J Med Libr Assoc. 2021 Jul 1;109(3):505-506. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2021.1226.
Invisible labor is a term used by labor economists to describe work that contributes, and is often even necessary, to the economy but largely goes unrecognized and unpaid. Despite the fact that systematic review searching is a significant task for many librarians and knowledge professionals, the search process can be considered a form of invisible labor because it often goes without recognition. This occurs sometimes through not granting authorship to the librarian who performed the intellectual contribution of search development and sometimes through a devaluing of the search process by the choice of language used to describe the search. By using the term search as a passive verb or noun, authors devalue the real intellectual labor involved in searching, which includes decisions related to search terms and combinations, database selection, and other search parameters. This commentary explores the context of how searching is described through the concept of invisible labor.
隐性劳动是劳动经济学家用来描述对经济有贡献且往往是必要的工作,但却很大程度上未得到认可和报酬的术语。尽管系统综述搜索对于许多图书馆员和知识专业人员来说是一项重要任务,但搜索过程本身可以被视为一种隐性劳动,因为它往往得不到认可。这种情况有时是因为没有将搜索开发的智力贡献归功于执行搜索的图书馆员,有时则是因为选择用来描述搜索的语言贬低了搜索过程。作者通过将搜索这个动词或名词用作被动语态,贬低了搜索过程中涉及的真正智力劳动,其中包括与搜索词和组合、数据库选择以及其他搜索参数相关的决策。这篇评论探讨了如何通过隐性劳动的概念来描述搜索的语境。