Suppr超能文献

比较接受非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术且行或未行冠状动脉内膜切除术患者的短期和长期生存率。

Comparing short and long term survival of patients undergoing off pump coronary artery bypass graft with and without coronary endarterectomy.

作者信息

Sabzi Feridoun, Asadmobini Atefeh, Rezaei Mansour

机构信息

Cardiovascular Research Center, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.

Cardiovascular Research Center, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.

出版信息

Indian Heart J. 2017 Sep-Oct;69(5):646-650. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2017.02.008. Epub 2017 Feb 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

There is some controversy about survival of coronary endarterectomy (CE) patients, so the current study aims to compare short and long term survival of patients undergoing off pump coronary artery bypass graft (OPCAB) with and without coronary endarterectomy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

we performed a retrospective analysis of data on patients undergoing OPCAB and CE between 2011 and 2012. Preoperative, perioperative and postoperative data collected from data bank. Follow-up information was obtained from telephone contact mean time 37.13±23.82months after surgery. Early and late outcomes were compared by univariate and Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULT

OPCAB was performed in 474 patients, which 69 of them had a CE. The mean long term survival was similar between OPCAB (56.28±0.61) and OPCAB+CE (55.54±1.3) groups (p=0.66). Multiple Cox regression shows that age, gender, BMI, EF and angina were significant predictors of mortality. Patients undergoing CE have a long term intensive care unit (ICU) stay (51.31±5.59 vs 37.23±0.88, P=0.015) and blood transfusion was higher in CE group (650.62±110 vs. 324.71±22, P=0.001).

CONCLUSION

The current study demonstrates that results of CE are acceptable with respect to short and long -term survival. Patients undergoing CE required long term ICU stay and higher blood transfusion.

摘要

背景与目的

冠状动脉内膜切除术(CE)患者的生存率存在一些争议,因此本研究旨在比较接受非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术(OPCAB)且行或不行冠状动脉内膜切除术患者的短期和长期生存率。

患者与方法

我们对2011年至2012年间接受OPCAB和CE的患者数据进行了回顾性分析。从数据库中收集术前、围手术期和术后数据。通过电话联系获得随访信息,平均随访时间为术后37.13±23.82个月。通过单因素分析和Kaplan-Meier分析比较早期和晚期结果。

结果

474例患者接受了OPCAB,其中69例接受了CE。OPCAB组(56.28±0.61)和OPCAB+CE组(55.54±1.3)的平均长期生存率相似(p=0.66)。多因素Cox回归显示,年龄、性别、BMI、EF和心绞痛是死亡率的重要预测因素。接受CE的患者长期入住重症监护病房(ICU)(51.31±5.59 vs 37.23±0.88,P=0.015),且CE组输血率更高(650.62±110 vs. 324.71±22,P=0.001)。

结论

本研究表明,就短期和长期生存率而言,CE的结果是可以接受的。接受CE的患者需要长期入住ICU且输血率更高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf90/5650583/8f060a973b38/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验