• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

着装“密码”:着装规则、礼仪与认知

Dressing "in code": Clothing rules, propriety, and perceptions.

作者信息

Gurung Regan A R, Brickner Michaella, Leet Mary, Punke Elizabeth

机构信息

a University of Wisconsin.

出版信息

J Soc Psychol. 2018;158(5):553-557. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2017.1393383. Epub 2017 Nov 8.

DOI:10.1080/00224545.2017.1393383
PMID:29048254
Abstract

Does dressing in line with societal clothing rules make a woman appear more professional and competent? We used a within-subjects design and tested if participants rated women dressed in compliance with school and workplace clothing rules more positively than women not dressed in compliance with rules. Participants (N = 89) at a mid-sized mid-western university rated 10 pictures of women captured from the internet on 11 attributes. Participants rated the five women dressed following clothing rules higher on a composite measure of positive attributes (intelligent, competent, powerful, organized, efficient, and professional), F(1, 86) = 68.92, p < .001 η = .45. Participant's ratings did not correlate with their own self-reported levels of sexism. Participants' gender was not a significant correlate. Our findings indicate that how students perceive women significantly relates to dressing in code. Participants rated women in less revealing and less tight clothing more positively.

摘要

穿着符合社会着装规范会让女性显得更专业、更有能力吗?我们采用了被试内设计,测试参与者对穿着符合学校和职场着装规范的女性的评价是否比对穿着不符合规范的女性更积极。一所位于中西部的中型大学的参与者(N = 89)对从网上获取的10张女性照片的11个属性进行了评分。参与者在积极属性(聪明、有能力、有权力、有条理、有效率和专业)的综合衡量指标上,对按照着装规范穿着的五名女性的评分更高,F(1, 86) = 68.92,p <.001,η =.45。参与者的评分与他们自己自我报告的性别歧视水平无关。参与者的性别不是一个显著的相关因素。我们的研究结果表明,学生对女性的看法与着装规范有显著关系。参与者对穿着不那么暴露、不那么紧身的女性评价更高。

相似文献

1
Dressing "in code": Clothing rules, propriety, and perceptions.着装“密码”:着装规则、礼仪与认知
J Soc Psychol. 2018;158(5):553-557. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2017.1393383. Epub 2017 Nov 8.
2
Power and provocativeness: The effects of subtle changes in clothing on perceptions of working women.权力与挑衅性:着装的细微变化对职业女性认知的影响
J Soc Psychol. 2018;158(2):252-255. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2017.1331991. Epub 2017 Aug 14.
3
The influence of T-shirt graphics on perceptions and behavioral intentions.T 恤图案对认知和行为意向的影响。
J Soc Psychol. 2019;159(3):328-339. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2018.1491471. Epub 2018 Jul 17.
4
Students' perceptions of male teachers: effects of teachers' dress and students' characteristics.学生对男教师的看法:教师着装及学生特征的影响
Percept Mot Skills. 1991 Dec;73(3 Pt 1):943-51. doi: 10.2466/pms.1991.73.3.943.
5
Effect of different professions' clothing on children's height perception.不同职业服装对儿童身高感知的影响。
Span J Psychol. 2012 Nov;15(3):1038-42. doi: 10.5209/rev_sjop.2012.v15.n3.39394.
6
Perceptions of low agency and high sexual openness mediate the relationship between sexualization and sexual aggression.低能动性和高性开放性的认知在性化与性侵犯之间的关系中起中介作用。
Aggress Behav. 2016 Sep;42(5):483-97. doi: 10.1002/ab.21644. Epub 2016 Feb 5.
7
Effects of religious veiling on Muslim men's attractiveness ratings of Muslim women.宗教面纱对穆斯林男性对穆斯林女性吸引力评价的影响。
Arch Sex Behav. 2014 Aug;43(6):1083-6. doi: 10.1007/s10508-014-0259-5. Epub 2014 Jan 25.
8
Dressing up social psychology: Empirically investigating the psychological functions of clothing using the example of symbolic protection.打扮社会心理学:以符号保护为例,实证研究服装的心理功能。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2024 Apr;63(2):1003-1035. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12700. Epub 2023 Nov 27.
9
Sartorial eloquence: does it exist in the paediatrician-patient relationship?着装的说服力:它存在于儿科医生与患者的关系中吗?
BMJ. 1994;309(6970):1710-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6970.1710.
10
Gender differences in reactions to the sexualization of athletes.运动员形象被性化现象中的性别差异。
J Soc Psychol. 2015 Jan-Feb;155(1):1-11. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2014.959883. Epub 2014 Nov 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Search is a verb: systematic review searching as invisible labor.搜索是一个动词:系统综述搜索作为无形劳动。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2021 Jul 1;109(3):505-506. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2021.1226.