• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

贝叶斯可信亚组识别在生存时间数据中的治疗效果。

Bayesian credible subgroup identification for treatment effectiveness in time-to-event data.

机构信息

Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, United States of America.

Department of Statistics, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, Michigan, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Feb 26;15(2):e0229336. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229336. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0229336
PMID:32101562
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7043747/
Abstract

Due to differential treatment responses of patients to pharmacotherapy, drug development and practice in medicine are concerned with personalized medicine, which includes identifying subgroups of population that exhibit differential treatment effect. For time-to-event data, available methods only focus on detecting and testing treatment-by-covariate interactions and may not consider multiplicity. In this work, we introduce the Bayesian credible subgroups approach for time-to-event endpoints. It provides two bounding subgroups for the true benefiting subgroup: one which is likely to be contained by the benefiting subgroup and one which is likely to contain the benefiting subgroup. A personalized treatment effect is estimated by two common measures of survival time: the hazard ratio and restricted mean survival time. We apply the method to identify benefiting subgroups in a case study of prostate carcinoma patients and a simulated large clinical dataset.

摘要

由于患者对药物治疗的反应存在差异,药物开发和医学实践都关注个性化医学,包括识别表现出不同治疗效果的人群亚组。对于生存时间数据,现有的方法仅侧重于检测和检验治疗与协变量的相互作用,而可能不考虑多重性。在这项工作中,我们引入了用于生存时间终点的贝叶斯可信亚组方法。它为真正受益的亚组提供了两个边界亚组:一个可能包含受益亚组,另一个可能包含受益亚组。通过两种常见的生存时间衡量标准:风险比和受限平均生存时间,估计个性化治疗效果。我们将该方法应用于前列腺癌患者的病例研究和模拟的大型临床数据集,以确定受益亚组。

相似文献

1
Bayesian credible subgroup identification for treatment effectiveness in time-to-event data.贝叶斯可信亚组识别在生存时间数据中的治疗效果。
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 26;15(2):e0229336. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229336. eCollection 2020.
2
Multiplicity-adjusted semiparametric benefiting subgroup identification in clinical trials.临床试验中多重性调整的半参数受益亚组识别
Clin Trials. 2018 Feb;15(1):75-86. doi: 10.1177/1740774517729167. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
3
A Bayesian credible subgroups approach to identifying patient subgroups with positive treatment effects.一种用于识别具有积极治疗效果的患者亚组的贝叶斯可信亚组方法。
Biometrics. 2016 Dec;72(4):1026-1036. doi: 10.1111/biom.12522. Epub 2016 May 9.
4
Monte Carlo approaches to frequentist multiplicity-adjusted benefiting subgroup identification.贝叶斯方法与传统频率派方法在获益亚组识别中的比较
Stat Methods Med Res. 2021 Apr;30(4):1026-1041. doi: 10.1177/0962280220973705. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
5
Using the Bayesian credible subgroups method to identify populations benefiting from treatment: An application to the Look AHEAD trial.应用贝叶斯可信亚组分析方法识别治疗获益人群:以 LOOK AHEAD 试验为例。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 21;15(4):e0231241. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231241. eCollection 2020.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
Subgroup analyses in randomised controlled trials: quantifying the risks of false-positives and false-negatives.随机对照试验中的亚组分析:量化假阳性和假阴性风险
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(33):1-56. doi: 10.3310/hta5330.
8
Semi-parametric Bayesian regression for subgroup analysis in clinical trials.用于临床试验亚组分析的半参数贝叶斯回归
J Biopharm Stat. 2019;29(6):1024-1042. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2019.1572613. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
9
Regularized outcome weighted subgroup identification for differential treatment effects.用于差异治疗效果的正则化结果加权亚组识别
Biometrics. 2015 Sep;71(3):645-53. doi: 10.1111/biom.12322. Epub 2015 May 11.
10
A comparison of subgroup identification methods in clinical drug development: Simulation study and regulatory considerations.临床药物开发中亚组识别方法的比较:模拟研究与监管考量
Pharm Stat. 2019 Oct;18(5):600-626. doi: 10.1002/pst.1951. Epub 2019 Jul 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Selecting predictive biomarkers from genomic data.从基因组数据中选择预测生物标志物。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 16;17(6):e0269369. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269369. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Stan: A Probabilistic Programming Language.斯坦:一种概率编程语言。
J Stat Softw. 2017;76. doi: 10.18637/jss.v076.i01. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
2
Methods for exploring and eliciting patient preferences in the medical product lifecycle: a literature review.探索和引出医疗产品生命周期中患者偏好的方法:文献综述。
Drug Discov Today. 2019 Jul;24(7):1324-1331. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2019.05.001. Epub 2019 May 8.
3
Subgroup identification in clinical trials via the predicted individual treatment effect.通过预测的个体治疗效果进行临床试验中的亚组识别。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 18;13(10):e0205971. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205971. eCollection 2018.
4
Individualized treatment effects with censored data via fully nonparametric Bayesian accelerated failure time models.基于完全非参数贝叶斯加速失效时间模型的删失数据个体化治疗效果。
Biostatistics. 2020 Jan 1;21(1):50-68. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxy028.
5
Multiplicity-adjusted semiparametric benefiting subgroup identification in clinical trials.临床试验中多重性调整的半参数受益亚组识别
Clin Trials. 2018 Feb;15(1):75-86. doi: 10.1177/1740774517729167. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
6
Exploratory subgroup analysis in clinical trials by model selection.通过模型选择进行临床试验中的探索性亚组分析。
Biom J. 2016 Sep;58(5):1217-28. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201500147. Epub 2016 May 27.
7
A Bayesian credible subgroups approach to identifying patient subgroups with positive treatment effects.一种用于识别具有积极治疗效果的患者亚组的贝叶斯可信亚组方法。
Biometrics. 2016 Dec;72(4):1026-1036. doi: 10.1111/biom.12522. Epub 2016 May 9.
8
Recommendations for benefit-risk assessment methodologies and visual representations.效益-风险评估方法及可视化表示的建议。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2016 Mar;25(3):251-62. doi: 10.1002/pds.3958. Epub 2016 Jan 22.
9
On the restricted mean survival time curve in survival analysis.生存分析中受限平均生存时间曲线的研究
Biometrics. 2016 Mar;72(1):215-21. doi: 10.1111/biom.12384. Epub 2015 Aug 24.
10
Alternatives to Hazard Ratios for Comparing the Efficacy or Safety of Therapies in Noninferiority Studies.非劣效性研究中用于比较治疗效果或安全性的风险比替代方法。
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Jul 21;163(2):127-34. doi: 10.7326/M14-1741.