Optum, Eden Prairie, MN, USA.
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Tarrytown, NY, USA.
Adv Ther. 2017 Nov;34(11):2422-2435. doi: 10.1007/s12325-017-0617-5. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
After a patient with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) fails tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) treatment, clinical guidelines support either cycling to another TNFi or switching to a different mechanism of action (MOA), but payers often require TNFi cycling before they reimburse switching MOA. This study examined treatment persistence, cost, and cost per persistent patient among MOA switchers versus TNFi cyclers.
This study of Commercial and Medicare Advantage claims data from the Optum Research Database included patients with RA and at least one claim for a TNFi (adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, golimumab, or infliximab) between January 2012 and September 2015 who changed to another TNFi or a different MOA therapy (abatacept, tocilizumab, or tofacitinib) within 1 year. The index date was the date of the change in therapy. Treatment persistence was defined as no subsequent switch or 60-day gap in therapy for 1 year post-index. RA-related costs included plan-paid and patient-paid amounts for inpatient, outpatient, and pharmacy claims. Medication costs included index and post-index costs of TNFi and different MOA therapies.
There were 581 (38.3%) MOA switchers and 935 (61.7%) TNFi cyclers. The treatment persistence rate was significantly higher for MOA switchers versus TNFi cyclers (47.7% versus 40.2%, P = 0.004). Mean 1-year healthcare costs were significantly lower among MOA switchers versus TNFi cyclers for total RA-related costs ($37,804 versus $42,116; P < 0.001) and medication costs ($29,001 versus $34,917; P < 0.001). When costs were divided by treatment persistence, costs per persistent patient were lower among MOA switchers versus TNFi cyclers: $25,436 lower total RA-related cost and $25,999 lower medication costs.
MOA switching is associated with higher treatment persistence and lower healthcare costs than TNFi cycling. Reimbursement policies that require patients to cycle TNFi before switching MOA may result in suboptimal outcomes for both patients and payers.
Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals.
在类风湿关节炎(RA)患者使用肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂(TNFi)治疗失败后,临床指南支持循环使用另一种 TNFi 或切换到另一种作用机制(MOA),但支付方通常要求在报销切换 MOA 之前先进行 TNFi 循环。本研究旨在比较 MOA 切换者和 TNFi 循环者在治疗持续性、成本和每位持续性患者的成本方面的差异。
本研究利用 Optum Research Database 中的商业和医疗保险优势数据,纳入了 2012 年 1 月至 2015 年 9 月期间至少有一次 TNFi(阿达木单抗、certolizumab pegol、依那西普、戈利木单抗或英夫利昔单抗)用药索赔,并在 1 年内改用另一种 TNFi 或不同 MOA 治疗(阿巴西普、托珠单抗或托法替布)的 RA 患者。索引日期为治疗改变的日期。治疗持续性定义为在索引日期后 1 年内没有再次转换或治疗中断 60 天。RA 相关成本包括计划支付和患者支付的住院、门诊和药房索赔金额。药物成本包括索引和索引后 TNFi 和不同 MOA 治疗的成本。
共有 581 名(38.3%)MOA 切换者和 935 名(61.7%)TNFi 循环者。与 TNFi 循环者相比,MOA 切换者的治疗持续性显著更高(47.7%比 40.2%,P=0.004)。MOA 切换者的 1 年总 RA 相关成本($37804 比 $42116;P<0.001)和药物成本($29001 比 $34917;P<0.001)显著低于 TNFi 循环者。当将成本按治疗持续性进行划分时,MOA 切换者的每位持续性患者成本也低于 TNFi 循环者:总 RA 相关成本低$25436,药物成本低$25999。
与 TNFi 循环相比,MOA 切换与更高的治疗持续性和更低的医疗保健成本相关。要求患者在切换 MOA 之前循环使用 TNFi 的报销政策可能会导致患者和支付方的结果都不理想。
赛诺菲和再生元制药。