Department of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Lincoln University, PO Box 85084, Lincoln, 7647, Christchurch, Canterbury, New Zealand.
Department of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Lincoln University, PO Box 85084, Lincoln, 7647, Christchurch, Canterbury, New Zealand.
J Dairy Sci. 2018 Jan;101(1):257-267. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-12807. Epub 2017 Oct 18.
The objective of this study was to examine the effect of wintering pregnant, nonlactating dairy cows outdoors on either kale or grass, fed in 1 [11 kg dry matter (DM) of kale or grass + 3 kg DM of baled barley straw offered in the morning] or 2 allocations (5.5 kg DM of kale or grass grazed + 1.5 kg DM of barley straw offered morning and afternoon) per day. The body condition score (BCS) gain over the 47-d winter feeding period was higher for grass-fed (0.5 BCS units) than kale-fed cows (0.3 BCS units), but was unaffected by feeding frequency. Forage DM utilization was higher for kale-fed (97%) than grass-fed cows (76%), leading to higher estimated dry matter intake (DMI) in kale-fed (10.7 kg of DM/cow per day) than grass-fed cows (7.7 kg of DM/cow per day). Forage DM utilization and estimated DMI were not affected by feeding frequency. Prehension bite rate was greater for grass-fed (37.3 bites/min) than kale-fed cows (7.6 bites/min), but more mastication bites were required for kale-fed cows. Cumulative DMI after 2, 3, and 6 h was greater in cows allocated forage once than twice a day and for kale than grass after 3 and 6 h. Mean eating time was greater for cows offered forage once (477 min) than twice (414 min) per day. In conclusion, increasing feeding frequency from once to twice per day decreased the intake rate within the first 6 h after allocation, but did not affect total daily DMI, DM utilization or BCS gain. Thus, moving cows more frequently would not have any significant advantage. It may increase labor requirements, thereby creating a more challenging wintering management than feeding once per day.
本研究旨在探讨冬季户外放牧怀孕、非泌乳奶牛食用羽衣甘蓝或草的效果,每日分 1 次(提供 11 公斤干物质 [DM] 的羽衣甘蓝或草+3 公斤 DM 的捆扎大麦秸秆)或 2 次(每天上午提供 5.5 公斤 DM 的羽衣甘蓝或草放牧+1.5 公斤 DM 的大麦秸秆)进行投喂。在 47 天的冬季饲养期间,与喂食羽衣甘蓝的奶牛(0.3 个 BCS 单位)相比,喂食草的奶牛(0.5 个 BCS 单位)的体况评分(BCS)增加更多,但不受投喂频率的影响。与喂食草的奶牛(97%)相比,喂食羽衣甘蓝的奶牛(76%)对干物质的利用率更高,导致喂食羽衣甘蓝的奶牛(10.7 公斤/奶牛/天)的估计干物质采食量(DMI)高于喂食草的奶牛(7.7 公斤/奶牛/天)。投喂频率对干物质利用率和估计 DMI 没有影响。与喂食羽衣甘蓝的奶牛(7.6 次/分钟)相比,喂食草的奶牛(37.3 次/分钟)的采食速度更快,但喂食羽衣甘蓝的奶牛需要更多的咀嚼次数。与每天分配两次相比,每天分配一次的奶牛在 2、3 和 6 小时后累积的 DMI 更高,在 3 和 6 小时后,喂食草的奶牛的累积 DMI 高于喂食羽衣甘蓝的奶牛。与每天分配两次相比,每天分配一次的奶牛的采食时间更长(477 分钟),每天分配两次的奶牛的采食时间更短(414 分钟)。总之,从每天分配一次增加到两次会降低分配后前 6 小时的采食量,但不会影响奶牛的总日 DMI、干物质利用率或 BCS 增加。因此,更频繁地移动奶牛不会带来任何显著的优势。它可能会增加劳动力需求,从而使冬季管理比每天分配一次更具挑战性。