Şentürk Cankorur Vesile, Demirel Hilal, Atbaşoğlu Cem
Department of Psychiatry, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Private Practice, Psychology, Ankara, Turkey.
Noro Psikiyatr Ars. 2017 Sep;54(3):244-250. doi: 10.5152/npa.2017.15883. Epub 2016 Sep 1.
Bipolar disorder is associated with cognitive dysfunction in several domains. Medication effect is a potential confounder that can only be statistically controlled in many studies. The cognitive profile in bipolar disorder during remission on maintenance antipsychotics or mood stabilizers medication has not been compared before.
We compared the cognitive profile of bipolar disorder patients euthymic for 2 month or more on monotherapy with novel antipsychotics (AP) (n=16), lithium carbonate (Li) (n=25) or valproic acid (VPA; n=26). Forty-two individuals were assessed as controls. The cognitive battery included Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised (WAIS-R) subtests, the Wechsler Memory Scale (WMS), and Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST).
All three patient groups compared to controls performed poorly on the working memory and verbal memory tasks (F=3.59, df=3, p=0.02 for WAIS-R Arithmetic and F=123.64, df=3, p<0.01 for WMS Logical Memory). The differences remained significant after controlling for age. Across patients, the only significant difference was between the Li and AP groups in terms of working memory. The Li group performed better (F=3.59, df=2, p=0.02) and the difference survived correction for age and clinical features.
The findings of this study suggest that working memory impairment in bipolar patients on monotherapy with atypical AP, whereas verbal memory impairment might be related to bipolar disorder itself. Working memory might be a state marker, whereas verbal memory could be a trait marker of bipolar disorder. Atypical AP might have an adverse effect on cognition in bipolar disorder. These findings cannot be generalized to all bipolar patients, particularly the poor responders to monotherapy.
双相情感障碍与多个领域的认知功能障碍有关。药物效应是一个潜在的混杂因素,在许多研究中只能进行统计学控制。此前尚未对双相情感障碍患者在维持性抗精神病药物或心境稳定剂治疗缓解期的认知特征进行比较。
我们比较了接受新型抗精神病药物(AP)单药治疗(n = 16)、碳酸锂(Li)(n = 25)或丙戊酸(VPA;n = 26)且病情稳定2个月或更长时间的双相情感障碍患者的认知特征。42名个体被评估为对照组。认知测试组合包括韦氏成人智力量表修订版(WAIS-R)子测验、韦氏记忆量表(WMS)和威斯康星卡片分类测验(WCST)。
与对照组相比,所有三个患者组在工作记忆和言语记忆任务上表现较差(WAIS-R算术测验F = 3.59,自由度= 3,p = 0.02;WMS逻辑记忆测验F = 123.64,自由度= 3,p < 0.01)。在控制年龄后,差异仍然显著。在所有患者中,仅在工作记忆方面,Li组和AP组之间存在显著差异。Li组表现更好(F = 3.59,自由度= 2,p = 0.02),这种差异在对年龄和临床特征进行校正后仍然存在。
本研究结果表明,接受非典型AP单药治疗的双相情感障碍患者存在工作记忆损害,而言语记忆损害可能与双相情感障碍本身有关。工作记忆可能是一种状态标记,而言语记忆可能是双相情感障碍的一种特质标记。非典型AP可能对双相情感障碍患者的认知有不良影响。这些发现不能推广到所有双相情感障碍患者,尤其是对单药治疗反应不佳的患者。