• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后,心绞痛药物降级对健康状况的影响。

The Impact of De-escalation of Antianginal Medications on Health Status After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

机构信息

Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, MO

University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Oct 20;6(10):e006405. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.006405.

DOI:10.1161/JAHA.117.006405
PMID:29054844
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5721850/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Antianginal medications (AAMs) can be perceived to be less important after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and may be de-escalated after revascularization. We examined the frequency of AAM de-escalation at discharge post-PCI and its association with follow-up health status.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In a 10-center PCI registry, the Seattle Angina Questionnaire was assessed before and 6 months post-PCI. AAM de-escalation was defined as fewer AAMs at discharge versus admission or >25% absolute dose decrease. Of 2743 PCI patients (70% male), AAM were de-escalated, escalated, and unchanged in 299 (11%), 714 (26%), and 1730 (63%) patients, respectively. Patients whose AAM were de-escalated were more likely to report angina at 6 months, compared with unchanged or escalated AAM (34% versus 24% versus 21%; <0.001). The association of AAM de-escalation with health status was examined using multivariable models adjusting for the predicted risk of post-PCI angina, completeness of revascularization, and the interaction of AAM de-escalation×completeness of revascularization. There was a significant interaction between AAM de-escalation and completeness of revascularization (<0.001), suggesting that AAM de-escalation was associated with greater impairment of health status among patients with incomplete revascularization. In patients with incomplete revascularization, de-escalation of AAM at discharge was associated with 43% increased angina risk (relative risk, 1.43; 95% confidence interval, 1.26-1.63) and worse angina-related health status at 6 months post-PCI.

CONCLUSIONS

De-escalation of AAM occurs in 1 in 10 patients post-PCI, and it is associated with an increased risk of angina and worse health status, particularly among those with incomplete revascularization.

摘要

背景

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后,人们可能会认为抗心绞痛药物(AAMs)不那么重要,并且在血运重建后可能会减少剂量。我们研究了 PCI 后出院时 AAMs 剂量减少的频率及其与随访健康状况的关系。

方法和结果

在一个 10 中心 PCI 注册研究中,西雅图心绞痛问卷(SAQ)在 PCI 术前和术后 6 个月进行评估。AAMs 剂量减少定义为出院时与入院时相比,AAMs 种类减少或绝对剂量减少>25%。在 2743 例 PCI 患者(70%为男性)中,分别有 299 例(11%)、714 例(26%)和 1730 例(63%)患者的 AAMs 剂量减少、增加或不变。与 AAMs 剂量不变或增加的患者相比,AAMs 剂量减少的患者在 6 个月时更有可能报告心绞痛(34%比 24%比 21%;<0.001)。使用多变量模型,调整 PCI 后心绞痛的预测风险、血运重建的完整性以及 AAMs 剂量减少与血运重建完整性的交互作用,检验了 AAMs 剂量减少与健康状况之间的关系。AAMs 剂量减少与血运重建完整性之间存在显著的交互作用(<0.001),提示在血运重建不完全的患者中,AAMs 剂量减少与健康状况的恶化更相关。在血运重建不完全的患者中,出院时 AAMs 剂量减少与心绞痛风险增加 43%(相对风险,1.43;95%置信区间,1.26-1.63)和 PCI 术后 6 个月时更差的心绞痛相关健康状况相关。

结论

10 例 PCI 患者中就有 1 例会减少 AAMs 剂量,这与心绞痛风险增加和健康状况恶化相关,尤其是在血运重建不完全的患者中。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a91/5721850/5a90bd6a754c/JAH3-6-e006405-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a91/5721850/ccafeeb3db85/JAH3-6-e006405-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a91/5721850/8467776f103f/JAH3-6-e006405-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a91/5721850/5a90bd6a754c/JAH3-6-e006405-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a91/5721850/ccafeeb3db85/JAH3-6-e006405-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a91/5721850/8467776f103f/JAH3-6-e006405-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a91/5721850/5a90bd6a754c/JAH3-6-e006405-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
The Impact of De-escalation of Antianginal Medications on Health Status After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后,心绞痛药物降级对健康状况的影响。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Oct 20;6(10):e006405. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.006405.
2
Patient Characteristics Associated With Antianginal Medication Escalation and De-Escalation Following Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.慢性完全闭塞性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后抗心绞痛药物升级和降级相关的患者特征
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019 Jun;12(6):e005287. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.118.005287. Epub 2019 Jun 12.
3
De-escalation of antianginal medications after successful chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention: Frequency and relationship with health status.成功的慢性完全闭塞经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后抗心绞痛药物的降级:频率和与健康状况的关系。
Am Heart J. 2019 Aug;214:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2019.04.013. Epub 2019 Apr 26.
4
Anti-anginal medication titration among patients with residual angina 6-months after chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from OPEN CTO registry.慢性完全闭塞经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 6 个月后残余心绞痛患者的抗心绞痛药物滴定:来自 OPEN CTO 注册研究的结果。
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2019 Oct 1;5(4):370-379. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcz015.
5
Management of Persistent Angina After Myocardial Infarction Treated With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From the TRANSLATE-ACS Study.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后心肌梗死后持续性心绞痛的管理:来自 TRANSLATE-ACS 研究的见解。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Oct 19;6(10):e007007. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.007007.
6
Do differences in repeat revascularization explain the antianginal benefits of bypass surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention?: implications for future treatment comparisons.再次血运重建的差异是否解释了搭桥手术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗相比的抗心绞痛益处?对未来治疗比较的启示。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012 May;5(3):267-75. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.111.964585. Epub 2012 Apr 10.
7
Multivessel Versus Culprit Vessel-Only Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: Insights From the TRANSLATE-ACS Observational Study.多血管病变与罪犯血管病变PCI 治疗急性心肌梗死患者:来自 TRANSLATE-ACS 观察性研究的见解。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Oct 5;6(10):e006343. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.006343.
8
Quality of Life Changes After Chronic Total Occlusion Angioplasty in Patients With Baseline Refractory Angina.基线难治性心绞痛患者慢性完全闭塞血管成形术后生活质量的变化。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Mar;12(3):e007558. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007558.
9
The Relationship of Body Mass Index to Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Outcomes: Does the Obesity Paradox Exist in Contemporary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Cohorts? Insights From the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society Registry.体重指数与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗结局的关系:肥胖悖论是否存在于当代经皮冠状动脉介入治疗队列中?来自英国心血管介入学会注册中心的见解。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Jul 10;10(13):1283-1292. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.03.013.
10
Impact of treatment strategies on outcomes in patients with stable coronary artery disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus according to presenting angina severity: A pooled analysis of three federally-funded randomized trials.根据首发心绞痛严重程度评估稳定型冠状动脉疾病合并 2 型糖尿病患者的治疗策略对结局的影响:三项联邦资助的随机试验的汇总分析。
Atherosclerosis. 2018 Oct;277:186-194. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2018.04.005. Epub 2018 Jun 1.

引用本文的文献

1
De-escalation of antianginal medications after successful chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention: Frequency and relationship with health status.成功的慢性完全闭塞经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后抗心绞痛药物的降级:频率和与健康状况的关系。
Am Heart J. 2019 Aug;214:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2019.04.013. Epub 2019 Apr 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Prediction of residual angina after percutaneous coronary intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后残余心绞痛的预测
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2015 Jul 1;1(1):23-30. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcv010.
2
Angina and associated healthcare costs following percutaneous coronary intervention: A real-world analysis from a multi-payer database.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的心绞痛及相关医疗费用:来自多支付方数据库的真实世界分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Dec;88(7):1017-1024. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26365. Epub 2016 Jan 17.
3
Effects of Ranolazine on Angina and Quality of Life After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Incomplete Revascularization: Results From the Ranolazine for Incomplete Vessel Revascularization (RIVER-PCI) Trial.
雷诺嗪对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后不完全血运重建心绞痛和生活质量的影响:来自雷诺嗪治疗不完全血管重建(RIVER-PCI)试验的结果。
Circulation. 2016 Jan 5;133(1):39-47. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.019768. Epub 2015 Nov 10.
4
Improving the process of informed consent for percutaneous coronary intervention: patient outcomes from the Patient Risk Information Services Manager (ePRISM) study.改善经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的知情同意流程:患者风险信息服务管理器(ePRISM)研究的患者结局
Am Heart J. 2015 Feb;169(2):234-241.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.11.008. Epub 2014 Nov 15.
5
Comparison of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire With Daily Angina Diary in the TERISA Clinical Trial.在TERISA临床试验中西雅图心绞痛问卷与每日心绞痛日记的比较。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2014 Nov;7(6):844-50. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.113.000752. Epub 2014 Sep 23.
6
Development and validation of a short version of the Seattle angina questionnaire.西雅图心绞痛问卷简版的开发与验证
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2014 Sep;7(5):640-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.114.000967. Epub 2014 Sep 2.
7
2014 ACC/AHA/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS focused update of the guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons.2014年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会/美国胸外科医师协会/预防心血管护士协会/心血管造影和介入学会/胸外科医师学会对稳定型缺血性心脏病患者诊断和管理指南的重点更新:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组、美国胸外科医师协会、预防心血管护士协会、心血管造影和介入学会及胸外科医师学会的报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Nov 4;64(18):1929-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.07.017. Epub 2014 Jul 28.
8
Derivation and validation of a risk standardization model for benchmarking hospital performance for health-related quality of life outcomes after acute myocardial infarction.用于急性心肌梗死后健康相关生活质量结局的医院绩效基准比较的风险标准化模型的推导和验证。
Circulation. 2014 Jan 21;129(3):313-20. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.001773. Epub 2013 Oct 25.
9
β-Blocker use and clinical outcomes in stable outpatients with and without coronary artery disease.β受体阻滞剂在稳定型冠心病和非冠心病患者中的应用及临床结局。
JAMA. 2012 Oct 3;308(13):1340-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.12559.
10
Effects of optimal medical treatment with or without coronary revascularization on angina and subsequent revascularizations in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and stable ischemic heart disease.最佳药物治疗联合或不联合冠状动脉血运重建对 2 型糖尿病合并稳定型缺血性心脏病患者心绞痛及后续血运重建的影响。
Circulation. 2011 Apr 12;123(14):1492-500. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.978247. Epub 2011 Mar 28.