• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癌症女性生育力保存决策辅助网站的开发和现场测试。

The Pathways fertility preservation decision aid website for women with cancer: development and field testing.

机构信息

Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1155 Pressler Street, Unit 1362, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.

Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine, 1 Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.

出版信息

J Cancer Surviv. 2018 Feb;12(1):101-114. doi: 10.1007/s11764-017-0649-5. Epub 2017 Oct 15.

DOI:10.1007/s11764-017-0649-5
PMID:29034438
Abstract

PURPOSE

To improve survivors' awareness and knowledge of fertility preservation counseling and treatment options, this study engaged survivors and providers to design, develop, and field-test Pathways: a fertility preservation patient decision aid website for young women with cancer©.

METHODS

Using an adapted user-centered design process, our stakeholder advisory group and research team designed and optimized the Pathways patient decision aid website through four iterative cycles of review and revision with clinicians (n = 21) and survivors (n = 14). Field-testing (n = 20 survivors) assessed post-decision aid scores on the Fertility Preservation Knowledge Scale, feasibility of assessing women's decision-making values while using the website, and website usability/acceptability ratings.

RESULTS

Iterative stakeholder engagement optimized the Pathways decision aid website to meet survivors' and providers' needs, including providing patient-friendly information and novel features such as interactive value clarification exercises, testimonials that model shared decision making, financial/referral resources, and a printable personal summary. Survivors scored an average of 8.2 out of 13 (SD 1.6) on the Fertility Preservation Knowledge Scale. They rated genetic screening and having a biological child as strong factors in their decision-making, and 71% indicated a preference for egg freezing. Most women (> 85%) rated Pathways favorably, and all women (100%) said they would recommend it to other women.

CONCLUSIONS

The Pathways decision aid is a usable and acceptable tool to help women learn about fertility preservation.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

The Pathways decision aid may help women make well-informed values-based decisions and prevent future infertility-related distress.

摘要

目的

为了提高生存者对生育力保存咨询和治疗选择的认识和了解,本研究邀请生存者和提供者共同设计、开发和现场测试了“Pathways:癌症年轻女性生育力保存决策辅助工具网站©”。

方法

使用适应性的以用户为中心的设计过程,我们的利益相关者顾问小组和研究团队与临床医生(n=21)和生存者(n=14)一起通过四个迭代周期的审查和修订,对 Pathways 生育力保存决策辅助工具网站进行了设计和优化。现场测试(n=20 名生存者)评估了决策辅助工具后的生育力保存知识量表评分、在使用网站时评估女性决策价值观的可行性,以及网站的可用性/可接受性评分。

结果

迭代式的利益相关者参与优化了 Pathways 决策辅助工具网站,以满足生存者和提供者的需求,包括提供患者友好的信息和新颖的功能,如互动价值澄清练习、展示共同决策的案例、财务/推荐资源,以及可打印的个人总结。生存者在生育力保存知识量表上的平均得分为 13 分中的 8.2 分(标准差 1.6)。她们将基因筛查和拥有生物学后代评为决策中的重要因素,71%的人表示倾向于进行卵子冷冻。大多数女性(>85%)对 Pathways 评价良好,所有女性(100%)表示愿意将其推荐给其他女性。

结论

Pathways 决策辅助工具是一种可用且可接受的工具,可帮助女性了解生育力保存。

对癌症生存者的影响

Pathways 决策辅助工具可能有助于女性做出明智的基于价值观的决策,并预防未来与不孕相关的困扰。

相似文献

1
The Pathways fertility preservation decision aid website for women with cancer: development and field testing.癌症女性生育力保存决策辅助网站的开发和现场测试。
J Cancer Surviv. 2018 Feb;12(1):101-114. doi: 10.1007/s11764-017-0649-5. Epub 2017 Oct 15.
2
Patients' and Providers' Needs and Preferences When Considering Fertility Preservation Before Cancer Treatment: Decision-Making Needs Assessment.癌症治疗前考虑生育力保存时患者与医疗服务提供者的需求及偏好:决策需求评估
JMIR Form Res. 2021 Jun 7;5(6):e25083. doi: 10.2196/25083.
3
: patient-centred decision counselling for women at risk of cancer-related infertility: a protocol for a comparative effectiveness cluster randomised trial.针对有癌症相关不孕症风险女性的以患者为中心的决策咨询:一项比较效果整群随机试验方案
BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 21;8(2):e019994. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019994.
4
Developing a Web-Based Shared Decision-Making Tool for Fertility Preservation Among Reproductive-Age Women With Breast Cancer: An Action Research Approach.开发基于网络的乳腺癌育龄期女性生育力保存决策支持工具:行动研究方法。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Mar 17;23(3):e24926. doi: 10.2196/24926.
5
Are publicly available internet resources enabling women to make informed fertility preservation decisions before starting cancer treatment: an environmental scan?公开可用的互联网资源是否使女性能够在开始癌症治疗前做出明智的生育力保留决策:环境扫描?
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2018 Nov 19;18(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s12911-018-0698-3.
6
The "Begin Exploring Fertility Options, Risks and Expectations" (BEFORE) decision aid: development and alpha testing of a fertility tool for premenopausal breast cancer patients.《开始探索生育选择、风险和期望》(BEFORE)决策辅助工具:用于绝经前乳腺癌患者的生育工具的开发和初步测试。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Oct 28;19(1):203. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-0912-y.
7
What factors hinder the decision-making process for women with cancer and contemplating fertility preservation treatment?哪些因素会阻碍患有癌症并考虑进行生育力保存治疗的女性做出决策?
Hum Reprod Update. 2017 Jul 1;23(4):433-457. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmx009.
8
A comparison of heterosexual and LGBTQ cancer survivors' outlooks on relationships, family building, possible infertility, and patient-doctor fertility risk communication.异性恋和LGBTQ癌症幸存者对恋爱关系、组建家庭、可能的不孕不育以及医患之间生育风险沟通的看法比较。
J Cancer Surviv. 2016 Oct;10(5):935-42. doi: 10.1007/s11764-016-0524-9. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
9
Young Adult Female Cancer Survivors' Decision Regret About Fertility Preservation.年轻成年女性癌症幸存者对生育力保存的决策遗憾。
J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2015 Dec;4(4):213-8. doi: 10.1089/jayao.2015.0002.
10
Randomized controlled trial on the effect of an online decision aid for young female cancer patients regarding fertility preservation.随机对照试验研究在线决策辅助工具对年轻女性癌症患者生育力保存的效果。
Hum Reprod. 2019 Sep 29;34(9):1726-1734. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dez136.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and pilot testing of a personalised decision aid for decision-making regarding fertility preservation in young female patients with cancer: a study protocol.针对年轻癌症女性患者生育力保存决策的个性化决策辅助工具的开发与预试验:一项研究方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 12;15(8):e090759. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090759.
2
A scoping review of trauma-informed care principles applied in design and technology.对应用于设计与技术领域的创伤知情护理原则的范围综述。
Digit Health. 2025 Jul 28;11:20552076251360925. doi: 10.1177/20552076251360925. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
3
Knowledge and intentions to use fertility preservation among urban Chinese cancer patients: A study from Hong Kong.

本文引用的文献

1
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.为面临医疗治疗或筛查决策的人们提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 12;4(4):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub5.
2
Involving members of vulnerable populations in the development of patient decision aids: a mixed methods sequential explanatory study.让弱势群体成员参与患者决策辅助工具的开发:一项混合方法的序贯解释性研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017 Jan 19;17(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12911-016-0399-8.
3
User-centered design and the development of patient decision aids: protocol for a systematic review.
香港地区城市癌症患者对生育力保存知识的了解和使用意愿:一项研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 11;19(9):e0307715. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307715. eCollection 2024.
4
Meaningful consumer involvement in cancer care: a systematic review on co-design methods and processes.有意义的消费者参与癌症护理:关于共同设计方法和流程的系统评价。
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2024 Jul 1;8(4). doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkae048.
5
Exploring the experiences and priorities of women with a diagnosis of ovarian cancer.探讨被诊断为卵巢癌的女性的经历和优先事项。
Support Care Cancer. 2023 Jun 30;31(7):432. doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-07903-3.
6
Development, Usability Testing, and Implementation Assessment of Cancer Related Infertility Score Predictor, an Online Cancer Related Infertility Risk Counseling Tool.开发、可用性测试和实施评估癌症相关不孕评分预测器,一种在线癌症相关不孕风险咨询工具。
J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2023 Dec;12(6):843-850. doi: 10.1089/jayao.2022.0187. Epub 2023 May 12.
7
Assessing gaps in motherhood after cancer: development and psychometric testing of the Survivorship Oncofertility Barriers Scale.评估癌症后母亲身份方面的差距:生育力保存障碍量表的编制与心理测量学测试
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2023 May 1;33(5):778-785. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2023-004302.
8
Effectiveness and feasibility of online fertility preservation decision aids for young female patients with cancer: a systematic review protocol.在线生育力保存决策辅助工具对年轻女性癌症患者的有效性和可行性的系统评价方案
BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 20;13(3):e070294. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070294.
9
Pilot trial of iBDecide: Evaluating an online tool to facilitate shared decision making for adolescents and young adults with ulcerative colitis.iBDecide 初步试验:评估一种在线工具,以促进患有溃疡性结肠炎的青少年和年轻成年人的共同决策。
Health Expect. 2022 Dec;25(6):3105-3113. doi: 10.1111/hex.13618. Epub 2022 Sep 26.
10
The Application of Human-Centered Design Approaches in Health Research and Innovation: A Narrative Review of Current Practices.以人为本的设计方法在健康研究和创新中的应用:当前实践的叙述性综述。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Dec 6;9(12):e28102. doi: 10.2196/28102.
以用户为中心的设计与患者决策辅助工具的开发:一项系统评价方案
Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 26;4(1):11. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-4-11.
4
Launching a virtual decision lab: development and field-testing of a web-based patient decision support research platform.启动虚拟决策实验室:基于网络的患者决策支持研究平台的开发与实地测试
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2014 Dec 12;14:112. doi: 10.1186/s12911-014-0112-8.
5
The role of radiation oncologists and discussion of fertility preservation in young cancer patients.放射肿瘤学家的角色以及年轻癌症患者生育力保存的讨论。
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2012 Oct-Dec;2(4):242-247. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2011.12.001. Epub 2012 Jan 26.
6
Do personal stories make patient decision aids more effective? A critical review of theory and evidence.个人故事是否使患者决策辅助工具更有效?理论与证据的批判性回顾。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S9. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-S2-S9. Epub 2013 Nov 29.
7
Delivering patient decision aids on the Internet: definitions, theories, current evidence, and emerging research areas.互联网上提供患者决策辅助工具:定义、理论、现有证据和新兴研究领域。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S13. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-S2-S13. Epub 2013 Nov 29.
8
Addressing health literacy in patient decision aids.解决患者决策辅助工具中的健康素养问题。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S10. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-S2-S10. Epub 2013 Nov 29.
9
Ten years of the International Patient Decision Aid Standards Collaboration: evolution of the core dimensions for assessing the quality of patient decision aids.国际患者决策辅助标准协作十年:评估患者决策辅助工具质量的核心维度的演变。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S1. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-S2-S1. Epub 2013 Nov 29.
10
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.为面临健康治疗或筛查决策的人群提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 28(1):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub4.