Suppr超能文献

fidaxomicin 与万古霉素治疗特定患者人群中艰难梭菌相关性腹泻的一线治疗:药物经济学评价。

Fidaxomicin versus Vancomycin as a First-Line Treatment for Clostridium difficile-Associated Diarrhea in Specific Patient Populations: A Pharmacoeconomic Evaluation.

机构信息

College of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.

Pharmacotherapy Education and Research Center, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas.

出版信息

Pharmacotherapy. 2017 Dec;37(12):1489-1497. doi: 10.1002/phar.2049. Epub 2017 Nov 27.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The reduction in recurrent Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea (CDAD) with fidaxomicin therapy may reduce hospital readmissions and lead to lower overall CDAD costs. However, studies assessing the cost-effectiveness of fidaxomicin as first-line therapy from the U.S. hospital perspective are lacking. This study evaluated the costs associated with utilizing fidaxomicin or vancomycin as a first-line therapy for CDAD in specific patient populations from a U.S. hospital perspective.

METHODS

A decision-analytic model was developed to estimate total costs (hospitalization and drug costs) associated with using fidaxomicin or vancomycin as first-line therapy for a first episode and up to two recurrences of CDAD in five patient populations: general population, elderly, patients receiving concomitant antibiotics, and patients with renal impairment or cancer.

RESULTS

The total cost of CDAD treatment using fidaxomicin first line in the general population was $14,442 per patient versus $14,179 per patient with vancomycin first line. In subgroup analyses, fidaxomicin use resulted in total hospital cost savings of $616 per patient in patients with cancer and $312 in patients with concomitant antibiotic use; vancomycin use was associated with total hospital cost savings of $243 per patient in the elderly and $371 in patients with renal impairment.

CONCLUSIONS

Fidaxomicin as first-line CDAD therapy is associated with similar total costs as compounded vancomycin oral solution in the general population. In elderly and renally impaired patients, slight increases in hospital cost were observed with fidaxomicin therapy, and in patients with cancer or concomitant antibiotic use, hospital cost savings were observed.

摘要

目的

fidaxomicin 治疗复发性艰难梭状芽孢杆菌相关性腹泻(CDAD)的减少可能降低医院再入院率,并导致总体 CDAD 成本降低。然而,缺乏从美国医院角度评估 fidaxomicin 作为一线治疗的成本效益的研究。本研究从美国医院的角度评估了在特定患者人群中使用 fidaxomicin 或万古霉素作为 CDAD 一线治疗的相关成本。

方法

开发了一个决策分析模型,以估计在 5 种患者人群(普通人群、老年人群、接受同时使用抗生素的患者、以及有肾功能不全或癌症的患者)中,使用 fidaxomicin 或万古霉素作为一线治疗首次发作和最多两次复发 CDAD 的总费用(住院和药物费用)。

结果

在普通人群中,使用 fidaxomicin 作为一线治疗的 CDAD 总治疗费用为每位患者 14,442 美元,而使用万古霉素作为一线治疗的费用为每位患者 14,179 美元。在亚组分析中,与使用万古霉素相比,fidaxomicin 的使用使癌症患者的每位患者的总住院费用节省了 616 美元,使同时使用抗生素的患者的每位患者的总住院费用节省了 312 美元;万古霉素的使用使老年患者的每位患者的总住院费用节省了 243 美元,使肾功能不全的患者的每位患者的总住院费用节省了 371 美元。

结论

在普通人群中,fidaxomicin 作为 CDAD 一线治疗与复合万古霉素口服液的总费用相似。在老年和肾功能不全的患者中,fidaxomicin 治疗观察到住院费用略有增加,而在癌症或同时使用抗生素的患者中,观察到住院费用节省。

相似文献

9
Antibiotic treatment for Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea in adults.成人艰难梭菌相关性腹泻的抗生素治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 3;3(3):CD004610. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004610.pub5.

引用本文的文献

4
Fidaxomicin to prevent recurrent : what will it cost in the USA and Canada?非达霉素预防复发:在美国和加拿大将花费多少?
JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2023 Jan 7;5(1):dlac138. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlac138. eCollection 2023 Feb.

本文引用的文献

3
Attributable inpatient costs of recurrent Clostridium difficile infections.复发性艰难梭菌感染的住院费用归因
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014 Nov;35(11):1400-7. doi: 10.1086/678428. Epub 2014 Sep 29.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验