• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中文版老年人综合虚弱评估工具的跨文化调适与验证。

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Comprehensive Frailty Assessment Instrument in Chinese community-dwelling older adults.

机构信息

Department of Nursing Fundamental, School of Nursing, Shandong University, Jinan, China.

Department of Nursing Fundamental, School of Nursing, Peking University, Jinan, China.

出版信息

Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2018 Feb;18(2):301-307. doi: 10.1111/ggi.13183. Epub 2017 Oct 20.

DOI:10.1111/ggi.13183
PMID:29052953
Abstract

AIM

To cross-culturally adapt and validate the Comprehensive Frailty Assessment Instrument (CFAI) among Chinese community-dwelling older adults.

METHODS

The Chinese CFAI was developed through forward-backward translations. An urban sample of 1235 community-dwelling older adults received face-to-face interviews to examine the validity (construct validity and criterion validity) and reliability (internal consistency and test-retest reliability).

RESULTS

The Chinese CFAI achieved semantic and idiomatic equivalence, and showed acceptable reliability and an expected factor structure, except for the social support domain. The exploratory factor analysis extracted five factors explaining 53.8% of the total variance of frailty. The confirmatory factor analysis showed that the data fit well to the second-order factor theoretical model, with a root mean square error of approximation of 0.05, Tucker-Lewis Index of 0.93 and Comparative Fit Index of 0.95. The receiver operating characteristic analysis presented an acceptable criterion validity using the Rockwood Frailty Index as an external criterion (area under the curve 0.80), with balanced sensitivity (65.31%) and specificity (81.19%) at the optimal 39-point frailty cut-off of the CFAI.

CONCLUSIONS

The Chinese CFAI has good validity and reliability as a practical frailty measure in Chinese community-dwelling older adults. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2018; 18: 301-307.

摘要

目的

跨文化调适和验证综合虚弱评估工具(CFAI)在中国社区居住的老年人中。

方法

通过正向和反向翻译开发了中文 CFAI。对 1235 名居住在社区的老年人进行了面对面访谈,以检验其有效性(构念效度和标准效度)和可靠性(内部一致性和重测信度)。

结果

中文 CFAI 实现了语义和习惯用法的等效性,具有可接受的可靠性和预期的因素结构,但社会支持领域除外。探索性因子分析提取了五个因素,解释了虚弱的总方差的 53.8%。验证性因子分析表明,数据与二阶因子理论模型拟合良好,逼近均方误差为 0.05,Tucker-Lewis 指数为 0.93,比较拟合指数为 0.95。使用 Rockwood 虚弱指数作为外部标准的受试者工作特征分析显示出可接受的标准效度(曲线下面积为 0.80),在 CFAI 的最佳 39 分虚弱切点处具有平衡的敏感性(65.31%)和特异性(81.19%)。

结论

中文 CFAI 作为一种实用的中国社区居住老年人虚弱评估工具,具有良好的有效性和可靠性。老年医学杂志 2018; 18: 301-307.

相似文献

1
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Comprehensive Frailty Assessment Instrument in Chinese community-dwelling older adults.中文版老年人综合虚弱评估工具的跨文化调适与验证。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2018 Feb;18(2):301-307. doi: 10.1111/ggi.13183. Epub 2017 Oct 20.
2
Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the FRAIL Scale in Chinese Community-Dwelling Older Adults.FRAIL 量表在中国社区居住的老年人中的跨文化调适和验证。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2018 Jan;19(1):12-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2017.06.011. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
3
Validation of the Persian version of the comprehensive frailty assessment instrument plus in community-dwelling older adults.全面虚弱评估工具加版波斯语版本在社区居住的老年人中的验证。
Geriatr Nurs. 2021 Nov-Dec;42(6):1287-1293. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2021.09.001. Epub 2021 Sep 22.
4
Assessment of frailty in Saudi community-dwelling older adults: validation of measurements.沙特社区居住老年人的衰弱评估:测量方法的验证
Ann Saudi Med. 2019 May-Jun;39(3):197-204. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2019.197. Epub 2019 May 30.
5
Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Groningen Frailty Indicator (GFI) among Chinese community-dwelling older adults.中文版老年人生活功能评估工具(GFI)的跨文化调适及其心理计量特性在社区居住的中国老年人中的应用。
Geriatr Nurs. 2020 May-Jun;41(3):236-241. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2019.10.002. Epub 2019 Oct 24.
6
CFAI-Plus: Adding cognitive frailty as a new domain to the comprehensive frailty assessment instrument.CFAI-Plus:在综合虚弱评估工具中增加认知脆弱性作为一个新的领域。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2018 Jul;33(7):941-947. doi: 10.1002/gps.4875. Epub 2018 Apr 10.
7
Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Validity, and Reliability Testing of the Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI) Amharic Version for Screening Frailty in Community-Dwelling Ethiopian Older People.跨文化调适、效度和信度检验阿姆哈拉语版提尔堡衰弱指标(TFI)用于社区居住的埃塞俄比亚老年人衰弱筛查。
Clin Interv Aging. 2023 Jul 24;18:1115-1127. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S416942. eCollection 2023.
8
Reliability and validity of the Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI) among Chinese community-dwelling older people.蒂尔堡衰弱指标(TFI)在中国社区居住老年人中的信度和效度
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2017 Nov;73:21-28. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2017.07.001. Epub 2017 Jul 15.
9
Psychometric analysis of the Arabic (Saudi) Tilburg Frailty Indicator among Saudi community-dwelling older adults.沙特社区居住的老年人群中,阿拉伯语(沙特)Tilburg 衰弱指标的心理测量学分析。
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2020 Sep-Oct;90:104128. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2020.104128. Epub 2020 May 29.
10
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the FRAIL-NH scale for Chinese nursing home residents: A methodological and cross-sectional study.衰弱评估工具- NH 量表的跨文化调适与验证:一项方法学与横断面研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2020 May;105:103556. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103556. Epub 2020 Mar 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Relationship between social capital and medication adherence among frail and pre-frail older people: a cross-sectional study from China.社会资本与虚弱及脆弱前期老年人药物依从性的关系:一项来自中国的横断面研究
BMC Public Health. 2025 Feb 5;25(1):477. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-21253-7.
2
A Hybrid Concept Analysis of Frailty Among Older Adults Living in the Community.社区老年人衰弱的混合概念分析
J Adv Nurs. 2025 May;81(5):2354-2367. doi: 10.1111/jan.16508. Epub 2024 Oct 1.
3
Urban-Rural Differences in the Association of eHealth Literacy With Medication Adherence Among Older People With Frailty and Prefrailty: Cross-Sectional Study.
城乡老年人衰弱和衰弱前期与药物依从性相关的电子健康素养差异:横断面研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Sep 11;10:e54467. doi: 10.2196/54467.
4
Research Progress on Frailty in Elderly People.老年人虚弱的研究进展。
Clin Interv Aging. 2024 Aug 29;19:1493-1505. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S474547. eCollection 2024.
5
Characterization of social frailty domains and related adverse health outcomes in the Asia-Pacific: a systematic literature review.亚太地区社会脆弱性领域的特征及其与不良健康结局的关系:系统文献回顾。
PeerJ. 2024 Mar 15;12:e17058. doi: 10.7717/peerj.17058. eCollection 2024.
6
Differences in the association of oral health knowledge, attitudes, and practices with frailty among community-dwelling older people in China.口腔健康知识、态度和行为与中国社区老年人衰弱的关联存在差异。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Oct 24;23(1):782. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03477-y.
7
Factors Associated with Medication Adherence among Community-Dwelling Older People with Frailty and Pre-Frailty in China.与中国社区居住的虚弱和衰弱前期老年人药物治疗依从性相关的因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 30;19(23):16001. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192316001.
8
Association of fear of falling with frailty in community-dwelling older adults: A cross-sectional study.社区居住的老年人中跌倒恐惧与虚弱的关系:一项横断面研究。
Nurs Health Sci. 2021 Jun;23(2):516-524. doi: 10.1111/nhs.12840. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
9
Instruments for the detection of frailty syndrome in older adults: A systematic review.用于检测老年人衰弱综合征的工具:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 29;14(4):e0216166. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216166. eCollection 2019.