Department of Internal Medicine, Chi Mei Medical Center, Liouying, Tainan, Taiwan.
Department of Medical Research, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan; Department of Food Science, National Chiayi University, Chiayi, Taiwan.
J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2018 Apr;51(2):207-213. doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2017.08.026. Epub 2017 Oct 6.
This study aims to assess the in vitro activity of cefoperazone alone and different cefoperazone-sulbactam ratios against different inoculum sizes of multidrug resistant organisms.
Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of cefoperazone, cefoperazone-sulbactam at fixed ratio of 1:1 and 2:1 against a normal inoculum size of 5 × 10 CFU/ml and a high inoculum size of 5 × 10 CFU/ml were measured.
Each 33 isolates of extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli, ESBL-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae, carbapenem-resistant E. coli, and carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and a total of 122 isolates of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii were collected. After the addition of sulbactam at a 1:1 ratio, most MIC and MIC values decreased. Cefoperazone-sulbactam at a 1:1 ratio had a higher susceptibility rate against ESBL-producing E. coli, carbapenem-resistant E. coli, and carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii than cefoperazone-sulbactam at a 2:1 ratio (all P < 0.05). For ESBL-producing E. coli, the susceptibility rate of cefoperazone-sulbactam at ratios of (1:1) and (2:1) decreased from 97.0 to 87.9% and 90.9 to 60.6%, for normal to high inoculum, respectively. For ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae, both susceptibility rate of cefoperazone-sulbactam at ratios of (1:1) and (2:1) decreased from 75.8%, and 63.6% at normal inoculum to 51.5% and 42.4% at high inoculum.
Cefoperazone-sulbactam at a 1:1 ratio has greater in vitro activity against most multidrug resistant organisms than cefoperazone-sulbactam at a 2:1 ratio. Such combinations were not influenced by the inoculum size of ESBL-producing E. coli and K. pneumoniae and could be a therapeutic option for treating severe infections.
本研究旨在评估头孢哌酮单独使用以及头孢哌酮-舒巴坦不同配比在不同接种量的多药耐药菌中的体外活性。
测定头孢哌酮、头孢哌酮-舒巴坦(固定配比为 1:1 和 2:1)对 5×10 CFU/ml 标准接种量和 5×10 CFU/ml 高接种量的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)。
共收集了 33 株产超广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBL)的大肠埃希菌、产 ESBL 的肺炎克雷伯菌、碳青霉烯类耐药大肠埃希菌和碳青霉烯类耐药铜绿假单胞菌,以及 122 株碳青霉烯类耐药鲍曼不动杆菌。加入舒巴坦 1:1 比例后,大多数 MIC 和 MIC 值降低。头孢哌酮-舒巴坦(1:1 比例)对产 ESBL 的大肠埃希菌、碳青霉烯类耐药大肠埃希菌和碳青霉烯类耐药鲍曼不动杆菌的敏感性率高于头孢哌酮-舒巴坦(2:1 比例)(均 P<0.05)。对于产 ESBL 的大肠埃希菌,头孢哌酮-舒巴坦(1:1 和 2:1 比例)的敏感性率从标准接种量的 97.0%和 90.9%分别降至高接种量的 87.9%和 60.6%。对于产 ESBL 的肺炎克雷伯菌,头孢哌酮-舒巴坦(1:1 和 2:1 比例)的敏感性率从标准接种量的 75.8%和 63.6%分别降至高接种量的 51.5%和 42.4%。
头孢哌酮-舒巴坦(1:1 比例)对大多数多药耐药菌的体外活性大于头孢哌酮-舒巴坦(2:1 比例)。此类组合不受产 ESBL 的大肠埃希菌和肺炎克雷伯菌接种量的影响,可能是治疗严重感染的一种治疗选择。