In Vitro Activity of Cefaclor/Beta-Lactamases Inhibitors (Clavulanic Acid and Sulbactam) Combination Against Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase Producing Uropathogenic .

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) caused by the multidrug resistance (MDR) phenotype termed extended-spectrum beta lactamase (ESBL)-producing is a significant and growing global health concern. In response to the rising prevalence, the novel Beta Lactam-Beta Lactamase inhibitor (BL/BLI) combinations have been introduced in recent years. While these agents have shown efficacy, their clinical utility is constrained by high cost, limited availability, and emerging resistance mechanisms. The rational of this study was to test the in vitro activity of a cost-effective alternative to currently available BL-BLI combinations against ESBL-producing isolated from urinary tract infections (UTIs). This study investigates the in vitro antimicrobial activity of cefaclor (CFC), both as monotherapy and in combination with the β-lactamase inhibitors clavulanic acid (CA) and sulbactam (SUL), against 52 ESBL-producing isolates derived from urine cultures of patients diagnosed with UTIs. The susceptibility ranges were measured by disk diffusion and minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) methods. In addition, the Time kill assay and disk approximation method were performed to measure the synergistic and bactericidal activity of the approached combination. The MIC50 and MIC90 for CFC were improved from more than 128 µg/mL to 8/4 µg/mL when CFC was combined with either CA or SUL. The triple combination format of CFC/CA/SUL showed MIC50 and MIC90 values at 8/4/4 µg/mL and 64/32/32 µg/mL, respectively. The recovered susceptibility percentages were 54%, 54%, and 58% for CFC/CA, CFC/SUL, and CFC/CA/SUL combinations, respectively. Disk approximation and time-kill assay results revealed synergy and bactericidal effects when CFC combined with CA or SUL for isolates that showed susceptibility restorations of CFC when coupled with CA or SUL by the disk diffusion and MIC method. This study proposes a cost-effective combination that could mitigate resistance development and offer a sparing option to last resort treatment choices including carbapenems. However, testing efficacy in a clinical setting is crucial.