Shah Shristi, Knoble Stephen, Ross Oliver, Pickering Stephen
National Academy of Medical Sciences and Nick Simons Institute, GPO - 8975, EPC - 1873, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Nick Simons Institute, Patan, Nepal.
World J Surg. 2017 Dec;41(12):3006-3011. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4273-3.
Across Nepal, anesthesia at a district level is provided mostly by non-doctor anesthesia providers (anesthesia assistants-AAs). Nepal's Government recognized the need to sustain competence with continuous professional development and to upgrade 6-month trained working AAs to professional equivalence with the new national standard of 12-month training. As they are essential district health workers and AA clinical training sites are full, an innovative distance blended learning, competency-based, upgrade 1-year course was developed and conducted in 2014-2017 for two batches.
The course content was developed over 18 months by a team of Nepali and overseas AA training experts. The 1-year course started with a refresher course, continued with tablet-based 12-month self-learning modules and clinical case logs, regular educational mentor communication, midcourse 2-week contact time in an AA training site, regular text messaging and ended with clinical examination and multiple-choice questions. Tablet content included 168 new case studies, pre- and posttests, video lectures, matching exercises and a resource library. All module work and logged clinical cases were uploaded centrally, where clinical mentors were able to review work. Clinical skills were upgraded, as needed, through direct clinical contact midway through the course. Quantitative and qualitative course assessments were included.
Fourteen working AAs in first batch and eight working AAs in second batch from district, zonal and mission hospitals across Nepal were enrolled. All remained working at their hospitals throughout the course, and there were no significant tablet problems inhibiting course completion. Twenty-one AAs completed all modules successfully with time required for module completion averaging 19.2 h (range 11.2-32). One AA left the course after 3 months with a personal problem. Subjectively, AAs felt that the obstetric and pediatric modules were more difficult; lowest marks were objectively seen in the airway module. Clinical mentors averaged 8.2 h mentoring review work per module with direct student communication of 2.9 h per module per month. Participants logged a total of 5473 clinical cases, ranging between 50 and 788 cases each. Complications were recorded; outcomes were good. Challenges were the national IT infrastructure making data synchronization difficult and the lack of clinical exposure at some AA's hospitals. Nineteen AAs attended the final examination, and all passed. Two AAs withdrew before the final examination period due to personal and logistic reasons.
This is the first use of distance blended learning to upgrade district health workers in Nepal and perhaps for non-doctor anesthesia providers globally. Key success factors were motivated students, cultural and contextualized clinical content, good educational mentoring relationships with regular communication, central IT and motivational support, and face-to-face midcourse clinical contact time.
在尼泊尔全国,地区级别的麻醉工作大多由非医生麻醉提供者(麻醉助理——AAs)承担。尼泊尔政府认识到需要通过持续专业发展来维持能力,并将经过6个月培训的在职麻醉助理提升至与新的12个月培训的国家标准相当的专业水平。由于他们是地区卫生工作的重要人员,且麻醉助理临床培训地点已满员,于是在2014 - 2017年为两批人员开发并开展了一项创新的远程混合学习、基于能力的1年制升级课程。
课程内容由一组尼泊尔和海外麻醉助理培训专家历时18个月制定。这一为期1年的课程以复习课程开始,接着是基于平板电脑的12个月自学模块和临床病例记录、定期的教育导师沟通、在麻醉助理培训地点进行的为期2周的中期集中学习、定期短信交流,最后是临床考试和多项选择题。平板电脑内容包括168个新的案例研究、课前和课后测试、视频讲座、配对练习以及一个资源库。所有模块作业和记录的临床病例都集中上传,临床导师能够对作业进行审核。必要时,通过课程中期的直接临床接触来提升临床技能。课程评估包括定量和定性评估。
来自尼泊尔各地地区、区域和教会医院的第一批14名在职麻醉助理和第二批8名在职麻醉助理参加了课程。在整个课程期间,他们都留在各自医院工作,且没有因平板电脑问题严重阻碍课程完成。21名麻醉助理成功完成了所有模块,模块完成所需的平均时间为19.2小时(范围为11.2 - 32小时)。一名麻醉助理因个人问题在3个月后退出课程。主观上,麻醉助理们认为产科和儿科模块更难;客观上,气道模块得分最低。临床导师每个模块平均花费8.2小时进行辅导审核工作,每月与学生的直接沟通时间为每个模块2.9小时。参与者总共记录了5473个临床病例,每人记录的病例数在50至788例之间。记录了并发症情况;结果良好。面临的挑战包括国家信息技术基础设施导致数据同步困难,以及一些麻醉助理所在医院缺乏临床接触机会。19名麻醉助理参加了期末考试,全部通过。两名麻醉助理在期末考试前因个人和后勤原因退出。
这是尼泊尔首次使用远程混合学习来提升地区卫生工作者,可能也是全球首次用于非医生麻醉提供者。关键的成功因素包括积极主动的学生、符合文化背景的临床内容、通过定期沟通建立的良好教育辅导关系、中央信息技术和激励支持,以及课程中期的面对面临床接触时间。