• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

何时认定儿童的法医陈述可信?身体虐待和性虐待案件的比较。

When Is a Child's Forensic Statement Deemed Credible? A Comparison of Physical and Sexual Abuse Cases.

机构信息

1 School of Social Work, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.

2 Department of Education, Rees Centre for Research on Fostering and Education, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Child Maltreat. 2018 May;23(2):196-206. doi: 10.1177/1077559517734059. Epub 2017 Oct 15.

DOI:10.1177/1077559517734059
PMID:29034734
Abstract

A large national sample of 4,775 reports of child physical and sexual abuse made in Israel in 2014 was analyzed in order to examine whether assessments of credibility would vary according to abuse type, physical or sexual, and whether child and event characteristics contributing to the probability that reports of abuse would be determined as credible would be similar or different in child physical abuse (CPA) and child sexual abuse (CSA) cases. Results revealed that CPA reports were less likely to be viewed as credible (41.9%) compared to CSA reports (56.7%). Multigroup path analysis, however, indicated equivalence in predicting factors. In a unified model for both types of abuse, salient predictors of a credible judgment were older age, lack of a cognitive delay, and the alleged abusive event being a onetime less severe act. Over and beyond the effects of these factors, abuse type significantly contributed to the prediction of credibility judgments.

摘要

对 2014 年在以色列进行的 4775 起儿童身体和性虐待报告的大型全国样本进行了分析,目的是检验可信度评估是否会因虐待类型(身体虐待或性虐待)而有所不同,以及导致虐待报告被认定为可信的儿童和事件特征在儿童身体虐待(CPA)和儿童性虐待(CSA)案件中是否相似或不同。结果表明,与 CSA 报告(56.7%)相比,CPA 报告被认为更不可信(41.9%)。然而,多组路径分析表明,预测因素具有等效性。在针对这两种类型的虐待的统一模型中,可信判断的显著预测因素是年龄较大、无认知障碍以及被指控的虐待行为是一次性较轻的行为。除了这些因素的影响外,虐待类型对可信度判断的预测也有显著贡献。

相似文献

1
When Is a Child's Forensic Statement Deemed Credible? A Comparison of Physical and Sexual Abuse Cases.何时认定儿童的法医陈述可信?身体虐待和性虐待案件的比较。
Child Maltreat. 2018 May;23(2):196-206. doi: 10.1177/1077559517734059. Epub 2017 Oct 15.
2
Credibility assessment in child sexual abuse investigations: A descriptive analysis.儿童性虐待调查中的可信度评估:描述性分析。
Child Abuse Negl. 2017 May;67:76-85. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.01.027. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
3
Child sexual abuse - Initial suspicion and legal outcome.儿童性虐待 - 初步怀疑与法律结果。
Forensic Sci Int. 2018 Oct;291:39-43. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.06.032. Epub 2018 Jun 30.
4
Children's disclosures of sexual abuse: learning from direct inquiry.儿童对性虐待的披露:从直接询问中学习。
Child Abuse Negl. 2011 May;35(5):343-52. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2011.01.014.
5
Outcry Consistency and Prosecutorial Decisions in Child Sexual Abuse Cases.儿童性虐待案件中的公众强烈抗议一致性与检察决定
J Child Sex Abus. 2018 May-Jun;27(4):424-438. doi: 10.1080/10538712.2018.1474413. Epub 2018 May 18.
6
Improving credibility assessment in child sexual abuse allegations: the role of the NICHD investigative interview protocol.提高儿童性虐待指控中的可信度评估:国家儿童健康与人类发展研究所调查性访谈协议的作用。
Child Abuse Negl. 2007 Feb;31(2):99-110. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2006.09.005. Epub 2007 Feb 20.
7
Reliability of professional judgments in forensic child sexual abuse evaluations: unsettled or unsettling science?法医儿童性虐待评估中专业判断的可靠性:是尚未定论还是令人不安的科学?
J Child Sex Abus. 2012;21(1):72-90. doi: 10.1080/10538712.2012.642467.
8
Assessing Children's Credibility in Courtroom Investigations of Alleged Child Sexual Abuse: Suggestibility, Plausibility, and Consistency.评估儿童在涉嫌儿童性虐待法庭调查中的可信度:易受暗示性、可信性和一致性。
Child Maltreat. 2020 May;25(2):224-232. doi: 10.1177/1077559519872825. Epub 2019 Sep 8.
9
Children's disclosure of sexual abuse during early forensic psychiatric evaluation in Southern Taiwan.台湾南部儿童在早期法医精神病学评估期间对性虐待的披露。
J Formos Med Assoc. 2016 Dec;115(12):1069-1075. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2016.05.002. Epub 2016 Jul 13.
10
Predicting disclosure latency in substantiated cases of child sexual abuse.预测儿童性虐待被证实案件中的披露潜伏期。
Child Abuse Negl. 2021 Dec;122:105346. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2021.105346. Epub 2021 Oct 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison between Thai and Indian Adolescents' Self-Figure Drawing as Child Abuse Art-Based Assessment.泰国和印度青少年基于儿童虐待艺术评估的自我形象绘画比较。
Children (Basel). 2024 Sep 8;11(9):1101. doi: 10.3390/children11091101.
2
Perceptions of Allegations of Repeated Victimization: The Roles of Event Frequency, Language Specificity, and Disclosure Delay.对重复受害指控的认知:事件频率、语言特异性和披露延迟的作用。
J Interpers Violence. 2023 Mar;38(5-6):4925-4944. doi: 10.1177/08862605221120903. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
3
Credibility Judgment Predictors for Child Sexual Abuse Reports in Forensic Psychiatric Evaluations.
法医精神病学评估中儿童性虐待报告的可信度判断预测因素
Psychiatry Investig. 2019 Feb;16(2):139-144. doi: 10.30773/pi.2018.12.03. Epub 2019 Feb 21.