Suppr超能文献

卡培他滨联合奥沙利铂与替吉奥作为D2根治术后Ⅲ期胃癌辅助化疗的比较

Comparison of capecitabine and oxaliplatin with S-1 as adjuvant chemotherapy in stage III gastric cancer after D2 gastrectomy.

作者信息

Cho Jang Ho, Lim Jae Yun, Cho Jae Yong

机构信息

Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2017 Oct 17;12(10):e0186362. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186362. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

AIM

To compare capecitabine and oxaliplatin (XELOX) with S-1 as adjuvant chemotherapy in stage III gastric cancer after D2 gastrectomy.

METHODS

Clinical data from 206 patients who received XELOX or S-1 regimens as adjuvant chemotherapy in stage III gastric cancer were collected. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to regimen; the groups were XELOX (n = 114) and S-1 monotherapy (n = 92).

RESULTS

3-year disease-free survival (DFS) was higher in the S-1 group than in the XELOX group (66.6% vs 59.1%; p = 0.636). 3-year overall survival (OS) was 75.6% in the S-1 group and 69.6% in the XELOX group (p = 0.495). But, the difference was not statistically significant. Especially, for patients with stage IIIC disease, 3-year overall survival was 55.2% in the XELOX group and 39.0% in the S-1 group (hazard ratio, HR 0.50, 95% confidence interval, CI 0.23-1.10; p = 0.075). In multivariate analysis, N stage (HR, 5.639; 95% CI, 1.297-24.522; p = 0.021) and cycle completion as planned (HR, 5.734; 95% CI, 3.007-10.936; p<0.001) were independent predictors of overall survival.

CONCLUSION

Adjuvant XELOX and S-1 regimen did not prove anything superior for stage III gastric cancer in this study. But, XELOX had a tendency to be superior to S-1 in stage IIIC gastric cancer after D2 gastrectomy although the difference was not statistically significant. N stage and cycle completion as planned were prognostic factors.

摘要

目的

比较卡培他滨联合奥沙利铂(XELOX)与替吉奥(S-1)作为Ⅲ期胃癌D2根治术后辅助化疗的效果。

方法

收集206例接受XELOX或S-1方案辅助化疗的Ⅲ期胃癌患者的临床资料。根据治疗方案将患者分为2组,即XELOX组(n = 114)和S-1单药治疗组(n = 92)。

结果

S-1组的3年无病生存率(DFS)高于XELOX组(66.6%对59.1%;p = 0.636)。S-1组的3年总生存率(OS)为75.6%,XELOX组为69.6%(p = 0.495)。但差异无统计学意义。特别是,对于ⅢC期疾病患者,XELOX组的3年总生存率为55.2%,S-1组为39.0%(风险比,HR 0.50,95%置信区间,CI 0.23 - 1.10;p = 0.075)。多因素分析中,N分期(HR,5.639;95% CI,1.297 - 24.522;p = 0.021)和按计划完成周期数(HR,5.734;95% CI,3.007 - 10.936;p<0.001)是总生存的独立预测因素。

结论

本研究中,辅助XELOX和S-1方案在Ⅲ期胃癌中未显示出任何优势。但是,尽管差异无统计学意义,在D2根治术后的ⅢC期胃癌中,XELOX有优于S-1的趋势。N分期和按计划完成周期数是预后因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c0ee/5645114/770923420391/pone.0186362.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验