You Yang, Wu Bo, Yang Yi-Wei, Wang Yan-Wei, Liu Song, Zhu Qi-Li, Qin Han, Tan Fu-Rong, Ruan Zhi-Yong, Ma Ke-Dong, Dai Li-Chun, Zhang Min, Hu Guo-Quan, He Ming-Xiong
Biomass Energy Technology Research Centre, Key Laboratory of Development and Application of Rural Renewable Energy (Ministry of Agriculture), Biogas Institute of Ministry of Agriculture, Section 4-13, Renmin Nanlu, Chengdu, 610041 People's Republic of China.
Key Laboratory of Microbial Resources (Ministry of Agriculture, China), Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, CAAS, Beijing, 100081 People's Republic of China.
Biotechnol Biofuels. 2017 Oct 16;10:236. doi: 10.1186/s13068-017-0921-y. eCollection 2017.
Environmental issues, such as the fossil energy crisis, have resulted in increased public attention to use bioethanol as an alternative renewable energy. For ethanol production, water and nutrient consumption has become increasingly important factors being considered by the bioethanol industry as reducing the consumption of these resources would decrease the overall cost of ethanol production. Biogas slurry contains not only large amounts of wastewater, but also the nutrients required for microbial growth, e.g., nitrogen, ammonia, phosphate, and potassium. Therefore, biogas slurry is an attractive potential resource for bioethanol production that could serve as an alternative to process water and nitrogen sources.
In this study, we propose a method that replaces the process water and nitrogen sources needed for cellulosic ethanol production by with biogas slurry. To test the efficacy of these methods, corn straw degradation following pretreatment with diluted NaOH and enzymatic hydrolysis in the absence of fresh water was evaluated. Then, ethanol fermentation using the ethanologenic bacterial strain ZMT2 was conducted without supplementing with additional nitrogen sources. After pretreatment with 1.34% NaOH (w/v) diluted in 100% biogas slurry and continuous enzymatic hydrolysis for 144 h, 29.19 g/L glucose and 12.76 g/L xylose were generated from 30 g dry corn straw. The maximum ethanol concentration acquired was 13.75 g/L, which was a yield of 72.63% ethanol from the hydrolysate medium. Nearly 94.87% of the ammonia nitrogen was depleted and no nitrate nitrogen remained after ethanol fermentation. The use of biogas slurry as an alternative to process water and nitrogen sources may decrease the cost of cellulosic ethanol production by 10.0-20.0%. By combining pretreatment with NaOH diluted in biogas slurry, enzymatic hydrolysis, and ethanol fermentation, 56.3 kg of ethanol was produced by ZMT-2 through fermentation of 1000 kg of dried corn straw.
In this study, biogas slurry replaced process water and nitrogen sources during cellulosic ethanol production. The results suggest that biogas slurry is a potential alternative to water when pretreating corn straw and, thus, has important potential applications in cellulosic ethanol production from corn straw. This study not only provides a novel method for utilizing biogas slurry, but also demonstrates a means of reducing the overall cost of cellulosic ethanol.
诸如化石能源危机等环境问题已使公众愈发关注将生物乙醇用作替代可再生能源。对于乙醇生产而言,水和养分消耗已成为生物乙醇行业日益重视的因素,因为减少这些资源的消耗会降低乙醇生产的总体成本。沼液不仅含有大量废水,还含有微生物生长所需的养分,例如氮、氨、磷酸盐和钾。因此,沼液是生物乙醇生产中一种有吸引力的潜在资源,可替代工艺用水和氮源。
在本研究中,我们提出了一种用沼液替代纤维素乙醇生产所需的工艺用水和氮源的方法。为测试这些方法的效果,评估了在不使用淡水的情况下,用稀释的氢氧化钠预处理和酶水解后玉米秸秆的降解情况。然后,在不添加额外氮源的情况下,使用产乙醇细菌菌株ZMT2进行乙醇发酵。在用100%沼液稀释的1.34%氢氧化钠(w/v)预处理并连续酶水解144小时后,30克干玉米秸秆产生了29.19克/升葡萄糖和12.76克/升木糖。获得的最大乙醇浓度为13.75克/升,占水解产物培养基中乙醇产率的72.63%。乙醇发酵后,近94.87%的氨氮被消耗,且没有残留硝酸盐氮。使用沼液替代工艺用水和氮源可能会使纤维素乙醇生产成本降低10.0 - 20.0%。通过将用沼液稀释的氢氧化钠预处理、酶水解和乙醇发酵相结合,ZMT - 2通过发酵1000千克干玉米秸秆生产了56.3千克乙醇。
在本研究中,沼液在纤维素乙醇生产过程中替代了工艺用水和氮源。结果表明,沼液在预处理玉米秸秆时是水的一种潜在替代品,因此在玉米秸秆纤维素乙醇生产中具有重要的潜在应用价值。本研究不仅提供了一种利用沼液的新方法,还展示了一种降低纤维素乙醇总体成本的手段。