Cruz Aristides I, DeFroda Steven F, Gil Joseph A, Hansen Heather, Bolous Alexandre, Procaccini Michaela, Zonfrillo Mark R
Department of Orthopaedics, Division of Pediatric Orthopaedic Surgery.
Department of Orthopaedics.
J Pediatr Orthop. 2019 Feb;39(2):e120-e124. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001091.
Long arm cast immobilization after operative and nonoperative treatment of pediatric upper extremity fractures is common. The use of a sling to aid in carrying the casted extremity as well as provide further immobilization is also common practice. Off-the-shelf slings vary in quality and fit, can be confusing for parents/patients to apply, and lead to frustration and dissatisfaction with its use. The purpose of this investigation was to compare patient/parent centered outcomes after the use of a customized sling compared with a standard sling by utilizing a prospective, randomized-controlled trial. We hypothesized that patients and their parents would find the "Providence" Pedi Cast-Sling (PPCS) to be more convenient and be more satisfied with its use compare with a standard sling.
Eligible subjects included patients 0 to 18 years old, evaluated at an urban, tertiary care pediatric emergency department (ED), who sustained an upper extremity fracture that required placement of a long-arm cast. Exclusion criteria were: open fractures; fractures at multiple levels; fractures requiring urgent/emergent surgery; admitted patients; bivalved casts. Patients were randomized to receive a standard sling or a PPCS. Questionnaires assessing patient/parent satisfaction, preferences, sling-use, and pain level were collected at patients' first follow-up visit.
A total of 100 patients were randomized with 71 questionnaires available for analysis (39 standard sling vs. 32 PPCS). There were statistically significant differences for satisfaction scores for all related questions between patients who received a PPCS compared with a standard sling. Patients and their parents were more likely to choose the PPCS (P=0.001), were more satisfied with the PPCS (P<0.006), and reported the PPCS to be more convenient than a standard sling (P<0.001). Patients who received a PPCS wore the sling for a greater number of hours during the day (10.3±7.1 h) compared with those who received a standard sling (5.9±5.0 h) (P=0.004).
The "Providence" Pedi Cast-Sling is a superior alternative to an off-the-shelf sling when used after the application of a long-arm cast providing greater convenience, compliance, and satisfaction to both patients and families.
Level I-Prospective randomized-controlled trial.
小儿上肢骨折经手术和非手术治疗后使用长臂石膏固定很常见。使用吊带辅助支撑石膏固定的肢体并提供进一步固定也是常见做法。市售吊带质量和尺寸各异,家长/患者使用时可能会感到困惑,导致使用时感到沮丧和不满。本研究的目的是通过前瞻性随机对照试验,比较使用定制吊带与标准吊带后以患者/家长为中心的结果。我们假设与标准吊带相比,患者及其家长会发现“普罗维登斯”小儿石膏吊带(PPCS)更方便且对其使用更满意。
符合条件的受试者包括0至18岁、在城市三级护理儿科急诊科接受评估、上肢骨折需要放置长臂石膏的患者。排除标准为:开放性骨折;多节段骨折;需要紧急/急诊手术的骨折;住院患者;双瓣石膏。患者随机分为接受标准吊带或PPCS。在患者首次随访时收集评估患者/家长满意度、偏好、吊带使用情况和疼痛程度的问卷。
共有100名患者被随机分组,71份问卷可供分析(39份标准吊带组 vs. 32份PPCS组)。与标准吊带组相比,接受PPCS的患者在所有相关问题上的满意度得分存在统计学显著差异。患者及其家长更倾向于选择PPCS(P = 0.001),对PPCS更满意(P < 0.006),并报告PPCS比标准吊带更方便(P < 0.001)。接受PPCS的患者白天佩戴吊带的时间(10.3±7.1小时)比接受标准吊带的患者(5.9±5.0小时)更长(P = 0.004)。
在应用长臂石膏后使用时,“普罗维登斯”小儿石膏吊带是市售吊带的优质替代品,能为患者和家庭带来更大的便利性、依从性和满意度。
I级——前瞻性随机对照试验。