总骨体积。使用t检验进行组间比较。

结果

长脸型患者的骨体积较高(总表面积3220±368mm),平均脸患者的骨体积为中等(总表面积2059±620mm),而方形短脸患者的总骨体积最低(总表面积1877±112mm)。长脸组和方形短脸组之间存在显著差异(P<0.005),然而,长脸组和平均脸组之间没有显著差异。

结论

与短脸型患者相比,长脸型患者的下颌牙槽骨体积更高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2ed/5634793/94657ca2c569/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2ed/5634793/692d8c941827/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2ed/5634793/94657ca2c569/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2ed/5634793/692d8c941827/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2ed/5634793/94657ca2c569/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
Mandibular alveolar bone volume in patients with different vertical facial dimensions.不同垂直面部维度患者的下颌牙槽骨体积
Saudi Dent J. 2017 Oct;29(4):140-143. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2017.07.002. Epub 2017 Aug 2.
2
Cross-sectional human mandibular morphology as assessed in vivo by cone-beam computed tomography in patients with different vertical facial dimensions.不同垂直面型患者的锥形束 CT 活体测量下颌骨的横断形态。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Apr;139(4 Suppl):e377-89. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.10.039.
3
[Measurement of alveolar bone thickness of adult skeletal Class III patients in mandibular anterior region].[成年骨性III类患者下颌前部区域牙槽骨厚度的测量]
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2012 Aug;21(4):422-6.
4
Alveolar bone mapping in subjects with different vertical facial dimensions.不同垂直面部维度受试者的牙槽骨测绘
Eur J Orthod. 2015 Apr;37(2):194-201. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cju034. Epub 2014 Aug 11.
5
Evaluation of maxillary sinus volume and dimensions in different vertical face growth patterns: a study of cone-beam computed tomography.不同垂直面部生长模式下上颌窦容积和尺寸的评估:锥形束计算机断层扫描研究
Acta Odontol Scand. 2017 Jul;75(5):345-349. doi: 10.1080/00016357.2017.1310294. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
6
Computed tomography evaluation of mandibular incisor bony support in untreated patients.未治疗患者下颌切牙骨支持的计算机断层评估。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Aug;138(2):179-87. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.09.030.
7
[Analysis of cortical density in zygomatic alveolar ridge of different vertical facial types].[不同垂直面型颧骨牙槽嵴皮质骨密度分析]
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2019 Dec;28(6):652-656.
8
Alveolar and skeletal dimensions associated with lower face height.与下颌面部高度相关的牙槽和骨骼尺寸。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998 May;113(5):498-506. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(98)70260-4.
9
Differences in the mandibular premolar positions in Angle Class I subjects with different vertical facial types: A cone-beam computed tomography study.不同垂直面型安氏Ⅰ类患者下颌前磨牙位置的差异:一项锥形束计算机断层扫描研究
Korean J Orthod. 2015 Jul;45(4):180-9. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2015.45.4.180. Epub 2015 Jul 24.
10
Evaluation of condylar cortical bone thickness in patient groups with different vertical facial dimensions using cone-beam computed tomography.应用锥形束 CT 评估不同垂直面型患者髁突皮质骨厚度。
Odontology. 2020 Oct;108(4):669-675. doi: 10.1007/s10266-020-00510-2. Epub 2020 Mar 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Three-dimensional evaluation of the cortical and cancellous bone density and thickness for miniscrew insertion: a CBCT study of interradicular area of adults with different facial growth pattern.成人不同面型生长类型磨牙间区植入区皮质骨和松质骨密度及厚度的三维评估:CBCT 研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Oct 13;23(1):753. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03440-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Cross-sectional human mandibular morphology as assessed in vivo by cone-beam computed tomography in patients with different vertical facial dimensions.不同垂直面型患者的锥形束 CT 活体测量下颌骨的横断形态。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Apr;139(4 Suppl):e377-89. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.10.039.
2
The effect of cortical bone thickness on the stability of orthodontic mini-implants and on the stress distribution in surrounding bone.皮质骨厚度对正畸微型种植体稳定性及周围骨应力分布的影响。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Jan;38(1):13-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2008.09.006. Epub 2008 Oct 28.
3
Using the finite element method to model the biomechanics of the asymmetric mandible before, during and after skeletal correction by distraction osteogenesis.
采用有限元方法对牵张成骨进行骨骼矫正之前、期间及之后不对称下颌骨的生物力学进行建模。
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2005 Jun;8(3):157-65. doi: 10.1080/10255840500237953.
4
Masticatory demands induce region-specific changes in mandibular bone density in growing rats.咀嚼需求会导致生长中大鼠下颌骨密度出现区域特异性变化。
Angle Orthod. 2005 Jul;75(4):625-30. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2005)75[625:MDIRCI]2.0.CO;2.
5
Mechanical strain on the human skull in a humanoid robotic model.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004 Oct;126(4):421-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.02.009.
6
Effect of different masticatory functional and mechanical demands on the structural adaptation of the mandibular alveolar bone in young growing rats.不同咀嚼功能和机械负荷对幼年生长大鼠下颌牙槽骨结构适应性的影响。
Bone. 2004 Jul;35(1):191-7. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2004.03.020.
7
Measurement of mechanical strain on mandibular surface with mastication robot: influence of muscle loading direction and magnitude.使用咀嚼机器人测量下颌表面的机械应变:肌肉加载方向和大小的影响。
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2003;6 Suppl 1:163-7; discussion 179-82. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0544.2003.250.x.
8
The transfer of occlusal forces through the maxillary molars: a finite element study.通过上颌磨牙传递咬合力量:一项有限元研究。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003 Apr;123(4):367-73. doi: 10.1067/mod.2003.73.
9
Effects of masticatory muscle function and bite-raising on mandibular morphology in the growing rat.咀嚼肌功能及咬合力增强对生长中大鼠下颌形态的影响。
Swed Dent J Suppl. 2001(150):1-49.
10
A three-dimensional, quantitative computed tomographic study of changes in distribution of bone mineralization in the developing human mandible.
Arch Oral Biol. 2001 Jul;46(7):667-78. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9969(01)00006-1.