From the Department of Surgery (K.N.L., J.T.H.P., E.P.-P., K.H., A.C., C.C.B., J.J.C., M.J.C., R.L., K.B.P., E.E.M., F.M.P.), Department of Anesthesiology (C.C.), and Department of Pharmacy (C.P.), Denver Health and Hospital Authority, Denver, Colorado.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2021 Nov 1;91(5):872-878. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003264.
Locoregional analgesia (LRA) remains underused in patients with chest wall injuries. Surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) offers an opportunity to deliver surgeon-directed LRA under direct visualization at the site of surgical intervention. We hypothesized that a single-dose liposomal bupivacaine (LB) intercostal nerve block provides comparable analgesia to an indwelling, peripheral nerve plane analgesic catheter with continuous bupivacaine infusion (IC), each placed during SSRF.
Noninferiority, single-center, randomized clinical trial (2017-2020) was performed. Patients were randomized to receive either IC or LB during SSRF. The IC was tunneled into the surgical field (subscapular space), and LB involved thoracoscopic intercostal blocks of ribs 3 to 8. The primary outcome was the Sequential Clinical Assessment of Respiratory Function score, measured daily for 5 days postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included daily narcotic equivalents and failure of primary LRA, defined as requiring a second LRA modality.
Thirty-four patients were enrolled: 16 IC and 18 LB. Age, Injury Severity Score, RibScore, Blunt Pulmonary Contusion Score, and use of nonnarcotic analgesics was similar between groups. Duration of IC was 4.5 days. There were three failures in the IC group versus one in the LB group (p = 0.23). There was no significant difference in Sequential Clinical Assessment of Respiratory Function score between the IC and LB groups. On postoperative days 2 to 4, narcotic requirements were less than half in the LB, as compared with the IC group; however, this difference was not statistically significant. Average wholesale price was US $605 for IC and US $434 for LB.
In this noninferiority trial, LB provided at least comparable and potentially superior LRA as compared with IC among patients undergoing SSRF.
Therapeutic, level II.
胸壁损伤患者局部区域镇痛(LRA)的应用仍不足。肋骨骨折手术固定术(SSRF)提供了在手术部位直接可视化下实施外科医生指导的 LRA 的机会。我们假设单次给予脂质体布比卡因(LB)肋间神经阻滞与连续布比卡因输注的留置外周神经平面镇痛导管(IC)提供相当的镇痛效果,两者均在 SSRF 期间放置。
这是一项非劣效性、单中心、随机临床试验(2017-2020 年)。患者随机接受 SSRF 期间的 IC 或 LB。IC 被隧道到手术部位(肩胛下空间),而 LB 涉及第 3 至 8 肋的胸腔镜肋间阻滞。主要结局是术后 5 天每天测量的连续临床评估呼吸功能评分。次要结局包括每日阿片类等效药物和主要 LRA 失败,定义为需要第二种 LRA 方式。
共纳入 34 例患者:16 例 IC 和 18 例 LB。年龄、损伤严重程度评分、肋骨评分、钝性肺挫伤评分和非阿片类镇痛药的使用在两组之间相似。IC 的持续时间为 4.5 天。IC 组有 3 例失败,LB 组有 1 例失败(p = 0.23)。IC 和 LB 组之间的连续临床评估呼吸功能评分无显著差异。在术后第 2 至 4 天,LB 组的阿片类药物需求比 IC 组少一半;然而,这一差异无统计学意义。IC 的平均批发价格为 605 美元,LB 的平均批发价格为 434 美元。
在这项非劣效性试验中,与 IC 相比,LB 在接受 SSRF 的患者中提供了至少相当且可能更优的 LRA。
治疗性,II 级。