• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

数据如何推动儿童福利政策与实践?在加拿大建立联系。

How Can Data Drive Policy and Practice in Child Welfare? Making the Link in Canada.

作者信息

Fallon Barbara, Filippelli Joanne, Black Tara, Trocmé Nico, Esposito Tonino

机构信息

Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, 246 Bloor Street West, Toronto, ON M5S 1V4, Canada.

Centre for Research on Children and Families, McGill University, 3506 University Street, Montreal, QC H3A 2A7, Canada.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Oct 14;14(10):1223. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14101223.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph14101223
PMID:29036894
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5664724/
Abstract

Formal university-child welfare partnerships offer a unique opportunity to begin to fill the gaps in the child welfare knowledge base and link child welfare services to the realities of practice. With resources from a knowledge mobilization grant, a formal partnership was developed between the University of Toronto, clinicians, policy analysts, and researchers from child welfare agencies across Ontario. The key objectives of the grant included: (1) enhancing the capacity of service providers to access and analyze child welfare data to inform service and policy decisions; (2) integrating clinical expertise in service and policy decisions; and (3) developing a joint research agenda addressing high-priority knowledge gaps. This partnership was an opportunity to advance the evidence base with respect to service provision in Ontario and to create a culture of knowledge and evidence that would eventually support more complex research initiatives. Administrative data was analyzed for this partnership through the Ontario Child Abuse and Neglect Data System (OCANDS)-the first child welfare data system in Ontario to track child welfare-involved children and their families. Child welfare agencies identified recurrence as an important priority and agency-driven analyses were subsequently conducted on OCANDS generated recurrence Service Performance Indicators (SPI's). Using an urgent versus chronic investigative taxonomy for analyses, findings revealed that the majority of cases did not recur within 12 months and cases identified as chronic needs are more likely to return to the attention of child welfare authorities. One of the key outcomes of the partnership - helping agencies to understand their administrative data is described, as are considerations for next steps for future partnerships and research.

摘要

正式的大学与儿童福利机构合作关系提供了一个独特的契机,可着手填补儿童福利知识库中的空白,并将儿童福利服务与实际情况相联系。借助知识动员拨款提供的资源,多伦多大学、临床医生、政策分析师以及安大略省各地儿童福利机构的研究人员之间建立了正式的合作关系。该拨款的主要目标包括:(1)提高服务提供者获取和分析儿童福利数据以指导服务和政策决策的能力;(2)将临床专业知识融入服务和政策决策;(3)制定一个联合研究议程,以解决高度优先的知识空白。这种合作关系是一个推进安大略省服务提供方面证据基础的契机,并营造一种知识和证据文化,最终支持更复杂的研究计划。通过安大略省虐待和忽视儿童数据系统(OCANDS)对该合作关系的行政数据进行了分析,OCANDS是安大略省首个追踪涉及儿童福利的儿童及其家庭的儿童福利数据系统。儿童福利机构将复发确定为一个重要优先事项,随后对OCANDS生成的复发服务绩效指标(SPI)进行了机构驱动的分析。使用紧急与慢性调查分类法进行分析,结果显示大多数案件在12个月内没有复发,被确定为慢性需求的案件更有可能再次引起儿童福利当局的关注。描述了该合作关系的一个关键成果——帮助各机构了解其行政数据,以及对未来合作关系和研究后续步骤的考虑。

相似文献

1
How Can Data Drive Policy and Practice in Child Welfare? Making the Link in Canada.数据如何推动儿童福利政策与实践?在加拿大建立联系。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Oct 14;14(10):1223. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14101223.
2
Screening for economic hardship for child welfare-involved families during the COVID-19 pandemic: A rapid partnership response.在 COVID-19 大流行期间对儿童福利相关家庭进行经济困难筛查:快速的合作伙伴关系应对。
Child Abuse Negl. 2020 Dec;110(Pt 2):104706. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2020.104706. Epub 2020 Sep 4.
3
Consumers' and health providers' views and perceptions of partnering to improve health services design, delivery and evaluation: a co-produced qualitative evidence synthesis.消费者和卫生服务提供者对合作改善卫生服务设计、提供和评估的看法和认知:一项共同制定的定性证据综合研究。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 14;3(3):CD013274. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013274.pub2.
4
Examining Child Welfare Decisions and Services for Asian-Canadian Versus White-Canadian Children and Families in the Child Welfare System.审视儿童福利系统中针对亚裔加拿大儿童与白人加拿大儿童及家庭的儿童福利决策和服务。
Child Maltreat. 2017 May;22(2):132-144. doi: 10.1177/1077559517690829. Epub 2017 Jan 1.
5
Factors associated with racial differences in child welfare investigative decision-making in Ontario, Canada.与加拿大安大略省儿童福利调查决策中的种族差异相关的因素。
Child Abuse Negl. 2017 Nov;73:89-105. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.09.027. Epub 2017 Sep 23.
6
The absence of language: A critical race discourse analysis of Ontario's child welfare legislation and the impacts on Black families.无声的语言:安大略省儿童福利立法的批判种族话语分析及其对黑人家庭的影响。
Child Abuse Negl. 2023 Sep;143:106249. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2023.106249. Epub 2023 Jun 7.
7
Educational neglect: Understanding 20 years of child welfare trends.教育忽视:理解 20 年的儿童福利趋势。
Child Abuse Negl. 2018 Jan;75:50-60. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.04.034. Epub 2017 May 18.
8
The overrepresentation of First Nations children and families involved with child welfare: Findings from the Ontario incidence study of reported child abuse and neglect 2013.《安大略省 2013 年报告虐待和忽视儿童事件发生率研究:与儿童福利有关的第一民族儿童和家庭的过度代表性》。
Child Abuse Negl. 2019 Apr;90:52-65. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.01.022. Epub 2019 Feb 8.
9
A changing child welfare workforce: What worker characteristics are valued in child welfare?不断变化的儿童福利工作队伍:儿童福利工作者的哪些特征受到重视?
Child Abuse Negl. 2018 Jul;81:170-180. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.04.029. Epub 2018 May 7.
10
Utilization of the Canadian Incidence Study of Reported Child Abuse and Neglect by child welfare agencies in Ontario.安大略省儿童福利机构对《加拿大儿童虐待和忽视报告发生率研究》的利用情况。
Chronic Dis Inj Can. 2012 Dec;33(1):29-37.

引用本文的文献

1
Why Are Child and Youth Welfare Support Services Initiated? A First-Time Analysis of Administrative Data on Child and Youth Welfare Services in Austria.为何启动儿童和青少年福利支持服务?对奥地利儿童和青少年福利服务行政数据的首次分析。
Children (Basel). 2023 Aug 11;10(8):1376. doi: 10.3390/children10081376.
2
Data resource: Children receiving care and support and children in need, administrative records in Wales.数据资源:威尔士接受照料和支持的儿童及有需要的儿童,行政记录。
Int J Popul Data Sci. 2022 May 9;7(1):1694. doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v7i1.1694. eCollection 2022.
3
What makes administrative data "research-ready"? A systematic review and thematic analysis of published literature.使行政数据“研究就绪”的因素是什么?已发表文献的系统回顾和主题分析。
Int J Popul Data Sci. 2022 Apr 27;7(1):1718. doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v6i1.1718. eCollection 2022.
4
Trends in investigations of abuse or neglect referred by hospital personnel in Ontario.安大略省医院工作人员转介的虐待或忽视调查趋势。
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2019 Feb 4;3(1):e000386. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2018-000386. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
Infants and the decision to provide ongoing child welfare services.婴儿与提供持续儿童福利服务的决策。
Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2017 May 1;11:24. doi: 10.1186/s13034-017-0162-7. eCollection 2017.
2
Race and child maltreatment reporting: Are Blacks overrepresented?种族与儿童虐待报告:黑人的比例是否过高?
Child Youth Serv Rev. 2009 Mar;31(3):309-316. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2008.08.004. Epub 2008 Aug 7.
3
Building an Evidence-Driven Child Welfare Workforce: A University-Agency Partnership.打造以证据为导向的儿童福利工作队伍:大学与机构的伙伴关系。
J Soc Work Educ. 2015;51(Suppl 2):S283-S298. Epub 2015 Oct 13.
4
Building research capacity in child welfare in Canada.提升加拿大儿童福利领域的研究能力。
Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2016 Jun 14;10:16. doi: 10.1186/s13034-016-0103-x. eCollection 2016.
5
Community-Academic Partnerships: A Systematic Review of the State of the Literature and Recommendations for Future Research.社区-学术伙伴关系:文献现状的系统综述及对未来研究的建议
Milbank Q. 2016 Mar;94(1):163-214. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12184.
6
Risk of re-reporting among infants who remain at home following alleged maltreatment.在被指控遭受虐待后仍留在家中的婴儿中再次报告的风险。
Child Maltreat. 2015 May;20(2):92-103. doi: 10.1177/1077559514558586. Epub 2014 Nov 21.
7
Risk factors for child maltreatment recurrence: An updated systematic review.儿童虐待复发的风险因素:一项最新的系统综述。
Med Sci Law. 2015 Oct;55(4):259-77. doi: 10.1177/0025802414543855. Epub 2014 Aug 8.
8
A developmental approach to the risk of a first recurrence in child protective services.一种针对儿童保护服务中首次复发风险的发展性方法。
Child Abuse Negl. 2013 Dec;37(12):1132-41. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2013.05.001. Epub 2013 Jun 12.
9
Opportunities for prevention and intervention with young children: lessons from the Canadian incidence study of reported child abuse and neglect.儿童虐待和忽视报告的加拿大发生率研究:对幼儿进行预防和干预的机会。
Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2013 Feb 13;7(1):4. doi: 10.1186/1753-2000-7-4.
10
Understanding the investigation-stage overrepresentation of First Nations children in the child welfare system: an analysis of the First Nations component of the Canadian Incidence Study of Reported Child Abuse and Neglect 2008.了解儿童福利系统中第一民族儿童在调查阶段的过度代表情况:对2008年加拿大报告的儿童虐待和忽视事件发生率研究中第一民族部分的分析。
Child Abuse Negl. 2013 Oct;37(10):821-31. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2012.11.010. Epub 2013 Jan 17.