Ubrich Romy, Barthel Petra, Haller Bernhard, Hnatkova Katerina, Huster Katharina Maria, Steger Alexander, Müller Alexander, Malik Marek, Schmidt Georg
Innere Medizin I, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Institut für Medizinische Statistik und Epidemiologie, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 20;12(10):e0186783. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186783. eCollection 2017.
Mortality rates in females who survived acute myocardial infarction (AMI) exceed those in males. Differences between sexes in age, cardiovascular risk factors and revascularization therapy have been proposed as possible reasons.
To select sets of female and male patients comparable in respect of relevant risk factors in order to compare the sex-specific risk in a systematic manner.
Data of the ISAR-RISK and ART studies were investigated. Patients were enrolled between 1996 and 2005 and suffered from AMI within 4 weeks prior to enrolment. Patients of each sex were selected with 1:1 equivalent age, previous AMI history, sinus-rhythm presence, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, smoking status, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and revascularization therapy. Survival times were compared between sex groups in the whole study cohort and in the matched cohort.
Of 3840 consecutive AMI survivors, 994 (25.9%) were females and 2846 (74.1%) were males. Females were older and suffered more frequently from hypertension and diabetes mellitus. In the whole cohort, females showed an increased mortality with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.54 compared to males (p<0.0001). The matched cohort comprised 802 patients of each sex and revealed a trend towards poorer survival in females (HR for female sex 1.14; p = 0.359). However, significant mortality differences with a higher risk in matched females was observed during the first year after AMI (HR = 1.61; p = 0.045) but not during the subsequent years.
Matched sub-groups of post-AMI patients showed a comparable long-term mortality. However, a female excess mortality remained during first year after AMI and cannot be explained by differences in age, cardiovascular risk factors, and modes of acute treatment. Other causal factors, including clinical as well as psychological and social aspects, need to be considered. Female post-AMI patients should be followed more actively particularly during the first year after AMI.
急性心肌梗死(AMI)存活女性的死亡率高于男性。年龄、心血管危险因素和血运重建治疗方面的性别差异被认为是可能的原因。
选择在相关危险因素方面具有可比性的女性和男性患者组,以便系统地比较性别特异性风险。
对ISAR-RISK和ART研究的数据进行了调查。患者于1996年至2005年入组,且在入组前4周内患有AMI。按照年龄、既往AMI病史、窦性心律、高血压、糖尿病、吸烟状况、左心室射血分数(LVEF)和血运重建治疗1:1对等的原则选择各性别的患者。在整个研究队列和匹配队列中比较性别组之间的生存时间。
在3840例连续的AMI存活者中,994例(25.9%)为女性,2846例(74.1%)为男性。女性年龄更大,高血压和糖尿病的患病率更高。在整个队列中,女性的死亡率增加,与男性相比,风险比(HR)为1.54(p<0.0001)。匹配队列包括各802例男女患者,显示女性生存趋势较差(女性性别HR为1.14;p = 0.359)。然而,在AMI后的第一年观察到匹配女性中存在显著的死亡率差异且风险更高(HR = 1.61;p = 0.045),但在随后几年中未观察到。
AMI后患者的匹配亚组显示出相当的长期死亡率。然而,AMI后第一年女性死亡率仍然过高,且不能用年龄、心血管危险因素和急性治疗方式的差异来解释。需要考虑其他因果因素,包括临床以及心理和社会方面。AMI后女性患者应更积极地随访,特别是在AMI后的第一年。