Department of Forest Ecosystems and Society, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, 97331, USA.
Department of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, University of Bari "A. Moro", Via Amendola 165/A, 70126, Bari, Italy.
Ecol Appl. 2018 Mar;28(2):291-308. doi: 10.1002/eap.1644. Epub 2018 Jan 19.
Wildfires pose a unique challenge to conservation in fire-prone regions, yet few studies quantify the cumulative effects of wildfires on forest dynamics (i.e., changes in structural conditions) across landscape and regional scales. We assessed the contribution of wildfire to forest dynamics in the eastern Cascade Mountains, USA from 1985 to 2010 using imputed maps of forest structure (i.e., tree size and canopy cover) and remotely sensed burn severity maps. We addressed three questions: (1) How do dynamics differ between the region as a whole and the unburned portion of the region? (2) How do dynamics vary among vegetation zones differing in biophysical setting and historical fire frequency? (3) How have forest structural conditions changed in a network of late successional reserves (LSRs)? Wildfires affected 10% of forests in the region, but the cumulative effects at this scale were primarily slight losses of closed-canopy conditions and slight gains in open-canopy conditions. In the unburned portion of the region (the remaining 90%), closed-canopy conditions primarily increased despite other concurrent disturbances (e.g., harvest, insects). Although the effects of fire were largely dampened at the regional scale, landscape scale dynamics were far more variable. The warm ponderosa pine and cool mixed conifer zones experienced less fire than the region as a whole despite experiencing the most frequent fire historically. Open-canopy conditions increased slightly in the mixed conifer zone, but declined across the ponderosa pine zone even with wildfires. Wildfires burned 30% of the cold subalpine zone, which experienced the greatest increase in open-canopy conditions and losses of closed-canopy conditions. LSRs were more prone to wildfire than the region as a whole, and experienced slight declines in late seral conditions. Despite losses of late seral conditions, wildfires contributed to some conservation objectives by creating open habitats (e.g., sparse early seral and woodland conditions) that otherwise generally decreased in unburned landscapes despite management efforts to increase landscape diversity. This study demonstrates the potential for wildfires to contribute to regional scale conservation objectives, but implications for management and biodiversity at landscape scales vary geographically among biophysical settings, and are contingent upon historical dynamics and individual species habitat preferences.
野火在火灾多发地区的保护中构成了独特的挑战,但很少有研究量化野火对森林动态(即结构条件的变化)在景观和区域尺度上的累积影响。我们使用森林结构(即树木大小和树冠覆盖)的推断图和遥感火烧严重度图评估了美国东喀斯喀特山脉 1985 年至 2010 年期间野火对森林动态的贡献。我们提出了三个问题:(1)整个区域和区域未燃烧部分之间的动态有何不同?(2)在生物物理背景和历史火灾频率不同的植被带之间,动态如何变化?(3)在一个后期演替保护区(LSR)网络中森林结构条件发生了哪些变化?野火影响了该地区 10%的森林,但在该尺度上的累积效应主要是封闭树冠条件的轻微损失和开阔树冠条件的轻微增加。在该地区未燃烧的部分(剩余的 90%),尽管存在其他并发干扰(如采伐、虫害),但封闭树冠条件主要增加。尽管在区域尺度上火灾的影响在很大程度上被减弱,但景观尺度的动态变化要大得多。尽管历史上最频繁发生火灾,但温暖的黄松和凉爽的混合针叶林带的火灾发生率低于整个地区。在混合针叶林带,开阔树冠条件略有增加,但在黄松带,即使有野火,也有所下降。寒冷的亚高山带的 30%被野火燃烧,该带经历了最大的开阔树冠条件增加和封闭树冠条件损失。LSR 比整个地区更容易受到野火的影响,晚期演替条件略有下降。尽管晚期演替条件有所损失,但野火通过创造开阔的栖息地(例如稀疏的早期演替和林地条件)为一些保护目标做出了贡献,否则这些条件在未燃烧的景观中通常会减少,尽管为增加景观多样性而进行了管理努力。本研究表明,野火有可能有助于实现区域尺度的保护目标,但在景观尺度上,管理和生物多样性的影响在不同的生物物理背景下存在地域差异,并且取决于历史动态和单个物种的栖息地偏好。