Suppr超能文献

一种探索性随机对照试验,比较用于固定小儿上肢骨折的木质复合材料和合成玻璃纤维夹板系统。

An exploratory randomized controlled trial comparing wood-composite and synthetic fibreglass splint systems for the immobilization of paediatric upper limb fractures.

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.

Faculty of Engineering, Institute of Experimental Mechanics, Leipzig University of Applied Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

Bone Joint J. 2020 Oct;102-B(10):1405-1411. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B10.BJJ-2020-0236.R3.

Abstract

AIMS

This exploratory randomized controlled trial (RCT) aimed to determine the splint-related outcomes when using the novel biodegradable wood-composite splint (Woodcast) compared to standard synthetic fibreglass (Dynacast) for the immobilization of undisplaced upper limb fractures in children.

METHODS

An exploratory RCT was performed at a tertiary paediatric referral hospital between 1 June 2018 and 30 September 2019. The intention-to-treat population consisted of 170 patients (mean age 8.42 years (SD 3.42); Woodcast (WCG), n = 84, 57 male (67.9%); Dynacast (DNG), n = 86, 58 male (67.4%)). Patients with undisplaced upper limb fractures were randomly assigned to WCG or DNG treatment groups. Primary outcome was the stress stability of the splint material, defined as absence of any deformations or fractures within the splint during study period. Secondary outcomes included patient satisfaction and medical staff opinion. Additionally, biomechanical and chemical analysis of the splint samples was carried out.

RESULTS

Of the initial 170 patients, 168 (98.8%) completed at least one follow-up, and were included for analysis of the primary endpoint. Both treatment groups were well-matched regarding to age, sex, and type and localization of the fracture. Splint breakage occurred in three patients (3.6%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.007% to 0.102%) in the WCG and in three children (3.5%, 95% CI 0.007% to 0.09%) in the DNG (p > 0.99). The incidence of splint-related adverse events did not differ between the WCG (n = 21; 25.0%) and DNG (n = 24; 27.9%; p = 0.720). Under experimental conditions, the maximal tensile strength of Dynacast samples was higher than those deriving from Woodcast (mean 15.37 N/mm² (SD 1.37) vs 10.75 N/mm² (SD 1.20); p = 0.002). Chemical analysis revealed detection of polyisocyanate-prepolymer in Dynacast and polyester in Woodcast samples.

CONCLUSION

Splint-related adverse events appear similar between WCG and DNG treatment groups during the treatment of undisplaced forearm fractures. Cite this article: 2020;102-B(10):1405-1411.

摘要

目的

本探索性随机对照试验(RCT)旨在确定新型可生物降解木复合材料夹板(Woodcast)与标准合成玻璃纤维夹板(Dynacast)在固定儿童无移位上肢骨折时的夹板相关结果。

方法

2018 年 6 月 1 日至 2019 年 9 月 30 日,在一家三级儿科转诊医院进行了探索性 RCT。意向治疗人群包括 170 名患者(平均年龄 8.42 岁(SD 3.42);Woodcast(WCG),n = 84,57 名男性(67.9%);Dynacast(DNG),n = 86,58 名男性(67.4%))。将无移位上肢骨折患者随机分配至 WCG 或 DNG 治疗组。主要结局为夹板材料的应力稳定性,定义为研究期间夹板内无任何变形或骨折。次要结局包括患者满意度和医务人员意见。此外,还对夹板样本进行了生物力学和化学分析。

结果

最初的 170 名患者中,有 168 名(98.8%)至少完成了一次随访,纳入主要终点分析。两组在年龄、性别以及骨折类型和部位方面均匹配良好。WCG 中有 3 名患者(3.6%;95%置信区间(CI),0.007%至 0.102%)和 DNG 中有 3 名儿童(3.5%;95%CI 0.007%至 0.09%)出现夹板断裂(p>0.99)。WCG(n = 21;25.0%)和 DNG(n = 24;27.9%;p = 0.720)之间夹板相关不良事件的发生率无差异。在实验条件下,Dynacast 样本的最大拉伸强度高于 Woodcast 样本(平均 15.37 N/mm²(SD 1.37)比 10.75 N/mm²(SD 1.20);p = 0.002)。化学分析显示 Dynacast 中检测到异氰酸酯预聚物,Woodcast 中检测到聚酯。

结论

在治疗无移位前臂骨折时,WCG 和 DNG 治疗组之间夹板相关不良事件似乎相似。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验