Suppr超能文献

锁骨下臂丛神经连续阻滞与单次神经阻滞用于桡骨远端手术的前瞻性随机对照试验

Continuous Infraclavicular Brachial Block Versus Single-Shot Nerve Block for Distal Radius Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Control Trial.

作者信息

Ganta Abhishek, Ding David, Fisher Nina, Lavery Jessica, Jain Sudheer, Tejwani Nirmal C

机构信息

Division of Orthopaedic Trauma, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, NY.

出版信息

J Orthop Trauma. 2018 Jan;32(1):22-26. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001021.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy of an infraclavicular single-shot nerve block to a continuous infusion through an OnQ infusion pump for rebound pain (between 12 and 24 hours postoperatively) and postoperative narcotic analgesia requirements in distal radius fractures.

DESIGN

Prospective randomized control trial.

SETTINGS

Performed at 2 hospitals affiliated with a large urban academic medical center.

PATIENTS

Fifty patients undergoing operative fixation of distal radius fractures (OTA/AO type 23B/C).

INTERVENTION

Patients were randomized to receive either an infraclavicular block as a single shot (SSB group) or a continuous infusion through an OnQ pump (OnQ group).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Visual analog scale (0-10) pain levels and amount of pain medication taken.

RESULTS

At all time points after discharge, mean postoperative pain scores were lower in the OnQ group versus the SSB group but did not reach statistical significance. At 12 hours postoperatively, the SSB group and OnQ group pain scores, respectively, were 5.2 and 4.1 (P = 0.1615). At 24 hours, the pain scores for the SSB and OnQ group, respectively, were 5.4 and 4.8 (P = 0.1918). At these same time points, the Percocet taken were the same at 1.3 and 2.3 (P = 0.8328 and 0.8617). Overall 5 of 24 patients in the OnQ group had pump malfunctions with 4 being removed before 48 hours.

CONCLUSION

OnQ pump is not associated with statistically improved postoperative pain control compared with a single nerve block for distal radius fractures and did not address rebound pain.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

摘要

目的

比较锁骨下单次神经阻滞与通过OnQ输注泵持续输注对桡骨远端骨折术后反跳痛(术后12至24小时)及术后麻醉性镇痛药需求的疗效。

设计

前瞻性随机对照试验。

地点

在一家大型城市学术医疗中心的两家附属医院进行。

患者

50例接受桡骨远端骨折手术固定(OTA/AO 23B/C型)的患者。

干预措施

患者被随机分为接受单次锁骨下阻滞(SSB组)或通过OnQ泵持续输注(OnQ组)。

主要观察指标

视觉模拟量表(0 - 10)疼痛水平及服用的止痛药物量。

结果

出院后的所有时间点,OnQ组的术后平均疼痛评分均低于SSB组,但未达到统计学显著性。术后12小时,SSB组和OnQ组的疼痛评分分别为5.2和4.1(P = 0.1615)。术后24小时,SSB组和OnQ组的疼痛评分分别为5.4和4.8(P = 0.1918)。在这些相同时间点,服用的羟考酮分别为1.3和2.3(P = 0.8328和0.8617)。OnQ组24例患者中有5例出现泵故障,其中4例在48小时前被移除。

结论

与桡骨远端骨折的单次神经阻滞相比,OnQ泵在术后疼痛控制方面并无统计学上的显著改善,且未解决反跳痛问题。

证据级别

治疗性II级。有关证据级别的完整描述,请参阅作者指南。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验