Hoffman Aubri S, Llewellyn-Thomas Hilary A, Tosteson Anna N A, O'Connor Annette M, Volk Robert J, Tomek Ivan M, Andrews Steven B, Bartels Stephen J
Dartmouth Centers for Health and Aging, Department of Community and Family Medicine, The Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, 46 Centerra Parkway (HB7250), Lebanon, NH, 03766, USA.
Department of Community and Family Medicine, The Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, One Medical Center Drive (HB7250), Hanover, NH, 03755, USA.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2014 Dec 12;14:112. doi: 10.1186/s12911-014-0112-8.
Over 100 trials show that patient decision aids effectively improve patients' information comprehension and values-based decision making. However, gaps remain in our understanding of several fundamental and applied questions, particularly related to the design of interactive, personalized decision aids. This paper describes an interdisciplinary development process for, and early field testing of, a web-based patient decision support research platform, or virtual decision lab, to address these questions.
An interdisciplinary stakeholder panel designed the web-based research platform with three components: a) an introduction to shared decision making, b) a web-based patient decision aid, and c) interactive data collection items. Iterative focus groups provided feedback on paper drafts and online prototypes. A field test assessed a) feasibility for using the research platform, in terms of recruitment, usage, and acceptability; and b) feasibility of using the web-based decision aid component, compared to performance of a videobooklet decision aid in clinical care.
This interdisciplinary, theory-based, patient-centered design approach produced a prototype for field-testing in six months. Participants (n = 126) reported that: the decision aid component was easy to use (98%), information was clear (90%), the length was appropriate (100%), it was appropriately detailed (90%), and it held their interest (97%). They spent a mean of 36 minutes using the decision aid and 100% preferred using their home/library computer. Participants scored a mean of 75% correct on the Decision Quality, Knowledge Subscale, and 74 out of 100 on the Preparation for Decision Making Scale. Completing the web-based decision aid reduced mean Decisional Conflict scores from 31.1 to 19.5 (p < 0.01).
Combining decision science and health informatics approaches facilitated rapid development of a web-based patient decision support research platform that was feasible for use in research studies in terms of recruitment, acceptability, and usage. Within this platform, the web-based decision aid component performed comparably with the videobooklet decision aid used in clinical practice. Future studies may use this interactive research platform to study patients' decision making processes in real-time, explore interdisciplinary approaches to designing web-based decision aids, and test strategies for tailoring decision support to meet patients' needs and preferences.
超过100项试验表明,患者决策辅助工具能有效提高患者的信息理解能力和基于价值观的决策能力。然而,在我们对几个基本和应用问题的理解上仍存在差距,特别是与交互式、个性化决策辅助工具的设计相关的问题。本文描述了一个基于网络的患者决策支持研究平台或虚拟决策实验室的跨学科开发过程及早期现场测试,以解决这些问题。
一个跨学科利益相关者小组设计了这个基于网络的研究平台,它有三个组成部分:a)共享决策的介绍,b)基于网络的患者决策辅助工具,c)交互式数据收集项目。迭代焦点小组对纸质草稿和在线原型提供了反馈。一项现场测试评估了:a)就招募、使用和可接受性而言,使用该研究平台的可行性;b)与临床护理中使用的视频手册决策辅助工具的性能相比,使用基于网络的决策辅助工具组件的可行性。
这种跨学科、基于理论、以患者为中心的设计方法在六个月内产生了一个用于现场测试的原型。参与者(n = 126)报告称:决策辅助工具组件易于使用(98%)、信息清晰(90%)、长度合适(100%)、细节适当(90%)且能吸引他们的兴趣(97%)。他们使用决策辅助工具的平均时间为36分钟,100%的人更喜欢使用家里/图书馆的电脑。参与者在决策质量知识子量表上的平均正确率为75%,在决策准备量表上的得分为74分(满分100分)。完成基于网络的决策辅助工具后,决策冲突平均得分从31.1降至19.5(p < 0.01)。
结合决策科学和健康信息学方法促进了基于网络的患者决策支持研究平台的快速开发,该平台在招募、可接受性和使用方面可用于研究。在这个平台内,基于网络的决策辅助工具组件与临床实践中使用的视频手册决策辅助工具表现相当。未来的研究可以使用这个交互式研究平台实时研究患者的决策过程,探索设计基于网络的决策辅助工具的跨学科方法,并测试为满足患者需求和偏好而定制决策支持的策略。