University of Washington School of Environmental and Forest Sciences, Seattle, Washington, 98195-2100, USA.
U.S. Forest Service PNW Research Station, Wenatchee, Washington, 98801, USA.
Ecol Appl. 2021 Dec;31(8):e02433. doi: 10.1002/eap.2433. Epub 2021 Oct 13.
We review science-based adaptation strategies for western North American (wNA) forests that include restoring active fire regimes and fostering resilient structure and composition of forested landscapes. As part of the review, we address common questions associated with climate adaptation and realignment treatments that run counter to a broad consensus in the literature. These include the following: (1) Are the effects of fire exclusion overstated? If so, are treatments unwarranted and even counterproductive? (2) Is forest thinning alone sufficient to mitigate wildfire hazard? (3) Can forest thinning and prescribed burning solve the problem? (4) Should active forest management, including forest thinning, be concentrated in the wildland urban interface (WUI)? (5) Can wildfires on their own do the work of fuel treatments? (6) Is the primary objective of fuel reduction treatments to assist in future firefighting response and containment? (7) Do fuel treatments work under extreme fire weather? (8) Is the scale of the problem too great? Can we ever catch up? (9) Will planting more trees mitigate climate change in wNA forests? And (10) is post-fire management needed or even ecologically justified? Based on our review of the scientific evidence, a range of proactive management actions are justified and necessary to keep pace with changing climatic and wildfire regimes and declining forest heterogeneity after severe wildfires. Science-based adaptation options include the use of managed wildfire, prescribed burning, and coupled mechanical thinning and prescribed burning as is consistent with land management allocations and forest conditions. Although some current models of fire management in wNA are averse to short-term risks and uncertainties, the long-term environmental, social, and cultural consequences of wildfire management primarily grounded in fire suppression are well documented, highlighting an urgency to invest in intentional forest management and restoration of active fire regimes.
我们回顾了北美的西部(wNA)森林基于科学的适应策略,包括恢复活跃的火灾机制和培育有弹性的森林景观结构和组成。作为审查的一部分,我们解决了与气候适应和调整处理相关的常见问题,这些处理与文献中的广泛共识相悖。这些问题包括以下几个方面:(1)火灾排除的影响是否被夸大了?如果是这样,处理措施是否没有必要,甚至适得其反?(2)单独进行森林疏伐是否足以减轻野火的危害?(3)森林疏伐和计划火烧能否解决问题?(4)是否应该集中在野地城区界面(WUI)进行积极的森林管理,包括森林疏伐?(5)野火本身能否完成燃料处理的工作?(6)减少燃料的主要目标是协助未来的消防应对和控制吗?(7)燃料处理在极端火灾天气下是否有效?(8)问题的规模是否太大?我们能赶上吗?(9)在 wNA 森林中种植更多的树木是否能减轻气候变化?(10)火灾后管理是否需要,甚至在生态上是否合理?基于我们对科学证据的审查,一系列积极的管理行动是合理和必要的,以适应不断变化的气候和野火机制,以及严重野火后森林异质性的下降。基于科学的适应选择包括使用管理性野火、计划火烧以及机械疏伐和计划火烧的结合,这与土地管理分配和森林状况一致。尽管 wNA 目前的一些火灾管理模式对短期风险和不确定性持抵触态度,但主要基于火灾抑制的野火管理的长期环境、社会和文化后果已有充分记录,这凸显了投资于有目的的森林管理和恢复活跃的火灾机制的紧迫性。