Burmester Gerd R, Lin Yong, Patel Rahul, van Adelsberg Janet, Mangan Erin K, Graham Neil M H, van Hoogstraten Hubert, Bauer Deborah, Ignacio Vargas Juan, Lee Eun Bong
Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Free University and Humboldt University Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Sanofi Genzyme, Bridgewater, New Jersey, USA.
Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 May;76(5):840-847. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210310. Epub 2016 Nov 17.
To compare efficacy and safety of sarilumab monotherapy with adalimumab monotherapy in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who should not continue treatment with methotrexate (MTX) due to intolerance or inadequate response.
MONARCH was a randomised, active-controlled, double-blind, double-dummy, phase III superiority trial. Patients received sarilumab (200 mg every 2 weeks (q2w)) or adalimumab (40 mg q2w) monotherapy for 24 weeks. The primary end point was change from baseline in 28-joint disease activity score using erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) at week 24.
Sarilumab was superior to adalimumab in the primary end point of change from baseline in DAS28-ESR (-3.28 vs -2.20; p<0.0001). Sarilumab-treated patients achieved significantly higher American College of Rheumatology 20/50/70 response rates (sarilumab: 71.7%/45.7%/23.4%; adalimumab: 58.4%/29.7%/11.9%; all p≤0.0074) and had significantly greater improvement in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (p=0.0037). Importantly, at week 24, more patients receiving sarilumab compared with adalimumab achieved Clinical Disease Activity Index remission (7.1% vs 2.7%; nominal p=0.0468) and low disease activity (41.8% vs 24.9%; nominal p=0.0005, supplemental analysis). Adverse events occurred in 63.6% (adalimumab) and 64.1% (sarilumab) of patients, the most common being neutropenia and injection site reactions (sarilumab) and headache and worsening RA (adalimumab). Incidences of infections (sarilumab: 28.8%; adalimumab: 27.7%) and serious infections (1.1%, both groups) were similar, despite neutropenia differences.
Sarilumab monotherapy demonstrated superiority to adalimumab monotherapy by improving the signs and symptoms and physical functions in patients with RA who were unable to continue MTX treatment. The safety profiles of both therapies were consistent with anticipated class effects.
NCT02332590.
比较托珠单抗单药治疗与阿达木单抗单药治疗对因不耐受或反应不佳而不应继续使用甲氨蝶呤(MTX)治疗的活动性类风湿关节炎(RA)患者的疗效和安全性。
MONARCH是一项随机、活性对照、双盲、双模拟、III期优效性试验。患者接受托珠单抗(每2周200mg)或阿达木单抗(每2周40mg)单药治疗24周。主要终点是第24周时使用红细胞沉降率的28个关节疾病活动评分(DAS28-ESR)较基线的变化。
在DAS28-ESR较基线变化的主要终点方面,托珠单抗优于阿达木单抗(-3.28对-2.20;p<0.0001)。接受托珠单抗治疗的患者达到美国风湿病学会20/50/70反应率显著更高(托珠单抗:71.7%/45.7%/23.4%;阿达木单抗:58.4%/29.7%/11.9%;所有p≤0.0074),并且健康评估问卷残疾指数改善显著更大(p=0.0037)。重要的是,在第24周时,与阿达木单抗相比,接受托珠单抗治疗的更多患者达到临床疾病活动指数缓解(7.1%对2.7%;名义p=0.0468)和低疾病活动度(41.8%对24.9%;名义p=0.0005,补充分析)。63.6%(阿达木单抗)和64.1%(托珠单抗)的患者发生不良事件,最常见的是中性粒细胞减少和注射部位反应(托珠单抗)以及头痛和类风湿关节炎加重(阿达木单抗)。尽管中性粒细胞减少存在差异,但感染发生率(托珠单抗:28.8%;阿达木单抗:27.7%)和严重感染发生率(两组均为1.1%)相似。
托珠单抗单药治疗在改善无法继续使用MTX治疗的类风湿关节炎患者的体征、症状和身体功能方面显示出优于阿达木单抗单药治疗。两种疗法的安全性概况与预期的类别效应一致。
NCT02332590。