Andronikou Savvas, Lambert Elena, Halton Jarred, Hilder Lucy, Crumley Iona, Lyttle Mark D, Kosack Cara
Department of Paediatric Radiology, Bristol Royal Hospital for Children, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
CRICBristol, 60 St. Michaels Hill, Bristol, BS2 8DX, United Kingdom.
Pediatr Radiol. 2017 Oct;47(11):1405-1411. doi: 10.1007/s00247-017-3944-4. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
National guidance from the United Kingdom and the United States on community-acquired pneumonia in children states that chest radiographs are not recommended routinely in uncomplicated cases. The main reason in the ambulatory setting is that there is no evidence of a substantial impact on clinical outcomes. However clinical practice and adherence to guidance is multifactorial and includes the clinical context (developed vs. developing world), the confidence of the attending physician, the changing incidence of complications (according to the success of immunisation programs), the availability of alternative imaging (and its relationship to perceived risks of radiation) and the reliability of the interpretation of imaging. In practice, chest radiographs are performed frequently for suspected pneumonia in children. Time pressures facing clinicians at the front line, difficulties in distinguishing which children require admission, restricted bed numbers for admissions, imaging-resource limitations, perceptions regarding risk from procedures, novel imaging modalities and the probability of other causes for the child's presentation all need to be factored into a guideline. Other drivers that often weigh in, depending on the setting, include cost-effectiveness and the fear of litigation. Not all guidelines designed for the developed world can therefore be applied to the developing world, and practice guidelines require regular review in the context of new information. In addition, radiologists must improve radiographic diagnosis of pneumonia, reach consensus on the interpretive terminology that clarifies their confidence regarding the presence of pneumonia and act to replace one imaging technique with another whenever there is proof of improved accuracy or reliability.
英国和美国关于儿童社区获得性肺炎的国家指南指出,对于无并发症的病例,不建议常规进行胸部X光检查。在门诊环境中,主要原因是没有证据表明其对临床结果有实质性影响。然而,临床实践和对指南的遵循是多因素的,包括临床背景(发达国家与发展中国家)、主治医生的信心、并发症发生率的变化(根据免疫计划的成功情况)、替代成像的可用性(及其与感知辐射风险的关系)以及成像解读的可靠性。在实际操作中,对于疑似肺炎的儿童,胸部X光检查经常进行。一线临床医生面临的时间压力、区分哪些儿童需要住院的困难、住院床位数量有限、成像资源限制、对检查风险的认知、新型成像方式以及儿童症状的其他可能病因等,都需要纳入指南考虑。根据具体情况,其他经常起作用的因素包括成本效益和对诉讼的担忧。因此,并非所有为发达国家制定的指南都能应用于发展中国家,实践指南需要根据新信息定期审查。此外,放射科医生必须提高肺炎的X光诊断水平,就明确其对肺炎存在信心的解读术语达成共识,并在有证据表明准确性或可靠性提高时,采取行动用另一种成像技术取代现有技术。