Parretti Helen M, Bartington Suzanne E, Badcock Tim, Hughes Lucy, Duda Joan L, Jolly Kate
Institute of Applied Health Research.
School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, UK.
Pragmat Obs Res. 2017 Sep 21;8:189-201. doi: 10.2147/POR.S118648. eCollection 2017.
Primary care exercise referral schemes (ERSs) are a potentially useful setting to promote physical activity (PA). It is not established, however, whether interventions to increase PA, such as ERSs, have differing health outcomes according to the participants' body mass index (BMI). This paper summarizes evidence for the impact of primary care ERSs on the health of people with obesity and reports findings of a reanalysis of the EMPOWER study, providing the first data to report differential outcomes of ERSs by BMI category. Our literature review revealed a paucity of published data. A 2011 Health Technology Assessment review and 2015 update were identified, but normal-weight participants were neither excluded nor were results stratified by weight in the included studies. A study of the effect of exercise referral in overweight women reported a significantly greater increase in PA levels in the ERS group than the control group at 3 months. Reanalysis of the EMPOWER study data showed a significant improvement in PA at 3 months in both obese and overweight/normal BMI groups, with the effect size attenuated to 6 months. There was no significant difference from baseline to 6 months in blood pressure for either BMI category. At 6 months, there was a significant decrease in weight from baseline for the obese category. Comparison of crude mean differences between BMI groups revealed a significant mean difference in PA at 3 months favoring the overweight/normal BMI group, but not at 6 months. There were no further significant differences in unadjusted or adjusted mean differences for other outcomes at follow-up. We report some evidence of a differential impact of ERS on PA by BMI category. However, the effect of ERSs in primary care for patients with obesity remains unclear due to the small number of published studies that have reported outcomes by BMI category. Further research is needed.
基层医疗运动转诊计划(ERSs)是促进身体活动(PA)的一个潜在有用途径。然而,增加PA的干预措施,如ERSs,是否会根据参与者的体重指数(BMI)产生不同的健康结果,目前尚无定论。本文总结了基层医疗ERSs对肥胖人群健康影响的证据,并报告了对EMPOWER研究重新分析的结果,提供了首份按BMI类别报告ERSs不同结果的数据。我们的文献综述发现已发表的数据很少。我们找到了2011年的一项卫生技术评估综述及其2015年的更新内容,但纳入研究中既未排除体重正常的参与者,结果也未按体重分层。一项关于运动转诊对超重女性影响的研究报告称,在3个月时,ERS组的PA水平增幅显著高于对照组。对EMPOWER研究数据的重新分析显示,肥胖组和超重/正常BMI组在3个月时的PA均有显著改善,且这种效果在6个月时减弱。两个BMI类别从基线到6个月时血压均无显著差异。在6个月时,肥胖类别组的体重较基线有显著下降。BMI组间粗均数差异比较显示,在3个月时PA存在显著的均数差异,有利于超重/正常BMI组,但在6个月时并非如此。随访时其他结局的未调整或调整后均数差异均无进一步显著差异。我们报告了一些证据表明ERS对PA的影响因BMI类别而异。然而,由于按BMI类别报告结局的已发表研究数量较少,ERS在基层医疗中对肥胖患者的效果仍不明确。需要进一步研究。