Suppr超能文献

墨尔本和丹佛市公园中的遮阳帆与被动式休闲:一项随机干预研究

Shade Sails and Passive Recreation in Public Parks of Melbourne and Denver: A Randomized Intervention.

作者信息

Buller David B, English Dallas R, Buller Mary Klein, Simmons Jody, Chamberlain James A, Wakefield Melanie, Dobbinson Suzanne

机构信息

David B. Buller and Mary Klein Buller are with Klein Buendel, Inc., Golden, CO. Dallas R. English is with the Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. Jody Simmons, Melanie Wakefield, and Suzanne Dobbinson are with the Centre for Behavioural Research in Cancer, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne. James A. Chamberlain is with the Cancer Epidemiology Centre, Cancer Council Victoria.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 2017 Dec;107(12):1869-1875. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.304071. Epub 2017 Oct 19.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To test whether shade sails will increase the use of passive recreation areas (PRAs).

METHODS

We conducted a stratified randomized pretest-posttest controlled design study in Melbourne, Australia, and Denver, Colorado, in 2010 to 2014. We randomized a sample of 144 public parks with 2 PRAs in full sun in a 1:3 ratio to treatment or control. Shade sails were built at 1 PRA per treatment park. The outcome was any use of the study PRA (n = 576 pretest and n = 576 posttest observations; 100% follow-up).

RESULTS

Compared with control PRAs (adjusted probability of use: pretest = 0.14, posttest = 0.17), use of treatment PRAs (pretest = 0.10, posttest = 0.32) was higher at posttest (odds ratio [OR] = 3.91; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.71, 8.94). Shade increased use of PRAs in Denver (control: pretest = 0.18, posttest = 0.19; treatment: pretest = 0.16, posttest = 0.47) more than Melbourne (control: pretest = 0.11, posttest = 0.14; shaded: pretest = 0.06, posttest = 0.19; OR = 2.98; 95% CI = 1.09, 8.14).

CONCLUSIONS

Public investment in shade is warranted for skin cancer prevention and may be especially useful in the United States.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT02971709.

摘要

目的

测试遮阳帆是否会增加被动休闲区(PRA)的使用。

方法

2010年至2014年,我们在澳大利亚墨尔本和科罗拉多州丹佛进行了一项分层随机前测-后测对照设计研究。我们将144个有两个完全暴露在阳光下的PRA的城市公园样本按1:3的比例随机分为治疗组或对照组。每个治疗组公园的一个PRA安装了遮阳帆。结果是研究PRA的任何使用情况(前测n = 576,后测n = 576观察值;100%随访)。

结果

与对照PRA相比(调整后的使用概率:前测 = 0.14,后测 = 0.17),治疗组PRA的使用情况(前测 = 0.10,后测 = 0.32)在后测时更高(优势比[OR] = 3.91;95%置信区间[CI] = 1.71, 。遮阳在丹佛增加PRA的使用(对照组:前测 = 0.18,后测 = 0.19;治疗组:前测 = 0.16,后测 = 0.47)比墨尔本更多(对照组:前测 = 0.11,后测 = 0.14;遮阳组:前测 = 0.06,后测 = 0.19;OR = 2.98;95% CI = 1.09, 8.14)。

结论

为预防皮肤癌,对遮阳设施进行公共投资是有必要的,在美国可能尤其有用。

试验注册

Clinicaltrials.gov标识符NCT02971709。 8.94)

相似文献

引用本文的文献

3
Physical Activity in Natural Settings: An Opportunity for Lifestyle Medicine.自然环境中的身体活动:生活方式医学的一个机遇。
Am J Lifestyle Med. 2024 May 11;19(1):73-87. doi: 10.1177/15598276241253211. eCollection 2025 Jan.

本文引用的文献

3
City planning and population health: a global challenge.城市规划与人群健康:全球性挑战。
Lancet. 2016 Dec 10;388(10062):2912-2924. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30066-6. Epub 2016 Sep 23.
4
Healthier neighbourhoods through healthier parks.通过更健康的公园打造更健康的社区。
Lancet. 2016 Dec 10;388(10062):2850-2851. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31579-3. Epub 2016 Sep 23.
5
The Global Burden of Cancer 2013.《2013 年全球癌症负担》。
JAMA Oncol. 2015 Jul;1(4):505-27. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.0735.
8
Shade provision for UV minimization: a review.用于最小化紫外线的遮阳措施:综述
Photochem Photobiol. 2014 May-Jun;90(3):479-90. doi: 10.1111/php.12237. Epub 2014 Feb 4.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验