*Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California; †Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; and ‡Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine, Long Island, NY.
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2017 Sep;27(7):1455-1463. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000001036.
Although preclinical studies suggest possible antitumor effects of metformin against cervical cancer, there is currently a lack of clinical data examining the association of metformin use and survival in women with cervical cancer. The aim of this study was to examine survival of women with cervical cancer who were receiving metformin.
This is a retrospective study examining consecutive cases of stages I to IV cervical cancer between 2000 and 2014. Patient demographics, medication use, tumor characteristics, treatment patterns, and survival outcomes were correlated to metformin use.
There were 70 (8.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 6.9-10.9) metformin users and 715 nonusers identified for the analysis. Median follow-up time was 22.6 months. Recurrence/progression of disease and death due to cervical cancer were observed in 236 and 163 cases, respectively. Metformin users were more likely to be older, hypertensive, diabetic, and dyslipidemic compared with nonusers (all, P < 0.05). On univariate analysis, metformin users and nonusers had similar progression-free survival (PFS) (5-year rates; 57.3% vs 61.8%; P = 0.82) and cervical cancer-specific overall survival (71.7% vs 70.7%; P = 0.86). After adjusting for patient demographics and tumor characteristics, metformin use was not associated with PFS (adjusted hazards ratio, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.70-1.74; P = 0.67) or cervical cancer-specific overall survival (adjusted hazards ratio, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.52-1.60; P = 0.75). Among 478 women who received whole pelvic radiotherapy, metformin use was not associated with PFS (P = 0.93) or cervical cancer-specific overall survival (P = 0.32).
In this study population, metformin use was not associated with survival of women with cervical cancer.
尽管临床前研究表明二甲双胍可能对宫颈癌有抗肿瘤作用,但目前缺乏检查二甲双胍使用与宫颈癌患者生存相关性的临床数据。本研究旨在探讨接受二甲双胍治疗的宫颈癌患者的生存情况。
这是一项回顾性研究,对 2000 年至 2014 年间的 I 期至 IV 期宫颈癌连续病例进行了研究。将患者人口统计学、药物使用、肿瘤特征、治疗模式和生存结果与二甲双胍使用相关联。
共确定了 70 名(8.9%;95%置信区间[CI],6.9-10.9)二甲双胍使用者和 715 名非使用者进行分析。中位随访时间为 22.6 个月。236 例患者出现疾病复发/进展,163 例患者死于宫颈癌。与非使用者相比,二甲双胍使用者更可能年龄较大、患有高血压、糖尿病和血脂异常(均 P < 0.05)。单因素分析显示,二甲双胍使用者和非使用者的无进展生存期(PFS)(5 年率;57.3% vs 61.8%;P = 0.82)和宫颈癌特异性总生存期(OS)(71.7% vs 70.7%;P = 0.86)相似。在校正患者人口统计学和肿瘤特征后,二甲双胍的使用与 PFS(调整后的危险比,1.11;95%CI,0.70-1.74;P = 0.67)或宫颈癌特异性 OS(调整后的危险比,0.91;95%CI,0.52-1.60;P = 0.75)无关。在接受全盆腔放疗的 478 名妇女中,二甲双胍的使用与 PFS(P = 0.93)或宫颈癌特异性 OS(P = 0.32)无关。
在本研究人群中,二甲双胍的使用与宫颈癌患者的生存无关。