Ahn Jinhee, Kim Hyun Jung, Choi Jong-Il, Lee Kwang No, Shim Jaemin, Ahn Hyeong Sik, Kim Young-Hoon
Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine and Korea University Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea.
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 23;12(10):e0185680. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185680. eCollection 2017.
Beta-blockers are first-line therapy in patients with congenital long-QT syndrome (LQTS).
This study sought to determine the differences in effectiveness of beta-blockers on risk reduction according to LQTS genotype.
We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases to investigate the use of beta-blockers (atenolol, nadolol, propranolol, and metoprolol) in patients with LQTS. Hazard ratio (HR) and relative risk (RR) were extracted or calculated from studies reporting cardiac events (syncope, aborted cardiac arrest (ACA), or sudden cardiac death (SCD)).
Among 2,113 articles searched, 10 studies (7 registry-based cohort studies (Cohort) and 3 interrupted time series studies (ITS)) involving 9,727 patients were included. In a meta-analysis using a random-effect model, the use of beta-blocker was associated with significant risk reduction of all cardiac events (HR 0.49, p<0.001 in Cohort; RR 0.39, p<0.001 in ITS) and serious cardiac events (ACA or SCD) (HR 0.47, p<0.001 in Cohort). In both LQT1 and LQT2, the risk was reduced with beta-blocker therapy in Cohort (HR 0.59 in LQT1; HR 0.39 in LQT2) as well as ITS (RR 0.29 in LQT1; RR 0.48 in LQT2). Among the beta-blockers, nadolol showed a significant risk reduction in both LQT1 and LQT2 (HR 0.47 and 0.27, respectively), whereas atenolol and propranolol decreased the risk only in LQT1 (HR 0.36 and 0.46, respectively). Metoprolol showed no significant reduction in either genotype. In LQT3, beta-blocker therapy was not as effective as LQT1 or LQT2; however, it was inconclusive due to data insufficiency.
This meta-analysis showed that beta-blockers were effective in reducing risk of cardiac events in patients with LQTS. Among them, nadolol was effective in LQT1 and LQT2, whereas other drugs showed different effectiveness depending on LQT genotype.
β受体阻滞剂是先天性长QT综合征(LQTS)患者的一线治疗药物。
本研究旨在确定β受体阻滞剂根据LQTS基因型降低风险的有效性差异。
我们检索了MEDLINE、EMBASE和CENTRAL数据库,以调查β受体阻滞剂(阿替洛尔、纳多洛尔、普萘洛尔和美托洛尔)在LQTS患者中的使用情况。从报告心脏事件(晕厥、心脏骤停未遂(ACA)或心源性猝死(SCD))的研究中提取或计算风险比(HR)和相对风险(RR)。
在检索的2113篇文章中,纳入了10项研究(7项基于注册的队列研究(队列)和3项中断时间序列研究(ITS)),涉及9727名患者。在使用随机效应模型的荟萃分析中,使用β受体阻滞剂与所有心脏事件的显著风险降低相关(队列中HR为0.49,p<0.001;ITS中RR为0.39,p<0.001)以及严重心脏事件(ACA或SCD)(队列中HR为0.47,p<0.001)。在LQT1和LQT2中,队列(LQT1中HR为0.59;LQT2中HR为0.39)以及ITS(LQT1中RR为0.29;LQT2中RR为0.48)中β受体阻滞剂治疗均降低了风险。在β受体阻滞剂中,纳多洛尔在LQT1和LQT2中均显示出显著的风险降低(分别为HR 0.47和0.27),而阿替洛尔和普萘洛尔仅在LQT1中降低了风险(分别为HR 0.36和0.46)。美托洛尔在两种基因型中均未显示出显著降低。在LQT3中,β受体阻滞剂治疗不如LQT1或LQT2有效;然而,由于数据不足,结果尚无定论。
这项荟萃分析表明,β受体阻滞剂可有效降低LQTS患者的心脏事件风险。其中,纳多洛尔在LQT1和LQT2中有效,而其他药物根据LQT基因型显示出不同的有效性。