• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床试验中多重性调整的半参数受益亚组识别

Multiplicity-adjusted semiparametric benefiting subgroup identification in clinical trials.

作者信息

Schnell Patrick M, Müller Peter, Tang Qi, Carlin Bradley P

机构信息

1 Division of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.

2 Department of Mathematics, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.

出版信息

Clin Trials. 2018 Feb;15(1):75-86. doi: 10.1177/1740774517729167. Epub 2017 Oct 16.

DOI:10.1177/1740774517729167
PMID:29035083
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8796253/
Abstract

Background A recent focus in the health sciences has been the development of personalized medicine, which includes determining the population for which a given treatment is effective. Due to limited data, identifying the true benefiting population is a challenging task. To tackle this difficulty, the credible subgroups approach provides a pair of bounding subgroups for the true benefiting subgroup, constructed so that one is contained by the benefiting subgroup while the other contains the benefiting subgroup with high probability. However, the method has so far only been developed for parametric linear models. Methods In this article, we develop the details required to follow the credible subgroups approach in more realistic settings by considering nonlinear and semiparametric regression models, supported for regulatory science by conditional power simulations. We also present an improved multiple testing approach using a step-down procedure. We evaluate our approach via simulations and apply it to data from four trials of Alzheimer's disease treatments carried out by AbbVie. Results Semiparametric modeling yields credible subgroups that are more robust to violations of linear treatment effect assumptions, and careful choice of the population of interest as well as the step-down multiple testing procedure result in a higher rate of detection of benefiting types of patients. The approach allows us to identify types of patients that benefit from treatment in the Alzheimer's disease trials. Conclusion Attempts to identify benefiting subgroups of patients in clinical trials are often met with skepticism due to a lack of multiplicity control and unrealistically restrictive assumptions. Our proposed approach merges two techniques, credible subgroups, and semiparametric regression, which avoids these problems and makes benefiting subgroup identification practical and reliable.

摘要

背景 健康科学领域最近的一个重点是个性化医疗的发展,其中包括确定某种特定治疗方法对哪些人群有效。由于数据有限,确定真正受益的人群是一项具有挑战性的任务。为了解决这一难题,可信亚组方法为真正的受益亚组提供了一对边界亚组,其构建方式是一个亚组包含在受益亚组中,而另一个亚组很可能包含受益亚组。然而,到目前为止,该方法仅针对参数线性模型进行了开发。

方法 在本文中,我们通过考虑非线性和半参数回归模型,在更现实的环境中详细阐述了遵循可信亚组方法所需的内容,并通过条件功效模拟为监管科学提供支持。我们还提出了一种使用逐步递减程序的改进多重检验方法。我们通过模拟评估我们的方法,并将其应用于艾伯维公司进行的四项阿尔茨海默病治疗试验的数据。

结果 半参数建模产生的可信亚组对于违反线性治疗效果假设的情况更具稳健性,并且仔细选择感兴趣的人群以及逐步递减多重检验程序会导致更高的受益患者类型检测率。该方法使我们能够在阿尔茨海默病试验中识别出从治疗中受益的患者类型。

结论 由于缺乏多重性控制和不切实际的严格假设,在临床试验中识别受益患者亚组的尝试往往受到质疑。我们提出的方法融合了两种技术,即可信亚组和半参数回归,避免了这些问题,并使受益亚组的识别切实可行且可靠。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ae7/8796253/8bca89bd4c70/nihms-1771907-f0016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ae7/8796253/4d1c7fe50be0/nihms-1771907-f0011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ae7/8796253/4ad57253ab33/nihms-1771907-f0012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ae7/8796253/4cb055c262f7/nihms-1771907-f0013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ae7/8796253/d9394005739e/nihms-1771907-f0014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ae7/8796253/c8f5bc908807/nihms-1771907-f0015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ae7/8796253/8bca89bd4c70/nihms-1771907-f0016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ae7/8796253/4d1c7fe50be0/nihms-1771907-f0011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ae7/8796253/4ad57253ab33/nihms-1771907-f0012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ae7/8796253/4cb055c262f7/nihms-1771907-f0013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ae7/8796253/d9394005739e/nihms-1771907-f0014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ae7/8796253/c8f5bc908807/nihms-1771907-f0015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ae7/8796253/8bca89bd4c70/nihms-1771907-f0016.jpg

相似文献

1
Multiplicity-adjusted semiparametric benefiting subgroup identification in clinical trials.临床试验中多重性调整的半参数受益亚组识别
Clin Trials. 2018 Feb;15(1):75-86. doi: 10.1177/1740774517729167. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
2
Monte Carlo approaches to frequentist multiplicity-adjusted benefiting subgroup identification.贝叶斯方法与传统频率派方法在获益亚组识别中的比较
Stat Methods Med Res. 2021 Apr;30(4):1026-1041. doi: 10.1177/0962280220973705. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
3
A Bayesian credible subgroups approach to identifying patient subgroups with positive treatment effects.一种用于识别具有积极治疗效果的患者亚组的贝叶斯可信亚组方法。
Biometrics. 2016 Dec;72(4):1026-1036. doi: 10.1111/biom.12522. Epub 2016 May 9.
4
Bayesian credible subgroup identification for treatment effectiveness in time-to-event data.贝叶斯可信亚组识别在生存时间数据中的治疗效果。
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 26;15(2):e0229336. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229336. eCollection 2020.
5
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
6
Subgroup analysis with semiparametric models toward precision medicine.亚组分析与精准医学的半参数模型。
Stat Med. 2018 May 20;37(11):1830-1845. doi: 10.1002/sim.7638. Epub 2018 Mar 25.
7
Subgroup identification for treatment selection in biomarker adaptive design.生物标志物适应性设计中用于治疗选择的亚组识别
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015 Dec 9;15:105. doi: 10.1186/s12874-015-0098-7.
8
Controlling the false-discovery rate when identifying the subgroup benefiting from treatment.控制识别治疗获益亚组时的假发现率。
Clin Trials. 2023 Aug;20(4):394-404. doi: 10.1177/17407745231169300. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
9
A comparison of subgroup identification methods in clinical drug development: Simulation study and regulatory considerations.临床药物开发中亚组识别方法的比较:模拟研究与监管考量
Pharm Stat. 2019 Oct;18(5):600-626. doi: 10.1002/pst.1951. Epub 2019 Jul 3.
10
Subgroup analyses in randomised controlled trials: quantifying the risks of false-positives and false-negatives.随机对照试验中的亚组分析:量化假阳性和假阴性风险
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(33):1-56. doi: 10.3310/hta5330.

引用本文的文献

1
[Subgroup identification based on accelerated failure time model combined with adaptive elastic net].基于加速失效时间模型结合自适应弹性网络的亚组识别
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2021 Mar 25;41(3):391-398. doi: 10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2021.03.11.
2
Bayesian Approaches to Subgroup Analysis and Related Adaptive Clinical Trial Designs.贝叶斯亚组分析方法及相关适应性临床试验设计
JCO Precis Oncol. 2019 Oct 24;3. doi: 10.1200/PO.19.00003. eCollection 2019.
3
Bayesian credible subgroup identification for treatment effectiveness in time-to-event data.

本文引用的文献

1
A Bayesian credible subgroups approach to identifying patient subgroups with positive treatment effects.一种用于识别具有积极治疗效果的患者亚组的贝叶斯可信亚组方法。
Biometrics. 2016 Dec;72(4):1026-1036. doi: 10.1111/biom.12522. Epub 2016 May 9.
2
A Bayesian approach to subgroup identification.一种用于亚组识别的贝叶斯方法。
J Biopharm Stat. 2014;24(1):110-29. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2013.856026.
3
Bayesian Nonparametric Inference - Why and How.贝叶斯非参数推断——为何及如何进行
贝叶斯可信亚组识别在生存时间数据中的治疗效果。
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 26;15(2):e0229336. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229336. eCollection 2020.
4
Bayesian additive regression trees and the General BART model.贝叶斯加法回归树与通用BART模型。
Stat Med. 2019 Nov 10;38(25):5048-5069. doi: 10.1002/sim.8347. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
Bayesian Anal. 2013;8(2). doi: 10.1214/13-BA811.
4
Subgroup identification from randomized clinical trial data.随机临床试验数据中的亚组识别。
Stat Med. 2011 Oct 30;30(24):2867-80. doi: 10.1002/sim.4322. Epub 2011 Aug 4.
5
Simple incorporation of interactions into additive models.将相互作用简单纳入加法模型。
Biometrics. 2001 Jun;57(2):539-45. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341x.2001.00539.x.
6
A new rating scale for Alzheimer's disease.一种用于阿尔茨海默病的新评定量表。
Am J Psychiatry. 1984 Nov;141(11):1356-64. doi: 10.1176/ajp.141.11.1356.