• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

制度比较的决策理论。

Decision theory for comparing institutions.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Imperial College, London, UK.

出版信息

Stat Med. 2018 Feb 10;37(3):457-472. doi: 10.1002/sim.7525. Epub 2017 Oct 16.

DOI:10.1002/sim.7525
PMID:29034485
Abstract

Various forms of performance assessment are applied to public service institutions, such as hospitals, schools, police units, and local authorities. Difficulties arise in the interpretation of the results presented in some established formats because they require a good understanding and appreciation of the uncertainties involved. Usually the results have to be adapted to the perspectives of the users-managers of the assessed units, a consumer, or a central authority (a watchdog) that dispenses awards and sanctions. We present a decision-theoretical approach to these and related problems in which the perspectives are integrated in the analysis and its results are choices from a finite list of options (alternative courses of action).

摘要

各种形式的绩效评估被应用于公共服务机构,如医院、学校、警察单位和地方当局。在解释某些既定格式呈现的结果时会遇到困难,因为这需要对所涉及的不确定性有很好的理解和认识。通常,结果必须适应评估单位的使用者——管理者、消费者或分配奖励和制裁的中央当局的观点。我们提出了一种决策理论方法来解决这些问题和相关问题,其中将视角整合到分析中,其结果是从有限的选项列表中进行选择(替代行动方案)。

相似文献

1
Decision theory for comparing institutions.制度比较的决策理论。
Stat Med. 2018 Feb 10;37(3):457-472. doi: 10.1002/sim.7525. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
2
Organisational theory. Find the on switch.组织理论。找到启动开关。
Health Serv J. 2004 Feb 5;114(5891):30-2.
3
Performance management in British health care: will it deliver?英国医疗保健中的绩效管理:它会带来成效吗?
Health Aff (Millwood). 2002 May-Jun;21(3):103-15. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.21.3.103.
4
Comparing clinical resources and outcomes to understand best practices.比较临床资源和结果以了解最佳实践。
J Healthc Manag. 2002 Sep-Oct;47(5):287-90.
5
Improving competitiveness through performance-measurement systems.通过绩效衡量系统提高竞争力。
Healthc Financ Manage. 2001 Dec;55(12):46-50.
6
Use of the balanced scorecard in health care.平衡计分卡在医疗保健中的应用。
J Health Care Finance. 2003 Summer;29(4):1-16.
7
Performance-based planning for hospitals.基于绩效的医院规划。
Health Care Strateg Manage. 2000 Dec;18(12):14-7, 1.
8
Manufacturing's prescription for improving healthcare quality.制造业提升医疗质量的良方。
Hosp Top. 2005 Winter;83(1):2-8. doi: 10.3200/HTPS.83.1.2-8.
9
Integrating the physician into the organization decision-making process.将医生纳入组织决策过程。
Best Pract Benchmarking Healthc. 1996 Jan-Feb;1(1):10-5.
10
Applying Taguchi methods to health care.将田口方法应用于医疗保健领域。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur Inc Leadersh Health Serv. 2006;19(1):xxvi-xxxv. doi: 10.1108/13660750610643831.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluations of statistical methods for outlier detection when benchmarking in clinical registries: a systematic review.临床注册研究中离群值检测的统计方法评估:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 14;13(7):e069130. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069130.
2
The problem with composite indicators.综合指标的问题。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 Apr;28(4):338-344. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-007798. Epub 2018 Aug 12.