1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine; and.
2Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yodogawa Christian Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
J Neurosurg. 2018 Sep;129(3):815-824. doi: 10.3171/2017.4.JNS162522. Epub 2017 Oct 20.
OBJECTIVE Peripheral nerve adhesion caused by extraneural and intraneural scar formation after neurolysis leads to nerve dysfunction. The authors previously developed a novel very flexible biodegradable nerve conduit composed of poly(L-lactide) and poly(ε-caprolactone) for use in peripheral nerve regeneration. In the present study, they investigated the effect of protective nerve wrapping on preventing adhesion in a rat sciatic nerve adhesion model. METHODS Rat sciatic nerves were randomly assigned to one of the following four groups: a no-adhesion group, which involved neurolysis alone without an adhesion procedure; an adhesion group, in which the adhesion procedure was performed after neurolysis, but no treatment was subsequently administered; a nerve wrap group, in which the adhesion procedure was performed after neurolysis and protective nerve wrapping was then performed with the nerve conduit; and a hyaluronic acid (HA) group, in which the adhesion procedure was performed after neurolysis and nerve wrapping was then performed with a 1% sodium HA viscous solution. Six weeks postoperatively, the authors evaluated the extent of scar formation using adhesion scores and biomechanical and histological examinations and assessed nerve function with electrophysiological examination and gastrocnemius muscle weight measurement. RESULTS In the adhesion group, prominent scar tissue surrounded the nerve and strongly adhered to the nerve biomechanically and histologically. The motor nerve conduction velocity and gastrocnemius muscle weight were the lowest in this group. Conversely, the adhesion scores were significantly lower, motor nerve conduction velocity was significantly higher, and gastrocnemius muscle weight was significantly higher in the nerve wrap group than in the adhesion group. Additionally, the biomechanical breaking strength was significantly lower in the nerve wrap group than in the adhesion group and HA group. The morphological properties of axons in the nerve wrap group were preserved. Intraneural macrophage invasion, as assessed by the number of CD68- and CCR7-positive cells, was less severe in the nerve wrap group than in the adhesion group. CONCLUSIONS The nerve conduit prevented post-neurolysis peripheral nerves from developing adhesion and allowed them to maintain their nerve function because it effectively blocked scarring and prevented adhesion-related damage in the peripheral nerves.
神经松解后外神经和内神经瘢痕形成导致周围神经粘连,从而导致神经功能障碍。作者先前开发了一种新型的非常灵活的可生物降解神经导管,由聚(L-丙交酯)和聚(ε-己内酯)组成,用于周围神经再生。在本研究中,他们研究了保护性神经包裹对预防大鼠坐骨神经粘连模型中粘连的影响。
大鼠坐骨神经随机分为以下四组之一:无粘连组,仅进行神经松解而不进行粘连程序;粘连组,在神经松解后进行粘连程序,但随后不进行任何治疗;神经包裹组,在神经松解后进行粘连程序,并随后用神经导管进行保护性神经包裹;和透明质酸(HA)组,在神经松解后进行粘连程序,并随后用 1%的 HA 粘性溶液进行神经包裹。术后 6 周,作者通过粘连评分以及生物力学和组织学检查评估瘢痕形成程度,并通过电生理学检查和比目鱼肌重量测量评估神经功能。
在粘连组中,明显的瘢痕组织环绕神经,并在生物力学和组织学上与神经强烈粘连。该组的运动神经传导速度和比目鱼肌重量最低。相反,与粘连组相比,神经包裹组的粘连评分显著降低,运动神经传导速度显著升高,比目鱼肌重量显著升高。此外,神经包裹组的生物力学断裂强度显著低于粘连组和 HA 组。神经包裹组的轴突形态特性得到保留。用 CD68 和 CCR7 阳性细胞数评估神经内巨噬细胞浸润,神经包裹组明显少于粘连组。
神经导管防止了神经松解后周围神经发生粘连,并保持了其神经功能,因为它有效地阻止了瘢痕形成,并防止了周围神经的粘连相关损伤。