Glassford Eric, Burr Gregory
a National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health , Cincinnati , Ohio.
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2018 Jan;15(1):D1-D7. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2017.1388511.
The Health Hazard Evaluation Program of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health evaluated a steel building materials manufacturer. The employer requested the evaluation because of concerns about optical radiation hazards from a plasma arc cutting system and the need to clarify eye protection requirements for plasma operators, other employees, and visitors. The strength of the ultraviolet radiation, visible radiation (light), and infrared radiation generated by the plasma arc cutter was measured at various distances from the source and at different operating amperages. Investigators also observed employees performing the plasma arc cutting. Optical radiation above safe levels for the unprotected eyes in the ultraviolet-C, ultraviolet-B, and visible light ranges were found during plasma arc cutting. In contrast, infrared and ultraviolet-A radiation levels during plasma arc cutting were similar to background levels. The highest non-ionizing radiation exposures occurred when no welding curtains were used. A plasma arc welding curtain in place did not eliminate optical radiation hazards to the plasma arc operator or to nearby employees. In most instances, the measured intensities for visible light, UV-C, and UV-B resulted in welding shade lens numbers that were lower than those stipulated in the OSHA Filter Lenses for Protection Against Radiant Energy table in 29 CFR 1910.133(a)(5). Investigators recommended using a welding curtain that enclosed the plasma arc, posting optical radiation warning signs in the plasma arc cutter area, installing audible or visual warning cues when the plasma arc cutter was operating, and using welding shades that covered the plasma arc cutter operator's face to protect skin from ultraviolet radiation hazards.
美国国家职业安全与健康研究所的健康危害评估项目对一家钢结构建筑材料制造商进行了评估。由于担心等离子弧切割系统产生的光辐射危害,以及需要明确等离子弧切割操作人员、其他员工和访客的眼部防护要求,雇主提出了此次评估请求。在距等离子弧切割器不同距离以及不同操作电流下,测量了其产生的紫外线辐射、可见光(光)和红外线辐射的强度。调查人员还观察了员工进行等离子弧切割的操作情况。在等离子弧切割过程中,发现紫外线C、紫外线B和可见光范围内存在高于无防护眼睛安全水平的光辐射。相比之下,等离子弧切割过程中的红外线和紫外线A辐射水平与背景水平相似。在不使用焊接帘时,非电离辐射暴露量最高。安装了等离子弧焊接帘并不能消除对等离子弧切割操作人员或附近员工的光辐射危害。在大多数情况下,可见光、紫外线C和紫外线B的测量强度所对应的焊接遮光镜片编号低于美国职业安全与健康管理局(OSHA)在《29 CFR 1910.133(a)(5) 防止辐射能的滤光镜片》表中规定的编号。调查人员建议使用能围住等离子弧的焊接帘,在等离子弧切割区域张贴光辐射警告标志,在等离子弧切割器运行时安装听觉或视觉警告提示,并使用能覆盖等离子弧切割器操作人员面部的焊接遮光罩,以保护皮肤免受紫外线辐射危害。