Suppr超能文献

非达霉素与万古霉素治疗艰难梭菌感染的临床和经济效益比较。

Clinical and economic benefits of fidaxomicin compared to vancomycin for Clostridium difficile infection.

作者信息

Gallagher Jason C, Reilly Joseph P, Navalkele Bhagyashri, Downham Gemma, Haynes Kevin, Trivedi Manish

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy Practice, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

Atlanticare Regional Medical Center, Atlantic City, New Jersey, USA.

出版信息

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015 Nov;59(11):7007-10. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00939-15. Epub 2015 Aug 31.

Abstract

We studied the clinical and economic impact of a protocol encouraging the use of fidaxomicin as a first-line drug for treatment of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in patients hospitalized during a 2-year period. This study evaluated patients who received oral vancomycin or fidaxomicin for the treatment of CDI during a 2-year period. All included patients were eligible for administration of fidaxomicin via a protocol that encouraged its use for selected patients. The primary clinical endpoint was 90-day readmission with a diagnosis of CDI. Hospital charges and insurance reimbursements for readmissions were calculated along with the cost of CDI therapy to estimate the financial impact of the choice of therapy. Recurrences were seen in 10/49 (20.4%) fidaxomicin patients and 19/46 (41.3%) vancomycin patients (P = 0.027). In a multivariate analysis that included determinations of severity of CDI, serum creatinine increases, and concomitant antibiotic use, only fidaxomicin was significantly associated with decreased recurrence (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.12 to 0.93). The total lengths of stay of readmitted patients were 183 days for vancomycin and 87 days for fidaxomicin, with costs of $454,800 and $196,200, respectively. Readmissions for CDI were reimbursed on the basis of the severity of CDI, totaling $151,136 for vancomycin and $107,176 for fidaxomicin. Fidaxomicin drug costs totaled $62,112, and vancomycin drug costs were $6,646. We calculated that the hospital lost an average of $3,286 per fidaxomicin-treated patient and $6,333 per vancomycin-treated patient, thus saving $3,047 per patient with fidaxomicin. Fidaxomicin use for CDI treatment prevented readmission and decreased hospital costs compared to use of oral vancomycin.

摘要

我们研究了一项方案的临床和经济影响,该方案鼓励在两年期间将非达霉素作为治疗艰难梭菌感染(CDI)患者的一线药物。本研究评估了在两年期间接受口服万古霉素或非达霉素治疗CDI的患者。所有纳入的患者都符合通过一项鼓励将其用于特定患者的方案使用非达霉素的条件。主要临床终点是90天内再次入院并诊断为CDI。计算了再次入院的医院费用和保险报销费用以及CDI治疗费用,以估计治疗选择的财务影响。在49名非达霉素治疗患者中有10名(20.4%)出现复发,在46名万古霉素治疗患者中有19名(41.3%)出现复发(P = 0.027)。在一项多变量分析中,包括确定CDI的严重程度、血清肌酐升高以及同时使用抗生素,只有非达霉素与复发减少显著相关(调整后的优势比[aOR],0.33;95%置信区间[CI],0.12至0.93)。再次入院患者的总住院时间,万古霉素治疗的为183天,非达霉素治疗的为87天,费用分别为454,800美元和196,200美元。CDI再次入院的报销根据CDI的严重程度进行,万古霉素报销总额为151,136美元,非达霉素报销总额为107,176美元。非达霉素药物费用总计62,112美元,万古霉素药物费用为6,646美元。我们计算得出,每名接受非达霉素治疗的患者医院平均损失3,286美元,每名接受万古霉素治疗的患者医院平均损失6,333美元,因此使用非达霉素每名患者节省3,047美元。与使用口服万古霉素相比,使用非达霉素治疗CDI可预防再次入院并降低医院成本。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

5
A systematic review of real-world healthcare resource use and costs of infections.对感染的实际医疗资源使用和成本的系统评价。
Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2023 Jan 17;3(1):e17. doi: 10.1017/ash.2022.369. eCollection 2023.
6
Fidaxomicin to prevent recurrent : what will it cost in the USA and Canada?非达霉素预防复发:在美国和加拿大将花费多少?
JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2023 Jan 7;5(1):dlac138. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlac138. eCollection 2023 Feb.
10
Drug Utilization Evaluation (DUE) of vancomycin: A cross-sectional study.万古霉素的药物利用评价(DUE):一项横断面研究。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022 Jul 14;80:104169. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104169. eCollection 2022 Aug.

本文引用的文献

1
Burden of Clostridium difficile infection in the United States.美国艰难梭菌感染的负担
N Engl J Med. 2015 Feb 26;372(9):825-34. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1408913.
4
Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of Clostridium difficile infections.艰难梭菌感染的诊断、治疗和预防指南。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Apr;108(4):478-98; quiz 499. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.4. Epub 2013 Feb 26.
9

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验