D'Souza N, Marsden M, Bottomley S, Nagarajah N, Scutt F, Toh S
Department of General Surgery, Queen Alexandra Hospital , Portsmouth , UK.
Academic Department of Military Surgery and Trauma, Royal Centre for Defence Medicine , London , UK.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2018 Jan;100(1):47-51. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2017.0132. Epub 2017 Oct 19.
Introduction The misdiagnosis of appendicitis and consequent removal of a normal appendix occurs in one in five patients in the UK. On the contrary, in healthcare systems with routine cross-sectional imaging of suspected appendicitis, the negative appendicectomy rate is around 5%. If we could reduce the rate in the UK to similar numbers, would this be cost effective? This study aimed to calculate the financial impact of negative appendicectomy at the Queen Alexandra Hospital and to explore whether a policy of routine imaging of such patients could reduce hospital costs. Materials and methods We performed a retrospective analysis of all appendicectomies over a 1-year period at our institution. Data were extracted on outcomes including appendix histology, operative time and length of stay to calculate the negative appendicectomy rate and to analyse costs. Results A total of 531 patients over 5 years of age had an appendicectomy. The negative appendicectomy rate was 22% (115/531). The additional financial costs of negative appendicectomy to the hospital during this period were £270,861. Universal imaging of all patients with right iliac fossa pain that could result in a 5% negative appendicectomy rate would cost between £67,200 and £165,600 per year but could save £33,896 (magnetic resonance imaging), £105,896 (computed tomography) or £132,296 (ultrasound) depending on imaging modality used. Conclusions Negative appendicectomy is still too frequent and results in additional financial burden to the health service. Routine imaging of patients with suspected appendicitis would not only reduce the negative appendicectomy rate but could lead to cost savings and a better service for our patients.
在英国,五分之一的患者会被误诊为阑尾炎,随后切除正常的阑尾。相反,在对疑似阑尾炎患者进行常规横断面成像的医疗系统中,阴性阑尾切除率约为5%。如果我们能将英国的这一比率降至类似水平,这是否具有成本效益?本研究旨在计算亚历山德拉女王医院阴性阑尾切除术的财务影响,并探讨对此类患者进行常规成像的政策是否能降低医院成本。材料与方法:我们对本机构1年内所有阑尾切除术进行了回顾性分析。提取了包括阑尾组织学、手术时间和住院时间等结果的数据,以计算阴性阑尾切除率并分析成本。结果:共有531名5岁以上患者接受了阑尾切除术。阴性阑尾切除率为22%(115/531)。在此期间,阴性阑尾切除术给医院带来的额外财务成本为270,861英镑。对所有右下腹疼痛患者进行普遍成像,可使阴性阑尾切除率降至5%,每年成本在67,200英镑至165,600英镑之间,但根据所使用的成像方式,可节省33,896英镑(磁共振成像)、105,896英镑(计算机断层扫描)或132,296英镑(超声)。结论:阴性阑尾切除术仍然过于频繁,给医疗服务带来了额外的财务负担。对疑似阑尾炎患者进行常规成像不仅会降低阴性阑尾切除率,还可能节省成本,并为我们的患者提供更好的服务。